It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
It was stated that Adam Seth and Enoch devised mazzaroth to pass on these prophecies that the posers and imposters used to decieve man to sway worship from Yah to themselves.
Originally posted by RevelationGeneration
Also, consider that no one else has done what Jesus has done. No one else has risen from the dead, calmed storms, raised others from the dead, and fulfilled numerous prophecies, etc. Though some may have claimed to be able to do one or two of these things, none have done all the things Christ has done as well as claim divinity. Since Christ has done all of these things and since He claims to be God in flesh, then it is logical to believe what He has said... that He is the only way.
Originally posted by arpgme
Originally posted by Beamish
reply to post by GmoS719
To say "Sex wasn't involved" would suggest that Sex COULD be involved.
Are you being serious? When I said:
Unless someone had sex with a rock
did you think I was suggesting it was a possibility?
The point of the matter is the concept.
Mithra and Jesus were allegedly both born without procreation having taken place.
Virgin can have several meanings, not just in relation to sex.
being the first or happening for the first time
www.thefreedictionary.com...
So with that in mind, Mithra having been born of a rock – which was a first – then his is a virgin birth.
Which is Incorrect. So VIRGIN can not be applied to a rock.
It is correct. And it can be applied.
But obviously not if you are devout Christian.
OK, you can call a birth from a rock a virgin birth if you want, it still does not relate to Jesus. Only he was born of a virgin HUMAN mother...
Originally posted by lilowl53
I tend to go for the notion that Jesus is actually the "sun" and not the"son". 12 Disciples, 12 constellations in the zodiac, Sirius...etc.
Ok, so if Jesus represents the Sun (Leo), and The virgin marry represents the Virgo, why is it that Jesus (Leo) came from The Virgin Marry (Virgo), does that make any chronological sense to you?
Also, if Jesus is the Sun and Jesus had 12 deciples, why is it that the 12 deciples doesn't have the 12 qualities of the different zodiac signs? One of them was a tax collector, which zodiac sign does THAT represent?
It's scary that an Atheist would say that even with evidence they still wouldn't believe because they already came to a "conclusion". VERY scary indeed. It's sort of like the ultra religious people...
Even though I found out that Jesus existed, I'm not sure what to make of it... There can be a number of conclusions to make here, but at least I'M being open minded and admitting that he DID in fact exist...
"to bind up"
That's one of the many meanings of the word religion (from Lactantius, who decided to side-step etymology), but there are others you neglected to mention. When delving into the meaning(s) of religio (the latin origin of religion) even the Romans couldn't decide on a single definition... at least not at first. From Cicero: Religio was taken from the verb relegere, which means "to read and re-read text", making religion a word for describing the works of scholars.
It took the Romans, who in conquering the world were forced to become its first anthropologists, to realize that behind all this multifariousness was something about which it was possible to generalize. From its original meaning of “punctilious respect for the sacred,” religio came to denote any comprehensive human system of organizing and expressing such respect. Religio was, Cicero finally wrote, cultus deorum, “the worship of the gods.”
Islam is one of the three Abrahamic religions (as are Christianity and Judaism). The God is the same. The difference stems from the mortal element, ie> Jesus, Muhammad, Moses, etc.
Interesting side bar: Most everyone goes to hell when they die. I say "most everyone" because there are plenty of people who never rest in a grave upon death, due to circumstance. In case you missed my previous posts on this matter, or missed the clues in the previous sentence, "Hell" translates literally into grave. Nothing more, nothing less. Hell is a place where dead people are placed.
Originally posted by RevelationGeneration
Actually Hell is a place of eternal fire and punishment the scriptures clearly tell us that. Although Hell is one of those subjects that makes people uncomfortable (hence why scoffers always accuse christians of preaching hate) hell is definitely taught in the Bible.
A few of things wrong with this:
1) Paganism isn't a religion, hence it cannot be a "false religion."
2) Lucifer, in angelic theology, isn't the deceiver; it's Azazel.
3) Paganistic peoples pre-date Christianity. Did they borrow these "copy'd [copied] things" via time machine?
1. Paganism is a mystery religion that began at Babel where Satan could be
worshipped in secret as many still believed in the true God of Noah. Babylon is the cradle of ancient paganism.
2. Lucifer is the angel of light, that led the rebellion in heaven with the other angels, he is Satan the deceiver although he has many deceivers working for him, I don't know if Azazel is Satan, but they all have the same agenda so it doesn't matter.
3. So do you think Adam and Eve were pagan? Paganistic beliefs were made by man in opposition. Nothing predates YHWH. Jesus was also around before creation.
Originally posted by LunaKat
Originally posted by RevelationGeneration
Also, consider that no one else has done what Jesus has done. No one else has risen from the dead, calmed storms, raised others from the dead, and fulfilled numerous prophecies, etc. Though some may have claimed to be able to do one or two of these things, none have done all the things Christ has done as well as claim divinity. Since Christ has done all of these things and since He claims to be God in flesh, then it is logical to believe what He has said... that He is the only way.
I have been wondering a lot if these miracles are symbolic the way a lot of things in the Bible are symbolic. I keep thinking about the fact that as much as is written of Jesus in the Bible... we are never given a physical description of him at all. The way we wouldn't if a story is mythological. Some would say a physical description isn't important. And I agree..but... when we write about people we always describe them. That is a lot of books in the Bible with no physical description and he came to the world as a man as well as the Son of God. Shouldn't there be one? Its something that bugs me and makes me wonder why?
Originally posted by RevelationGeneration
[
3. So do you think Adam and Eve were pagan? Paganistic beliefs were made by man in opposition. Nothing predates YHWH. Jesus was also around before creation.