It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Obamanomics Doomed to FAILURE! Socialism Simply Does Not WORK

page: 5
17
<< 2  3  4   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 2 2011 @ 09:12 AM
link   
Ok, when people are going to stop calling Obama a socialist when by now 3 years in the presidential office has shown that he is NOT a socialist but a corporate whore.

Give up people, the truth is in the pudding, I mean Bailouts including the EU.

People just can not give up.

edit on 2-12-2011 by marg6043 because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 2 2011 @ 11:48 AM
link   

Originally posted by marg6043
Ok, when people are going to stop calling Obama a socialist when by now 3 years in the presidential office has shown that he is NOT a socialist but a corporate whore.

Give up people, the truth is in the pudding, I mean Bailouts including the EU.

People just can not give up.


Agreed. It's beyond any belief that anyone would call Obama a socialist.

Is that a FOX News brainwash or something?



posted on Dec, 2 2011 @ 11:55 AM
link   
reply to post by buddhasystem
 


I used to be a fan of Fox News back in the 90s, when I think they were actually fun to watch, but then during the 2000 something change, they got bought up, I have not watch fox for about 10 years and I am not kidding.




posted on Dec, 2 2011 @ 12:08 PM
link   
if there was not some form of socialism in the U.S....we wouldn't have a country called America. even corporations were originally set up to socialize loses.
ideally, you want controlled and regulated capitalism, with socialized safety nets for the rest of the population. if the majority of people's living conditions become desperate enough, they simply rise up and kill off the wealthy...a repeated history over thousands of years.
you would think they would teach that in business schools.



posted on Dec, 3 2011 @ 01:54 AM
link   

Originally posted by macman

I believe "HillaryCare" was before "RomneyCare".


I don't recall Hillary Clinton being elected to a position where she even had the authority to introduce legislation.



posted on Dec, 3 2011 @ 06:31 AM
link   

Originally posted by ILikeStars

Originally posted by macman

I believe "HillaryCare" was before "RomneyCare".


I don't recall Hillary Clinton being elected to a position where she even had the authority to introduce legislation.


It was not needed, as she had Bill's testies in her purse.

But, she did push for the old "Hillary-Care" when he was in office.




top topics
 
17
<< 2  3  4   >>

log in

join