It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by rogerstigers
reply to post by MRedfield
Actually, yeah, I do. Their tactic (the Japenese Fishing Industry, that is) has always been to stay within the grey area of the law. What they do is technically not illegal, only because of loopholes. Ignoring an SOS is a violation of international maritime law.
Originally posted by MRedfield
reply to post by rogerstigers
You wonder why the Japanese fleet hasn't responded?
If you were doing something that was completely legal by all international standards and laws, and a group of renegade people who are deadset that their beliefs are right are constantly attacking your ship with prop foulers, stink bombs, slippery bombs, lasers, and assorted other underhanded tactics...would you really go help them out after they have an accident?
Originally posted by popsmayhem
LAY OFF..
If the JAPS want to eat whales
let them!!
No ones business what animals others eat!!
[COLOR=GOLD] ALL ANIMAL CONSUMPTION MAY BE FUTURE BUSINESS?!?!?!? [/COLOR]
Originally posted by Nana2
Originally posted by MRedfield
reply to post by rogerstigers
You wonder why the Japanese fleet hasn't responded?
If you were doing something that was completely legal by all international standards and laws, and a group of renegade people who are deadset that their beliefs are right are constantly attacking your ship with prop foulers, stink bombs, slippery bombs, lasers, and assorted other underhanded tactics...would you really go help them out after they have an accident?
what the japanese are doing in THOSE particular waters is NOT legal. It is a no-whaling zone, set up by international board. That is why they lie and post signs on the sides of their ships that they are just out there doing "research."
Originally posted by Grimpachi
Ever since the invention of kerosene there has been no need to hunt whales, that being said the crew does push the limits. Although I may not approve completely of their tactics I do admire them for putting their money where their mouth is. They do get results and I'm sure that they sleep fine at night. Even if you don't agree with them you should admire them for their tenacity. I hope they come away from this safe and maybe one day there will not be a need for such extremists. Today what they're doing they must believe in it. Where most people talk about changing the world they are actually trying to change the world. For that alone they have my respect.
Originally posted by Wotan
Actually it is perfectly legal to fish for whales in the Southern Ocean as it is not enforceable by any International law, it is only a IWC ruleing, not a law.
Japanese whaling within Australian waters in Antarctica is illegal and should be stopped, a court ruled on Tuesday.
It is now up to the Australian government to decide whether to enforce the injunction. And even then it is unclear whether the ruling could be enforced as unless the whaling vessels enter Australia, "there is no practical mechanism by which orders of this court can be enforced" conceded Federal Court judge Jim Allsop.
The Australian Whale Sanctuary, which protects all whales and dolphins in Australian waters, was proclaimed in 2000.
These waters include a 200-mile wide stretch adjacent to Australia's Antarctic territory, in which more than 1300 whales were killed by Japanese company Kyodo Senpaku Kaisha between 2000 and 2006, estimates Humane Society International.
Originally posted by Ophiuchus 13
Originally posted by popsmayhem
LAY OFF..
If the JAPS want to eat whales
let them!!
No ones business what animals others eat!!
[COLOR=GOLD] ALL ANIMAL CONSUMPTION MAY BE FUTURE BUSINESS?!?!?!? [/COLOR]
Its not about what the sapiens sapiens of ASIA quardrant EAT! its about the balance in nature. THERE IS REASON THE GEORGIA GUIDESTONES MENTIONS THE POPULATION OF MAN ON EARTH SHOULDNT EXCEED 500,000,000 TO KEEP BALANCE* WITH NATURE.edit on 12/29/11 by Ophiuchus 13 because: (no reason given)
Paul Watson, onboard flagship vessel Steve Irwin, says it took 18 hours to reach the damaged vessel.
He says it is now being escorted to Fremantle for repairs.
"We're with the Brigitte Bardot right now and we're about 1,200 miles from Fremantle and we're heading that way," he said.
"The Brigitte Bardot is going about seven-and-a-half knots so we're just escorting it and so far everything's going pretty good."
...
It is expected to take about five days to escort the distressed ship back to Fremantle.
Originally posted by Wotan
Maritime Law also says that you should not intentionally ram another ship - The Sea Shepherd crews are nothing but Pirates IMHO and should be hung, drawn and quartered like all captured Pirates should be.
Definition of acts of piracy
The Law defines the following acts committed for private ends on the high seas or territorial sea as well as internal waters of Japan by the crew or the passengers of a ship (except for warships and other
government ships) as “acts of piracy”:
(a) seizing another ship in navigation or taking control of the
operation of another ship by rendering persons irresistible by
assault, intimidation or any other means;
(b) robbing property on board another ship in navigation or obtaining
or causing others to obtain an unlawful profit by rendering persons
irresistible by assault, intimidation or any other means;
(c) kidnapping a person on board another ship in navigation for the
purpose of taking the person hostage to demand a third person to
deliver any property or to take any other unobligated action or to
waive that person’s right;
(d) demanding a third person to deliver any property or to take any
other unobligated action or to waive that person’s right by taking a
person, on board a robbed ship or a ship whose control is taken or
kidnapped on board another ship in navigation, hostage;
(e) breaking into or damaging another ship in navigation for the
purpose of committing the acts of piracy as referred to in
subparagphs (a), (b), (c) and (d) above;
(f) operating a ship and approaching in close proximity of,
beleaguering or obstructing the passage of another ship for the
purpose of committing the acts of piracy as referred to in
subparagphs (a), (b), (c) and (d) above;
(g) preparing weapons and operating a ship for the purpose of
committing the acts of piracy as referred to in subparagphs (a),
(b), (c) and (d) above.
ExpertLaw.com
Typically, the elements of a cause of action for defamation include:
A false and defamatory statement concerning another;
The unprivileged publication of the statement to a third party (that is, somebody other than the person defamed by the statement);
If the defamatory matter is of public concern, fault amounting at least to negligence on the part of the publisher; and
Damage to the plaintiff.
Originally posted by Wotan
Originally posted by Grimpachi
Ever since the invention of kerosene there has been no need to hunt whales, that being said the crew does push the limits. Although I may not approve completely of their tactics I do admire them for putting their money where their mouth is. They do get results and I'm sure that they sleep fine at night. Even if you don't agree with them you should admire them for their tenacity. I hope they come away from this safe and maybe one day there will not be a need for such extremists. Today what they're doing they must believe in it. Where most people talk about changing the world they are actually trying to change the world. For that alone they have my respect.
Though I agree with you that whales are not needed for their oil, whaleing nations such as Iceland, Norway and Japan and also the US hunt them for their meat.