Immediate Deployment Just Ordered, Merry Christmas

Originally posted by TrueAmerican
If so many of you are fairly confident this OP is a HOAX:

1) Why is it at the top of ATS?

2) Has anyone alerted staff yet that it is likely a HOAX?

3) Knowingly posting false info = immediate ban.

Exactly...why is this not in the "HOAX" forum already?

Is there something to it or not?

Another vote for the hoax forum, the OP is trying either to push a B.S. agenda or get attention.

I vote it stays.

If you don't believe it, then don't bother posting or worrying about it. It is a legitimate concern, so if it turns out to be true we can know, if it doesn't so be it.

Far worse threads have gotten thousands of posts and hundreds of flags.

how about some of you do a little investigating os BS or HOAX um well saying off to Syria would be but as the OP threads says, no BS or hoax here

"Despite the fact that the rest of the Army is in a drawdown, the air defense community is becoming a lot busier," Lt. Col. William J. McKnight, commander of the 4th Battalion, 5th Air Defense Artillery Regiment, 69th Air Defense Artillery Brigade, said at the West Fort Hood gym during a deployment ceremony. "The dynamics are changing."

The battalion left Monday for a deployment to Southwest Asia. Its exact

destination and location are unclear, but McKnight said his soldiers will defend strategic assets from possible threats originating from state and non-state actors.

During the ceremony at West Fort Hood, colors were cased and about 400 soldiers left for a yearlong deployment to various locations in the region. They will replace another battalion from within the brigade — 1st Battalion, 44th Air Defense Artillery Regiment, which will return to Fort Hood later this month.

from news source www.kdhnews.com...

reply to post by RSF77

If you don't believe it, then don't bother posting or worrying about it. It is a legitimate concern.

Of course it is a legitimate concern if it is true...but if not then it belongs else where!

The sources presented either credit the truthfulness...or discredit it...so who is to say at the moment?

Is it left a headline until it is discredited...and who gets to say that?

I read through the many post and thank you all for your time in doing so.

I can only give the information as I have received it, this is no hoax as some are claiming, will the deployment be put off or will they land elsewhere this I do not know.

Anyone who has looked my threads up will clearly see I am about the law and have many threads and articles explaining what many do not want to hear. Remember Hitler broke no laws. And neither has Obama, except not being eligible in the first place.

A recent case put out about by the Supreme Court in reference to eligibility to hold the office of President of the United States clearly shows the Mr. Obama was NOT eligible. At this time my team of researches who has known this since day ONE, is going over the case brought to our attention yesterday. Will anything come of this? Probably not, however anyone truly interested in the TRUTH IN LAW please look up my threads on that very topic.
US SUPREME COURT PRECEDENT STATES THAT OBAMA IS NOT ELIGIBLE TO BE PRESIDENT.
[UPDATED: Dec. 15, 2011] Black’s Law Dictionary defines “precedent” as a “rule of law established for the first time by a court for a particular type of case and thereafter referred to in deciding similar cases“. It can no longer be denied that there is controlling US Supreme Court precedent concerning the definition of a natural-born citizen according to Article 2 Section 1 of the US Constitution.
And for those who are always looking for the case number this is the older case in question we are currently researching.
PRECEDENT ESTABLISHED BY MINOR V. HAPPERSETT
The direct US Supreme Court precedent is stated in Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162 (1875).

If and when I receive further update on this deployment with any credible links I will post them until then will have to rely on my people stationed at the base.

Thanks again.

Would love to have this added to my original posting however that option for editing is not available if ATS can do that would greatly be appreciated. Thank you.

A lot of people on here claiming hoax. Maybe... for now. Anyone who pays attention to the timeline of invasions by the US knows that all the recent violations of International Law and National Sovereignty have begun with "sanctions". We are well along that path with Syria and Iran as well don't you think? Doesn't take much of a leap of logic to figure who's next... (Hint: It's not Bali)

In any regard the next always step will be "no fly zones". Not secret troop movements. "Multiphase Operation" just like well, like all America's recent conquests.

There will be an "Emergency" that requires US to begin bombing the country in order to protect the Syrians from "themselves".

Right now we are in the Demonize, remove regime and sanction phase. The Media is the major player in that regard. Don't agree? Turn on the MSM. See how long it takes to spout negativity about Iran and Syria.

Next Phase...

reply to post by jerryznv


I could care less about what forum something is in. Often times I wonder what peoples motivations are for "voting" threads into some other section, despite the fact this forum is not a democracy.

There is fairly clear evidence in the thread that SOMETHING is happening, so who are you to move to shut it down so quick? You realize posting here in this thread you are actively promoting it, no matter what view you have on it? If you want the thread to go away, stop posting.

You might have a point if this thread was in the Breaking News forum, I still would say you are wrong because of the content inside of it.

