It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
"Though the damage in the hull was 220 to 245 feet long, the most recent evidence shows that there was only a 12 square foot opening,the size of a refrigerator,in the hull allowing water inside the ship"...Hmmmmm...I knew it !
Originally posted by Aliensun
reply to post by blocula
As I recall from the video of a few years ago of the ship, that mere "gash" was over a hundred feet long. No torpedo or interior explosion will leave that type of evidence. Unless you want to invent a conspiracy of coverup for this event, you gotta go with the evidence.
Confusion about the condition of the ship itself remained until the wreck was discovered. Most experts thought that a large gash had been torn in the side. Some eyewitnesses reported that the ship broke apart as it sank, but most shipbuilders dismissed that as impossible. The wreckage revealed that the ship did break apart, and there does not seem to be a gash after all, only small holes.
Originally posted by CosmicWaterGate
reply to post by blocula
... I Can RV-SEE... that there was a low amount of 'tryptophane'...
In Ur 'Heritage' turkey... U-B AWOKEN ONE
U-are-deffinitly-on-target-But-humans-never-learn-to-invent-the-
PING)))))-PING)))))-PING)))))-> )sonar(... before the >radar
Originally posted by blocula
And radar was first proven and tested in use in...guess where?...Germany!...in 1904...
Someone earlier said that a survivor "heard" metal scraping ice...Well then how did this survivor already know what massive sheets of metal sliding against giant chunks of floating ice sounds like,how did she know that is what she "heard",having never heard massive sheets of metal sliding against giant chunks of ice before?
Originally posted by dcmb1409
You guys are probably correct. All survivors under massive shock and can't recall personal events, toss it out the window. Modern surveys support shocked crew's reports, toss it out the window. engineering papers are after all just theories, toss it out the window. Only conclusion is below.
Probably was a German torpedo.
The same reason they sank the 787ft long Lusitania passenger liner in 1915...they felt like it...
Originally posted by stumason
Before anyone can entertain such a daft theory (and it is..It has been pretty much proven this ship hit an iceberg..the conspiracy is actually whether this was the Titanic that sank) then you need to answer one question..
WHY WOULD A GERMAN U-BOAT ATTACK A BRITISH FLAGGED PASSENGER LINER IN 1912?
Think about it...
Originally posted by blocula
I presented enough information,facts and figures in my opening statement to give creedence to the very real possibility that the Titanic was sunk by a German Submarine launched torpedo.
Originally posted by scotsdavy1
this place would have a conspiracy if someone went to the toilet and couldn`t pee!
for goodness sake, think before you open another one.edit on 24-11-2011 by blocula because: (no reason given)