It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by smarterthanyou
reply to post by LiveToSpendIt
lol. name calling. did the little troll get butthurt?
Originally posted by LiveToSpendIt
You mean we have been waiting up until 300 hrs and the OP posted a pic of a blimp?
Originally posted by jamdan
reply to post by VeniVidi
Sorry, but in all my time lurking on here I have never thought "Oh this MOB is chasing down this poor soul, how awful." Please read rogerstiger's post and tell me if there's anything in that which is disagreeable to you, though I strongly disagree with his assertion that you will "still be called a hoaxer". Help the forum by providing pertinent information.edit on 4-12-2011 by jamdan because: (no reason given)edit on 4-12-2011 by jamdan because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Norry
reply to post by VeniVidi
People (the mob) want the truth mate,nothing but the truth! In order to establish the truth people need to ask questions.Too hot in the kitchen ? then don't post! That people have wasted 10 pages on this # is beyond belief ! Hard to not imagine sometimes that the OP of whatever post, is not sitting nude at their computer fiddling with their genitals, wondering how many pages they can string people along for !
post by tomra
On topic! May i remind all those who favor the blimp "theory" that the OP stated in his opening post that the object "shot out of sight". I never seen a blimp move but they doesnt seem capable of shooting out of sight, do they?
Meaning, at a moments notice, I could not see it
Originally posted by tomra
reply to post by gortex
Could be you are right on both accounts. We don´t know that for sure which obviously also is why the OP posted in the first place as he was unable to recognize the object himself. I do agree that the image resembles that posted of the airship but i cannot prove it was an airship so to me it still is unidentified..
Originally posted by Zaphod
Originally posted by tomra
reply to post by gortex
Could be you are right on both accounts. We don´t know that for sure which obviously also is why the OP posted in the first place as he was unable to recognize the object himself. I do agree that the image resembles that posted of the airship but i cannot prove it was an airship so to me it still is unidentified..
So, in short, no amount of evidence will make you happy. The fact that the exact blimp in question (the Sanyo one that glows white with the red under) was in San Diego this week (proved by photos and a news article) aren't enough eh? What exactly would be enough proof?