It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by EspyderMan
reply to post by OldCorp
ATS Videos cannot be seen on IE9 or Firefox 6, newest chrome or any compatibility modes.
Do you have any proof that you spoke to someone in that country?
Russia , is VERY far behind the US in technology. We picked up a Russian submarine following our carrier group near Persian Gulf. We fained deaf because the weaker our enemies think we are ... the better when we are attacked.
Pendulums have also had their share of controversy throughout history. During the Cold War in the 1960's, American dowser Verne Cameron was invited by the government of South Africa to use his pendulum to help them locate their country's precious natural resources, but he was denied a passport by the U.S. government. A few years earlier, he had demonstrated his special dowsing talent to the U.S. Navy, successfully map dowsing (locating on a map) every submarine in the Navy's fleet. He shocked Navy officials by not only locating every American submarine, but also every Russian submarine in the world. Afterwards, the CIA determined that Cameron was a risk to national security, and he was forbidden to leave the United States.
www.pendulums.com...
Russia , is VERY far behind the US in technology
Originally posted by OldCorp
I was speaking to one of the leaders of a Syrian opposition group via Skype earlier tonight (no I won't say who it is, you'll have to wait for the next episode of The Truth Is Viral) and we were discussing possible Russian involvement should NATO take an overt role in enforcing the no-fly zone, a "Red Line" the Russians have said they will not allow to be crossed.
It's going to be problematic enough to keep the Russians out. Turkey, a NATO country, will be taking the lead in the no-fly zone under the auspices of the Arab League - to which Turkey does not belong. In an interview with NATO, I was told that "NATO" is staying out of this one aside from logistical support for the Turks. Exactly how that is supposed to convince the Russians this is not a NATO operation is beyond me; but I guess we'll see how this shakes out one way or another, because we're on an E ticket ride and there ain't no getting off.
Originally posted by hotbread
Originally posted by OldCorp
I was speaking to one of the leaders of a Syrian opposition group via Skype earlier tonight (no I won't say who it is, you'll have to wait for the next episode of The Truth Is Viral) and we were discussing possible Russian involvement should NATO take an overt role in enforcing the no-fly zone, a "Red Line" the Russians have said they will not allow to be crossed.
It's going to be problematic enough to keep the Russians out. Turkey, a NATO country, will be taking the lead in the no-fly zone under the auspices of the Arab League - to which Turkey does not belong. In an interview with NATO, I was told that "NATO" is staying out of this one aside from logistical support for the Turks. Exactly how that is supposed to convince the Russians this is not a NATO operation is beyond me; but I guess we'll see how this shakes out one way or another, because we're on an E ticket ride and there ain't no getting off.
A no fly zone in Syria will not just be pointless but a complete waste of time, and I doubt that any country wants to waste their resources on such a dangerous and ineffective mission.
Plus your comments about the Syrian military capabilities and Russian intervention are highly exaggerated, wrong and unrealistic.
edit on 25-11-2011 by hotbread because: reduced quote size
Originally posted by OldCorp
Originally posted by hotbread
Originally posted by OldCorp
I was speaking to one of the leaders of a Syrian opposition group via Skype earlier tonight (no I won't say who it is, you'll have to wait for the next episode of The Truth Is Viral) and we were discussing possible Russian involvement should NATO take an overt role in enforcing the no-fly zone, a "Red Line" the Russians have said they will not allow to be crossed.
It's going to be problematic enough to keep the Russians out. Turkey, a NATO country, will be taking the lead in the no-fly zone under the auspices of the Arab League - to which Turkey does not belong. In an interview with NATO, I was told that "NATO" is staying out of this one aside from logistical support for the Turks. Exactly how that is supposed to convince the Russians this is not a NATO operation is beyond me; but I guess we'll see how this shakes out one way or another, because we're on an E ticket ride and there ain't no getting off.
A no fly zone in Syria will not just be pointless but a complete waste of time, and I doubt that any country wants to waste their resources on such a dangerous and ineffective mission.
Plus your comments about the Syrian military capabilities and Russian intervention are highly exaggerated, wrong and unrealistic.
edit on 25-11-2011 by hotbread because: reduced quote size
I backed up my claims, how about you back up yours.
Originally posted by hotbread
Originally posted by OldCorp
Originally posted by hotbread
Originally posted by OldCorp
I was speaking to one of the leaders of a Syrian opposition group via Skype earlier tonight (no I won't say who it is, you'll have to wait for the next episode of The Truth Is Viral) and we were discussing possible Russian involvement should NATO take an overt role in enforcing the no-fly zone, a "Red Line" the Russians have said they will not allow to be crossed.
It's going to be problematic enough to keep the Russians out. Turkey, a NATO country, will be taking the lead in the no-fly zone under the auspices of the Arab League - to which Turkey does not belong. In an interview with NATO, I was told that "NATO" is staying out of this one aside from logistical support for the Turks. Exactly how that is supposed to convince the Russians this is not a NATO operation is beyond me; but I guess we'll see how this shakes out one way or another, because we're on an E ticket ride and there ain't no getting off.
A no fly zone in Syria will not just be pointless but a complete waste of time, and I doubt that any country wants to waste their resources on such a dangerous and ineffective mission.
Plus your comments about the Syrian military capabilities and Russian intervention are highly exaggerated, wrong and unrealistic.
edit on 25-11-2011 by hotbread because: reduced quote size
I backed up my claims, how about you back up yours.
Speak to Nato first before you can say that you've backed up your claims
\
Originally posted by OldCorp
If the interview doesn't air - which it will - THEN you can make disparaging remarks, my credibility will be shot, and I'll be chased off of ATS with pitchforks and torches.
Originally posted by OldCorp
I think you're onto something brother. Russia has a new attitude as of late, and they don't seem to want to back down. Still, I doubt that they will get into a shooting match with the U.S. over Syria.