Twisted thug feed's a kitten to python in a sick Video

You try to logically argue with "logic" arguments - but sadly you fail.

Because with "logical" arguments i COULD also lay down why it would make sense to kill handicapped babies etc..which could make it "logically" right - but *STILL* morally wrong.

Just - this doesn't have ANYTHING to do with logical explanation. A person who is killing a pet that way is a sick *er and you can argue as long as want, it wont change this fact.

Psycho in the making. A psycho/sicko is one who doesn't have an emotion..and if you can without emotion kill a pet like that...well...then you are sick. And if you don't UNDERSTAND this and try to "logically" debate why it is "ok" for you..then i cant help you either..you are *almost* as sick then.

reply to post by Algernonsmouse


Some good points, but remember one important point, cats runs away when they don't trust somebody.

Originally posted by muse7
Last time I checked Rodents and Mice were near the bottom of the food chain

Cats were higher than mice in the food chain

Which further proves that this is a psycho that should be found and pay for this sadistic act of his, that sadly many here are defending.

Really? How does that prove anything. The food chain is only a tier system of eating. Sure a mouse might be at the "bottom" but do you really think a lion, who is consider at the top, is going to go prey on mice?

Also, to state that an animal is of more worth just because of what the "food chain" states is completely absurd. Nature works together, no matter who small a creature or large they all play a part in the entire thing and help each other. Without one the rest of the chain could fail. Mice eat up scraps of wasted food and help clean up the environment, just as a buzzard removes a carcass from the roads we drive on. They all serve equal importance. Honestly, as far as cats go (which are a domestic animal) they really don't provide much to nature. My town is unfortunately littered with feral and stray cats that continuously breed and cause disease to spread. Now, of course, this is what an animal is programmed to due, breed and make it's species strive, but these animals are no longer scene as part of nature and hardly exists in nature. Animals in nature don't easily get overpopulated because they have something larger to eat them and keep the numbers normal. Nothing eats a cat though, nor is it allowed according to the people in this thread. So, they just continue to breed and breed. That's not to say that we should condone to the killing of these animals, but that is how nature would deal with them.

reply to post by Noobastronomer


That looks just like the same guy that killed a litter of kittens by putting them in a bag and vaccuuming the air out.
I swear it's the same dude, and the internet had his number for a while. I thought they found him.

If it is the same dude, the first guys name was Luka Magnotta.
I suggest everyone look and see if they come to the same conclusion. You can find pics of him online.
Here is a link to the original heinous act and a picture (albeit blurred from the first incident)
www.gurl.com...

OH Yeah, and a warning, put a safe search on or search with the words kitten because as another poster pointed out heis a pornstar and you might see something you dont wanna see.

reply to post by buni11687


Cool and thank you for adding that. I am by no means a fan of deer hunting. I find nothing brave or exciting about sitting in a tree all day waiting for something to walk by so you can shoot it with a gun.

BUT!!!!!!

The deer here overpopulate so much that without hunting, they end up starving in fields and littering roads.

That is how Ohio looks to me with cats. I would rather people started feeding those cats to other animals and help the cycle go on instead of talking about how cute they are before they stop feeding them and let them out into busy roads.

I guess cruelty is higly subjective.

Originally posted by ShadowAngel85

(snip)

But i get a good laugh out of obviously mentally challenged people like dreams n chains and other people who wouldn't have a problem if this video included mice or rodents (yeah, useless animals, they are here to get eaten) and not a cat (the holy grail of animals it seems)

(snip)

Put words in peoples mouths much? Quote me next time and realize your fallacy.

Link to my post where no such thing was stated

Originally posted by muse7
reply to post by Algernonsmouse

 

I'm done with you.

Cats should not be fed to snakes when there are mice and other stuff available that is made to be fed to snakes.

I am not trying to fight with you here.

I just want to understand why it is any less cruel to feed my nieces pet rodent to a snake than it is some random cat? If you have the answer, share it with me. Is it just because cats are cuter?

Had to post another reply after I read the comments. I really just can't believe how many people are defending this?! I would not consider myself a PETA activist but for many reasons this is wrong. Well for starters this seems like a copycat remake of the cat killer video from this exact same time last year. I wonder is this a new Holiday Tradition? Can we look forward to hooded FARTS killing kittens on their beds every December?!


Same time frame pretty much. Same Premise: a hooded fart puts a HELPLESS kitten on the bed, pets it, then kills it.

ETA if that is a girl maybe this is some kind of sadistic couple or something. Also I wanted to add to the sickos who made this video...when you are eighty years old covered in deep bed sores in your own mess screaming at a unresponsive nurse while painfully desenting into dementia remember you deserved everything. Karma is real.

Originally posted by Amanda5
He needs to know that there are foods bred for the snake.
Feeding an unsuspecting kitten to the snake and filming it...
...reeks of psychopathic behaviour.

I am very confused. Where do they breed animals that expect to be eaten by a snake? Do they also enjoy it? Can you give a website or phone number?

