It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by djeminy
Originally posted by snowcrash911
Originally posted by trebor451
It is funny, though. Where did Wetblanky and Bubs49 and ThePostExaminer go? Surely its not a coincidence that when such definitive proof is established that they are as screwed up as Hogan's goat - as right as a soup sandwich and as clear as a football bat - all 3 of them disappear. You'd think perhaps they don't have an answer to all this.
"Divine" wind is not the kind of wind I think of when "Capt" Bob Balsamo's name is mentioned.
When the bird hits the ship... as divine as pea soup.
They'll be playing the dodgeridoo and pretending their cretinous questions need answering; they don't. They must present flyover witnesses... en masse. Or go away.
This is called ---> Burden Of Proof
But... they'll probably settle for hit-and-run style defeat denials, and inspirationless script reading. There might be a sorrowed soul among their ranks capable of mustering a meaningless, vapid non-apology apology.... Who knows.
Snowcrash, buddy, mate, dear old bloke, you're completely lost in your old repeated over and over again vitriol.
Never ever have anybody ever heard you saying anything 'good'.
You're your worst enemy 'boy', (which i called you in another thread) and which is true.
You don't seem to understand how things are working.
In order to 'defeat' which is 'good', you had to come up with something you thought might/were even better!
This was/is your usual response:
Derision, ridicule, scorn, sneer, scoff,, and whatever related to that. You thought that this was 'good' so this
was what you thought and did, and was what your understanding of what 'good' is was all about.
You proved this many times, but this then, were the times you truly became a joke, snowcrach.
You never had any understanding that what you did, and do came and come from the Darkest recessed of
your mind.
Snowcrash, you're no good, and you'll only 'appeal' to the lowest denominator in any society.
Truth is not with you, and it probably never will be ..... in this incarnation off yours!
Cheers
.
edit on 18-12-2011 by djeminy because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by BRAVO949
The one thing that they can not argue with is that the Bush Administration...
Remember - the Bush Administration...
...the Bush Administration...
Remember - George Bush...
Originally posted by BRAVO949
You are very right.
The official story supporters are not interested in an honest discussion. They just want to discredit individuals who are trying to determine what really happened.
The one thing that they can not argue with is that the Bush Administration originally refused to hold any investigation of the crimes of 9/11 and then finally when forced to set up a commission they "stocked" it with ringers and suppplied the white-wash buckets and brushes.
Remember - the Bush Administration suggested Henry Kissinger to head the commission. Henry Kissinger, for God's sake?
Once the commission began the Bush Administration blocked every aspect of it.
Remember - George Bush refused to give testimony under oath and had to have Cheney tright beside him during the testimony he did give.
New York Times Bush Limits 9/11 Testimony
The 9/11 Commission was a farce and the majority of the 9/11 Commissions have come out since and said exactly that.
Here on this thread you have deluded official story supporters defending the fraud that was the 9/11 Commission.
They are not interested in facts they are just trying to keep their crumbling world from collapsing.
Originally posted by snowcrash911
Now, if nobody has anything else to say related to the OP, I say we call it a day, hmmm?edit on 18-12-2011 by snowcrash911 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by trebor451
I don't know. I personally wouldn't mind a little accountability from these PfT acolytes who foam at the mouth any time one of these anomalies comes up.
Originally posted by BillPaisleyLoser
Originally posted by trebor451
Originally posted by BillPaisleyLoser
lmao...So this is what "Capt" Bob Balsamo considered professional and ethical behavior. He needs professional help. Seriously.
kawika is the "source" of the file (but not the ultimate source) and he uploaded to our server via FTP... after I gave him access to our server via FTP quite a few months ago.
Maybe you meant Dennis Cimino?
The CLEA2 (at Cleveland) transceiver was operating at a frequency of 130.025MHz and was able to receive a DLBLK from UA93 at 13:03:06 UTC since the transceiver on UA93 was tuned to that frequency at that time. The transceiver on UA93 was then tuned to 136.800MHz and remained on this frequency for the remainder of the flight and therefore the CLEA2 transceiver was unable to communicate with UA93 even when it was flying much closer to the transceiver. The PITC6 (Pittsburgh) transceiver was however operating at 136.800MHz and could therefore communicate with UA93 for the remainder of the flight.
Warren Stutt.
The only unfounded claims around here are the ones that you and Balsamo are touting over there in your sheltered little wonder land where any dissenting voice is promptly muzzled, ridiculed, and abused. Show me where I claimed that RGS locations at such distances had the strongest signal. I'll help you with that; I didn't make such a claim. On the contrary, those signals appeared to be the weakest if the corresponding SSV (Signal Strength Value perhaps?) entries represent what I believe they most likely do.
I've addressed why CLE may not have received the transmissions in case you missed it; congestion. Look again at the mass of aircraft that were over Cleveland airspace during the period in question:
This is one of the busiest hubs in the continental United States and on that morning every dispatcher was messaging every aircraft to warn them of possible cockpit invasion, divert the flights, etc...
Feel free to keep chasing after nothing if you'd like. Upload all the Google Earth images you want and draw lines from RGS locations to the aircraft. They still don't amount to anything in this non-argument.
The ACARS CONFIRMS myth has been debunked.
Deal with it.
All references to the ACARS analysis on our front page and in the Latest News Section of this forum have been removed until those who sourced the material can gather their thoughts on the argument and come to a conclusion.
I have taken way too much heat over something which is apparently way too trivial compared to all our other analysis, when my plate is way too full.
ACARS will be discussed in a new hearing should one ever be allowed in the current "Justice" system under which we live. We already have more than enough evidence for a new investigation without all this BS back and forth bickering we have had to endure regarding ACARS.
This ACARS analysis just hasnt been worth the time, effort and most importantly.... grief, in my opinion. Especially when those who personally attack and libel P4T from behind a mask refuse to confront us directly.
As the old saying goes, you dont get flak unless you're over the target. Certainly you wont find "Czero" or "CrazyNooB" ("booNyzarC") coming here to confront us regarding aircraft speed or other topics we have covered as they (Czero" and "CrazyNooB/booNyzarC") were already crushed on UM regarding such topics, until one of our representatives was banned without warning.
Apparently they are too paranoid I may track their IP (yet they can knock on my door if they look me up at faa.gov...and they call us paranoid... go figure). Not surprisingly... they arent aware of anonymous proxy servers. (or perhaps they are, but cllearly too much of a coward for debate)
Sergio, feel free to open your own blog under your own name if you wish to pursue this further. We at P4T are done with this analysis for now.
When you get the time, you may want to ask yourself why Stutt continually refuses to address the questions which destroy his theories.
Thread closed.
Originally posted by snowcrash911
Pile-its for 9/11 Truth have just provisionally retracted their ACARS claim.
Quoting Rob 'too much garlic' Balsamo:
All references to the ACARS analysis on our front page and in the Latest News Section of this forum have been removed until those who sourced the material can gather their thoughts on the argument and come to a conclusion.
bunch of "Capt" Bob's whining snipped...
Apparently, in Rob's universe, trotting out the "FLAK" analogy...when you're wrong, you must be right.
Unapologetic to the bitter end.