It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Wheelindiehl
I would have to say that the heart of the Earth and it's blood would be the core and the magma that flows throughout the Earth rather than rivers and streams
Originally posted by nOraKat
I had the same idea on a mushroom trip one day.
Gaia theory was first put forth by James Lovelock and later developed and investigated by Lynn Margulis and maybe Dorion Sagan.
---
I'm not too sure about the "ancients knew better" theory. Egyptian history was riddled with war.
I think maybe a good example to follow would be the early Indus civilization. I heard from the archeology in that region, it was determined that there was a very long period of peace. They could not find any traces of weapons, for the entire period. It was a large and sophisticated modern civilization comparable to Sumeria, only without the war.
Some view humans like a cancer, since cancer cells act for their own selfish purpose without any regard for the well being of the whole organism (not that the cells are acting consciously).
Originally posted by Ozvaldo
The best way to ignore the God Squad is to ignore their posts. After all, that is what they do when they are backed into a corner, and scientific evidence about the Earth and evolution is presented to them. Don't get me wrong, they will argue into the cows come home, but eventually when the TRUTH is proved they will just ignore you.
I have read the OP 3 times now and am still enjoying it, don't let the GS ruin this very well put together thread!
Originally posted by Maybeboo
If you live near any nature at all, just go and look at it. In your small corner of this small planet teeming with life.
To think that the whole thing is not working on similar lines is the ridiculous theory.
To think that most people think we are the 'pinnacle' of this universal evolution cracks me up every time.
Oooh, maybe we can manage the universe in the same glib and ignorant way as we manage this planet.
In years gone by the arguments were ' how many angels will fit on the head of a pin', an esoteric question by those who pretend to know the nature of the universe. Now the question has become ' how much destruction can we wreak by smashing something that will fit on the head of a pin'. How much 'stuff' can we remove from the body of our host (and no one seems to consider the possibility that we may indeed kill said host) to make our lives easier.
But the bigger question is : whatever the model, we are a part of it, maybe our destructive nature is all part of the smooth working of said model, we are a product of said mcro/macro cosmic lifecycle. (hehe and here we are only talking about the obvious 'seen' effect we and other lifeforms have.)
Ok, I will stop rambling now, but nice post OP, thanks.
Originally posted by nOraKat
Gaia theory was first put forth by James Lovelock and later developed and investigated by Lynn Margulis and maybe Dorion Sagan.
---
I'm not too sure about the "ancients knew better" theory. Egyptian history was riddled with war.
I think maybe a good example to follow would be the early Indus civilization. I heard from the archeology in that region, it was determined that there was a very long period of peace. They could not find any traces of weapons, for the entire period. It was a large and sophisticated modern civilization comparable to Sumeria, only without the war.
---
Some view humans like a cancer, since cancer cells act for their own selfish purpose without any regard for the well being of the whole organism (not that the cells are acting consciously).
Sometimes the cancer wins, and sometimes it loses. I guess it depends on how fit the body is (both physically and "spiritually").edit on 5-12-2011 by nOraKat because: (no reason given)edit on 5-12-2011 by alien because: ...mention of drug-taking removed...
Originally posted by ell8u
mmmmm I think you are forgetting the fact that the earth is made up of rock and theres molten lava under the crust?
what about the sun :l what would that be?
yes the earth could be considered a livving creature but its just like we know trees are alive in a sense.
it is possible that our universe is a unimaginal creatures brain and we are just a cell.. .but at the same time it could be how it is? Alot of people are brought up to believe in magic/santa/fairy/boogie-monsters only to find out its not real and i think it has created a world where pyschologically we are all trying to find that magic/excitement/the unkown.
trees were the result of algae
Our water systems were a result of rain and streams
and what about all the other planets in the solar system
even if all this was true there was nothing we could do about it except do our jobs as whatever a good organism job entitles. If you proved this right by some means of impossible means what would that do to us as a species? you would basically be confirming that all religions are wrong and nothing we do is relevant except just to live and die for some larger organism ...and personally thats a disturbing thought for me. I'm pretty sure our cells dont question its actions it just does it because its designed to. **EDIT** Can I just point out i have no faith in any religion and being blunt i think it is a very primitive instinct to believe in such a thing - but unfortunatly some people just cannot function without the hope that they are under protection constantly from some higher being or that death isn't the end .... of course I cannot disprove religion nor do I care to even try because just like a baby if you take away the pacifier that comforts them they start screaming and crying.
I'm not sure what my point is here except i would be interested in what arguments people have against my opinions or whether people agree that of course there are theories as to what everything is about ...but then there is just plain ridiculous imoedit on 6-12-2011 by ell8u because: Added text
The nations were angry, and Your wrath has come,
And the time of the dead, that they should be judged,
And that You should reward Your servants the prophets and the saints,
And those who fear Your name, small and great,
And should destroy those who destroy the earth (Revelation 11:18).
Originally posted by RevelationGeneration
reply to post by Ozvaldo
You do realize that the idea of evolution is really a Pagan creation belief. ?
And that is why Evolution competes with religion so well, because it is a religion...
As a Christian I am glad to not be apart of any religion. Christianity is relationship not religion. In religion humanity seeks God, Christianity inverts the process: as a loving Father, God reaches for humanity.