It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Rockpuck
What is it with the UK Governments love affair with Muslims? They seem to go out of their way, beyond any rational explanation to cater to the needs to Muslims.
Originally posted by Rockpuck
They appear, from an outsiders perspective, to care more for immigrants of all kinds, especially Muslims, than native Brits?
Originally posted by Rockpuck
reply to post by EvanB
What is it with the UK Governments love affair with Muslims? They seem to go out of their way, beyond any rational explanation to cater to the needs to Muslims. They appear, from an outsiders perspective, to care more for immigrants of all kinds, especially Muslims, than native Brits?
Originally posted by hotbread
It's not hard to see that the court's decision is influenced by politics, that's what happens when politicians interfere with the justice system.
Originally posted by Sherlock Holmes
Originally posted by Rockpuck
What is it with the UK Governments love affair with Muslims? They seem to go out of their way, beyond any rational explanation to cater to the needs to Muslims.
That would be the impression you might get if you believed every falsely reported, cherry-picked and misrepresented story to emanate from a newspaper such as The Daily Fail.
The fact that the perpetrators were Muslim is irrelevant and immaterial to the story, but the way that The Daily Fail reports it makes it sound like that it was a relevant factor.
Drunken assaults aren't really that uncommon, and this one is not even newsworthy - it's only being reported by the right-wing papers with a strong anti-Muslim slant.
Originally posted by Rockpuck
They appear, from an outsiders perspective, to care more for immigrants of all kinds, especially Muslims, than native Brits?
Most Muslims in Britain are native Brits.
Originally posted by Sherlock Holmes
Originally posted by hotbread
It's not hard to see that the court's decision is influenced by politics, that's what happens when politicians interfere with the justice system.
It's got nothing to do with politics - other than the current trend to favour non-custodial sentences where possible, due to the burgeoning prison population in the UK.
Are all of these court decisions based on politics, too ?
Female soldier praised for service in Iraq and Afghanistan escapes jail for drunken attack on police officers
Axe-wielding drunk escapes jail
[Drunk] Assault man spared jail
Drunk teen escapes jail for ‘despicable’ attack on pub landlord
Perth man with three previous assault convictions spared jail after attacking female police officer
‘Cowardly drunk’ spared jail after attacking Sunderland policeman
Drunk woman, 22, spared jail for 'vile' attack on night bus passengers
Drunken attacker spared jail
Dru nk mum escapes jail sentence after biting boyfriend's testicles
Iraq-bound squaddie spared jail after [drunken] assault
Originally posted by hotbread
That only happens in politically sensitive cases like the Lockerbie bomber and the death of Diana for example,
not like the ones above.
Originally posted by steveknows
Why are courts in every western country so hell bent on not punishing muslims who show themselves to be raciest and religiously intolerant of their host country. This is the very kind of thing that sparked off the Cronulla riots in Sydney because muslims were doing things like this and the cops and courts were letting them get away with it.edit on 6-12-2011 by steveknows because: Typo
Originally posted by daggyz
Well, from I can read, they aren't Muslim girls, because real muslim girls woudln't behave that way. It's like saying the local white gang in downtown LA are Christians.