It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by dontreally
reply to post by cetaphobic
What are you talking about? Did i say anything in my post about being anti-Muslim? Are you implying that Israel - A democratic SECULAR (nonreligious) government, doesn't grant equal rights of worship to Muslims, Christians, as much as they do Jews???
I'm not anti-Muslim, and in fact, i am confident that i know much more than you or most of the other posters here about Islam. I have a collection of books on Islam, Sufism, and i have a great respect and love for Muslims. HOWEVER, i am not going to ignore the existence of Islamism or the fact of the Muslim Brotherhood and its official stance on Israel, or, Hamas and Hezbollah - both of which are FUNDED by the state of Iran, or the statements made since the Iranian revolution by the Ayatollah Khomeni, and more recently, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, about the need to see Israel - referred to as the "Zionist Regime" - "Vanish from the pages of time".
Iran has already been at war with Israel through its proxies Hezbollah and Hamas. So, what is Israel supposed to do about this?? Iran according to the recent IAEA report on Iran's nuclear program “The report gives detailed information - some new - suggesting that Iran conducted computer modeling of a kind that would only be relevant to a nuclear weapon.” ....Other items in the report which lead to the belief Iran is interested in developing a nuclear weapon include research into “high-speed electronic switches and spark gaps – useful for triggering and firing detonators – and radiation detection and measuring equipment”..
So Israel to just sit aside until Tel Aviv gets nuked? Because this is what is feared, and appears highly plausible. Whether Iran does it themselves or terrorists get a hold of a nuclear weapon and deploy it in Israel doesnt matter. Radical, Islamist governments NEED to be opposed, and frankly, it is nothing short of absurd that a pagan liberal such as yourself would support a government who wouldnt let you walk around without a hijab, or let you out beyond 6 PM without your husband to accompany you.
As usual, it is propaganda, the type that seems to pervade the minds of idealistic liberals who could care less about any information that upsets their support for a popular and cliched stance "against oppression".
Originally posted by dontreally
reply to post by cetaphobic
Where do you get the idea that "Israel is just as bloodthirsty as Iran"???
First and foremost, you realize Iran is a theocracy, right? In Iran, women are not allowed on the streets without a man after 6 PM.
Second, if any country is capable of making good on the Islamo-fascist desire to see Israel "vanish from the pages of time", its a nuclear armed Iran.
Until Iran acknowledges Israels right to exist - which they and almost every other Muslim government, barring Uzbekistan, has failed to do, Israel has to do whatever is in within their power to prevent Iran from getting the power they seek by having a nuclear weapon.
Iran also sponsors holocaust denial conferences. Its major politicians routinely call the holocaust a forgery, and essentially assign every evil in the world to Zionism i.e. Jews. Its minister of public relations said Joseph Stalin, and Vladamir Lenin were Jewish - when they are not Jewish. Its a completely anti-Jewish government, opposed, just like the rest of the Muslim world, not to any imaginative crimes leveled against Israel, but the sheer presence of a Jewish state in the midst of the political body of Dar Al Islam.
Originally posted by dontreally
reply to post by Expat888
You people are MAD!
Instead of accepting them? Are you a satanist? Israel was granted a tiny ass plot of land in the northeast of Palestine in 1947. The Arabs of Palestine (the western half) were granted 80%, Judea, Samaria, the Negev, Gaza, and parts of the Galilee. Did they accept it?
When Israel proclaimed this tiny allotment their own state, what did the Arabs do? 6 Arab nations assembled and attacked the tiny Jewish state, just 5 years after the holocaust.
Again, in '67, the Arabs, led by Egypt and Jordan, attacked Israel.
Where the # do you get this bull# that Israel is butchering the Palestinians, when every major war, in '48, '67, and '73, was initiated by the Arabs. Even the issue of Palestinian refugees, is a blatant creation of the Arab league - BLATANT, and everyone knows it - to create world sympathy for the Palestinian cause.
The entire thing of a Palestinian people, of Israel oppresing the Palestinians, is a myth! and it is absolutely nauseating to read the filth that pours forth from the minds of the people who post here. Ignoramuses. none of you have probably even read a book on the subject, yet you obnoxiously reply in your ignorance as if you have any knowledge of merit to do so.
Originally posted by WeirdFuture77
Does anyone seriously believe anything Iran says after its leader publicly commented that homosexuals do not exist in Iran a few years back. Yeah...right.
If you don't like the fact that homosexuality is not big in Iran, than live somewhere else where it is if you're so concerned.
Originally posted by ipleadthe5th
reply to post by dontreally
Until Iran acknowledges Israels right to exist - which they and almost every other Muslim government, barring Uzbekistan, has failed to do, Israel has to do whatever is in within their power to prevent Iran from getting the power they seek by having a nuclear weapon.
And Israel refuses to acknowledge the existence of Palestine so does that mean the Palestinians and Hamas have every right to attack Israel ???
Israel DOES have nukes...
Or as usual, does it only work for Israel.
Originally posted by IsraeliGuy
How convenient. Justify execution of homosexuals with the fact that it's what the majority wants.
I suppose this majority justification also applies to Israel, yes? Whenever Israel invades Gaza - it's what the majority wants, and we're not going to change because you want it.
Also, how very nice of you to say
If you don't like the fact that homosexuality is not big in Iran, than live somewhere else where it is if you're so concerned.
But somehow I get the feeling that, if I say something like "If you don't like the fact that Israel is a Jewish country, then live somewhere else if you're so concerned", the same logic would somehow not apply. Suddenly it will become a fascist thing to say. But not when dealing with Iran.
Simply laughable.
Originally posted by Dimitri Dzengalshlevi
Please explain what a comment about "no homosexuals in Iran" has to do with executing them? Because that seems like quite a sensationalist interpretation to me.
And since when does commenting on individual sexual preference suddenly turn into comments about Jews?