Anonymous DOES NOT support Ron Paul

reply to post by pierregustavetoutant


I don't need to he says them every time he's in a debate. PLOY

reply to post by pierregustavetoutant


I capitalized my words to make it a point. You can decide what the facts are for yourself. However, this is yet another, "off-topic," post.

reply to post by TheRedP1LL


Really? I would say that I usually answer the questions provided quite well. However, in this case...its yet, another off-topic post.

By the way...I love your avatar name. (THE RED PILL!!!)

Sounds like you have an idea of what's up!!!

Originally posted by Destiny777
reply to post by seabag

 

Not voting at all. I am aware enough to know that the two-party system has failed us.

By ranting at everyone who is considering voting for RP...then saying you are not going to vote at all, for anyone...

Well, in my book, that makes you part of the problem.

Originally posted by Domo1
Never mind missed first link. I don't think you speak for the group. Also, while certainly not all people 'affiliated' are Ron Paul supporters, the vast majority are.

One more thing... So you want us to round up and arrest everyone in power, and then what? We all vote 3rd party? You don't seem to have a plan. Things need to change, but these ridiculous threads and posts clamoring to round everyone in the government and financial institutions up are ludicrous. You would cripple the entire country.

edit on 24-12-2011 by Domo1 because: (no reason given)

edit on 24-12-2011 by Domo1 because: (no reason given)

You are correct. I do NOT speak for the group. So, we are in agreement. However, the link that I provided clearly shows that this particular "branch," of anonymous (if there are any branches) don't support Ron Paul's theories and ideas.

I don't seem to have a plan? Was I supposed to?

My plan is the same as Iceland's which is in the link provided. And no, the entire country wouldn't be crippled, Iceland's economy is up and running right now and is quite successful.

Thank you though for addressing the topic at hand, and I appreciate your involvement.

Much LOVE brother...

reply to post by Destinyone


Maybe, and according to your view...you might be right.

However, those who DO vote for the politicians in charge who have wrecked the country are far more at fault and have less reason to complain about the results than those who did not vote.

I appreciate your comment and participation.

Originally posted by Destiny777
reply to post by seabag

 

Not voting at all. I am aware enough to know that the two-party system has failed us.

It's probably best that you don't vote if you don't find anyone you support. After all, Obama got elected because people were voting against Bush (even though he wasn't running). Don't vote just to vote against RP. 

As far as your rant, I'd have to say if there was anyone in the primary that did not fit that bill it would be Ron Paul; he's as consistent as they come. The only other consistent candidate is (like him or not) Rick Santorum. 

reply to post by Destiny777


Oh you responded hang on.

reply to post by seabag


I definitely agree that his voting was consistent. However, if things are as rigged as they appear to be, then its quite possible that this has been in the works for awhile. Although, I cannot prove that statement.

Thanks for your contribution...

Originally posted by Destiny777
reply to post by seabag

 

Not voting at all. I am aware enough to know that the two-party system has failed us.

The two party system has failed us only so far as the feeders who do the voting have frequently picked the wrong people.

This time we actually have a GOOD option - with pretty impressive momentum so far, who has always been consistent, by all measures is genuine in what he says, and has been warning us of various problems years before they became drastic issues.

Why on earth would you pick NOW to sit on your hands? Those same knuckleheads who have supported so many of the wrong ones before certainly aren't going to. You're just going to yield the field to them?

And then complain about how the system failed, I'd bet. I get it, I get it...

reply to post by TheRedP1LL


Yes, I am aware of why and how wars are begun. However, we're (as in, YOU AND I) not experiencing any positive results from our Nation's non-stop wars, are we? I know that I'm not.

Again, I love your avatar name. Very indicative of someone who is at least thinking outside of the box.

Much LOVE brother...

reply to post by Praetorius


On the surface, it would APPEAR that we have a good option. Just keep the skeptical eye about you. ATS is at least, very good for that.

Thanks for you contribution my friend...

Much LOVE...

reply to post by seabag
Thanks Seabag.

Curious, have you made any more steps towards peace with Paul's foreign policy, by chance? Hope you're well, and have a blessed Christmas.

Originally posted by definity
exactly, its called politics not lying, all they do is lie to get into power. there power hungry. people where relived that a black man was in the whitehouse, # OFF half the # that obama promised haven't happened it about poor and the rich divide now not black and white. you got realise these people care about power, i was also thinking that this all could be a front, I mean all politicians have them before they get into power.

edit on 24-12-2011 by definity because: (no reason given)

edit on 24-12-2011 by definity because: (no reason given)

I am in pure agreement...thank you so much for taking the time to post.

Much LOVE brother...

reply to post by Destiny777

You are correct. I do NOT speak for the group. So, we are in agreement. However, the link that I provided clearly shows that this particular "branch," of anonymous (if there are any branches) don't support Ron Paul's theories and ideas.

Yes this 'branch' appears not to support Ron Paul. Not every 'affiliate' of Anonymous agrees on all topics at all times. I suppose I still don't understand 'Anonymous DOES NOT support Ron Paul was picked as the thread title.

I don't seem to have a plan? Was I supposed to? My plan is the same as Iceland's which is in the link provided. And no, the entire country wouldn't be crippled, Iceland's economy is up and running right now and is quite successful.

I suppose you don't need to have a plan, but asking for such major change without one seems like a bad idea. I've clicked all the links and failed to find one on Iceland, would you mind linking me to it in a reply to this post?

reply to post by Destiny777


lol.. you are kinda buying right in. They don't want people like you to vote, luckily it is easy enough to fool you into not doing it. What does it hurt to cast a useless vote if the other option is to not cast one at all?

A vote for Ron Paul is the only sensible thing to do really. It has gotten to that point where in fact there is only one real choice for Americans wanting solutions.