Originally posted by _Phoenix_
reply to post by Algernonsmouse

 

Some good points, but remember one important point, cats runs away when they don't trust somebody.

edit on 4-12-2011 by _Phoenix_ because: (no reason given)

Not trying to start an argument here, but, do you think (since most people are claiming that it's the whole trust thing that is an issue) that it would have been better for this person to physically abuse the kitten and treat it like crap before it died? Would that have made it better if he didn't treat it nicely before it's death? I would surely hope that someone treated me with care before I was about to die, regardless of how the death came to be.

reply to post by ShadowAngel85


The cat is defenceless and is not found in the wild were a python would live, that is why it is sadistic and sick. Cats are not sold as food items in pet shops, that is why it is sadistic and sick. This python was not dieing and most likely had other food source available, that is why it is sadistic and sick. There are 100 other reasons why this is just plain wrong and it has nothing to do with "a emotional response". If you want to justify this guys actions then I suggest you evaluate your morals. Because you sure as hell don't want to get your wires are crossed like this guy.

I also think its cruel to feed rodents to snake too. Do you know why? Because they are defenceless. Atleast in nature a rodent has a chance to escape from a snake. I think keeping large snakes as domesticated animals is cruel and not right. Much the same as keeping a lion or tiger as a pet. Predators should not be kept as pets full stop.

People - please look at this thread with depth.
Separate the animals (both of them) and look at the human animal.

What this person is doing is not natural.
What this person is doing is not normal.
This is psychopathic behaviour.
Planning the event is psychopathic behaviour.
Actually going ahead with the event is psychopathic behaviour.
Taping the event is psychopathic behaviour.
Sharing this 'conquest' is psychopathic behaviour.

A cat or dog or any other animal by the side of the road is an awful unfortunate accident - not psychopathic.
Animals being killed and carved up in a slaughter house is unpleasant and happens because people have been brainwashed into thinking they need meat to survive - psychopaths have brainwashed you.
Animals and humans being tortured and experimented on is wrong and psychopathic.

If anyone needs me to continue I will.
To those who feel sick and angry at the content of this thread - at least you are still sentient and possess empathy and can react and think with your own brain - good for you - you are not alone.

Much Peace...for all victims of psychopaths...

reply to post by iamusic


Yeah he/she does seem to have the same shape nose and mouth. Interesting.

Originally posted by flexy123

I do not get your reasoning at all.

You are a sad person. People like you are the reason this world is #ed up.

You know nothing about me yet call me sad and blame me for all the ills of the world because I do not understand why a rat is ok and a cat is not?

You seem rational.

reply to post by Algernonsmouse


Pet shops supply the appropriate food.
Also consider that having a snake for a pet is a big responsibility.
Snake owners have to have a licence and need to know what to feed it.
Snake owners don't feed kittens to their snakes nor do they film the act.

Much Peace...

reply to post by iamusic


It's totally the same guy IMO. His name is Luka Magnotta.
At least that is what anonymous determined. I think they had found pictures of him with the same blanket that is on the bed.

Originally posted by RevelationGeneration
reply to post by _Phoenix_

 

The cat is defenceless and is not found in the wild were a python would live, that is why it is sadistic and sick. Cats are not sold as food items in pet shops, that is why it is sadistic and sick. This python was not dieing and most likely had other food source available, that is why it is sadistic and sick. There are 100 other reasons why this is just plain wrong and it has nothing to do with "a emotional response". If you want to justify this guys actions then I suggest you evaluate your morals. Because you sure as hell don't want to get your wires are crossed like this guy.

edit on 4-12-2011 by RevelationGeneration because: (no reason given)

Please reread my posts I was replying to a specific part about why I think some people are comparing kittens to babies. No apology necessary

Originally posted by RevelationGeneration

This guy is a pedofile/murderer in the making. He must of had a really sad upbringing.

Please elucidate.
If he feeds a live rat to a snake, he is probably going to be a doctor or a scholar but since it was a cat he is going to rape kids and kill people? I want to learn more.

1) Cats are not a snakes natural food source. Cats are domestic pets, and pets, at least in OUR culture are not meant for food. You have a problem with that in America, live in any country you feel where cats are food. In Western and most European cultures, pets are not food.

2) Those of who claim there is no problem with this overlook the very sadistic fact he is filming this for shock effect or out of his own sadistic pleasure. He knew it was not 'right'.

There are plenty NON pets available for a Python's diet. All which are standard.
Even if this was done in a country where cats are eaten and it is acceptable in their culture, he would still be wrong because it's not a native food source.

Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow
reply to post by iamusic

 

It's totally the same guy IMO. His name is Luka Magnotta.

I just googled him. Yeah it is exactly the same guy. He lives in Canada? They must not have really good laws against this. I would have to look at the pictures(Not the video) again to be certain...but they said he was a bi sexual porn star which means he probably is a little unstable...mentally speaking...not because he is bi just because the porn industry is very very abusive...sorry to be ot.