Edit: Well... "wrong" is the wrong word here, sorry. It doesn't really matter I'll stop posting, this is getting off topic and such.

reply to post by RSF77


Hmmm...okay...well I certainly care...if I am reading something in a "HOAX" forum I already know it is B.S.

If I am reading it in a breaking news forum...well then I assume it is news...but that's just me!

I could care less about what forum it is in also...the could happily name it "the purple forum" for all I care.

I would just like to know if this is a hoax or not...and whether it deserves my attention...certainly at the moment it does have my attention...but if it is a hoax...well then I would have no interest in reading it anymore!

Originally posted by RSF77
reply to post by jerryznv

 

I could care less about what forum something is in. Often times I wonder what peoples motivations are for "voting" threads into some other section, despite the fact this forum is not a democracy.

There is fairly clear evidence in the thread that SOMETHING is happening, so who are you to move to shut it down so quick?

edit on 17-12-2011 by RSF77 because: (no reason given)

That got my left army grinning. Seems like a number of people want to be Mods or got "Modded Out" of a forum before and have bitter dregs. What do I know? I have all of four threads.

I believe this thread only because the military shuffles troops around on a regular basis, it does not mean we are going to be attacking Syria next week, it takes months to build up troops and equipment. If the US is going to have an all out assault on Syria then we all will know soon enough.

Are the CIA and Special forces there right now, I would think thats been true for some time.

Originally posted by projectvxn
reply to post by randyvs

 

Why not try to more fully vet information?

If some news agency says the Supreme Court ruled on this or that. Why not try to look up the docket number of the case and get the details from the horses mouth instead of getting the spin from the guy in the news agency that "says" what is being "said" by the SCOTUS?

It's a matter of taking the extra mile. If people who post links don't bother to fully vet out what they are posting they can be certain they will be torn apart in a debate if they are irresponsible enough to have their opinion influenced by BS.

I think the individual can do better, and must. This is the internet age. The fact that people STILL wanna take things at face value and continue to be lazy about the sources of information they use is simply inexcusable. It would be laughable if it didn't create legions of gullible conspiracy theorists.

Of course I like this idea Project and it does get employed, when I have the one favored luxery and most important component of the endeaver you perscribe.



There's no way I'm going to research everything I comment on. It's called having a life Pro.
I don't mean that as a put down tho I did have a lil fun with it.
Your point remains strong.

At this point, the only thing that could possibly stop WW3 is electing Ron Paul. Of course the medial and TPTB will do everything they can to stop this. Everyone who believes in prayer better start praying about this because it isn't looking good!

Wow 2012 with ron paul as potus cant come quick enough. Stop all these useless foreign wars.
RonPaul2012

Arab League gives Syria until Wednesday to accept peace plan, considers turning to UN

I wonder if this is related...

The US only has one hope, that's Ron Paul. He will stop this madness. But the fools that people are, will believe the crazyness and all the reasons we need to be at war, and ignorantly go along with the program or their self interest 'candy bait' from the polititions this next election. If Ron Paul don't get elected, no one need bother piching a bich, because they will have brought it all upon them selves.

reply to post by RSF77


I'm with you man, and I honestly could care less about the name of the forum...There are a group of people on this site that just love to tattle on eachother. And there are a group of people who take ATS a little too serious...

reply to post by randyvs


Understood.

But getting a docket number and doing a google search is a mere few minutes compared to hours of backpedaling one would have to do if their position is compromised by BS.

Originally posted by jhn7537
And there are a group of people who take ATS a little too serious...

No truer words have ever been posted here.

I was reading some Quotes by Samuel Clemons, better known as Mark Twain, mind you these were written in the 1800's, but I can't see why these would not hold true today.......


To be a patriot, one had to say, and keep on saying, " Our country, right or wrong," and urge on the little war. Have you not perceived that that phrase is an insult to the nation.
- "Glances at History," 1906

An inglorious peace is better than a dishonorable war.
- "Glances at History," 1906

Statesmen will invent cheap lies, putting blame upon the nation that is attacked, and every man will be glad of those conscience-soothing falsities, and will diligently study them, and refuse to examine any refutations of them; and thus he will by and by convince himself that the war is just, and will thank God for the better sleep he enjoys after this process of grotesque self-deception.
- "Chronicle of Young Satan"

Man is the only animal that deals in that atrocity of atrocities, War. He is the only one that gathers his brethren about him and goes forth in cold blood and calm pulse to exterminate his kind. He is the only animal that for sordid wages will march out...and help to slaughter strangers of his own species who have done him no harm and with whom he has no quarrel. ..And in the intervals between campaigns he washes the blood off his hands and works for "the universal brotherhood of man"--with his mouth.
- What Is Man?

SO TELL ME, what do you come away with. Me..... I'm getting damn sick of warring polititions who use OUR CHILDREN'S BLOOD and set in their ivory towers and proclaim hate and war in the name of patriotism, what vile filth they are.