It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
BreakingNews Breaking News White House issues statement saying it will not veto defense bill - @AP
Originally posted by Fitch303
Which defense bill is this referring to?
White House Says No Veto Of Defense Bill
By DONNA CASSATA
Associated Press
WASHINGTON (AP) -- The White House says senior officials will not recommend that President Barack Obama veto the defense bill awaiting passage in Congress.
A White House statement says changes by congressional negotiators would not challenge or restrict the president's ability to collect intelligence or incapacitate terrorists.
The White House had threatened a veto over provisions requiring military custody of suspected terrorists linked to al-Qaida.
hosted.ap.org...
Originally posted by akapapasmurf
reply to post by Fitch303
i'll take a guess and say its the 1 that allows the government to throw innocent americans in jail for the rest of their lives for opposing the syste thats designed to enslave them .
Originally posted by hapablab
Oh crap
Originally posted by Vitchilo
Originally posted by hapablab
Oh crap
Oh crap? Anyone with a brain saw that coming a mile away.
Breaking news, Obama is a stinking liar.
Originally posted by sam_inc
Sorry you guys, I'm really am!
BreakingNews Breaking News White House issues statement saying it will not veto defense bill - @AP
twitter.com...edit on 14-12-2011 by sam_inc because: (no reason given)
The defense bill talks about military funding for Iraq. Just a little confused, aren't we almost already out of Iraq. Since the deadline is 2012?
Despite the symbolism of the return of the base to Iraqi control, questions continue to swirl around the US occupation of Iraq and whether the end of the month is really the end or simply a pause before the next invasion.
This speculation is fueled primarily by the fact that the authorization to invade Iraq, which Congress based in 2002, is still on the books. Sen. Rand Paul (R – KY) attempted to put together a bipartisan coalition to revoke the authorization, a formal end to the conflict, and it failed miserable, with a 30-67 vote. The opposition to the bill was led by Sen. Joe Lieberman (I – CT), who complained that the bill would have “forced” the president to return to Congress to seek permission in the event he wanted to reinvade and reoccupy Iraq at some future date. Since the bill was not revoked, it seems that the president can simply choose to reinvade at any time.