It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by studio500
I'm sorry but that "dude" got treated correctly by what is considered to be robust policing.
He was told to move several times and remained defiant. What did he expect was going to happen?
Did he think he was going to be handed a bunch of flowers, a handshake and a "it's ok friend, we're only playing" apology from the Police!
If he wasn't doing what he was doing the incident wouldn't have happened. No point crying after the event.
Originally posted by mr-lizard
www.guardian.co.uk...
It just gets worse and worse - these armed, uniformed cowards who are defending the corporations think very little of beating up journalists, old women, war vets, students, protesters and the hundreds of other types of people who are lawfully demonstrating their right to protest.
The link included contains a video.
It contains bad language and can be considered quite shocking. (Unless of course you actively enjoy seeing unarmed people beaten up).
Protester and three-tour American veteran Kayvan Sabehgi was beaten by Oakland police during the Occupy protest's general strike on 2 November. Sabehgi, who was 'completely peaceful', according to witnesses, was left with a lacerated spleen
Kudos to the lady at the end and the camera guy.
'Are you going to shoot me whilst i'm filming you?'
'Did any of you want to deliberately hurt the war vet?'
Originally posted by LifeIsPeculiar
reply to post by e11888
This is a FREE nation. You sir are wrong.
He wasn't resisting arrest. He refused to follow a cop's orders. With that act, he broke the law.
He should be ashamed of himself, since he was in violation of his oath. If he was standing in solidarity with the OWS people, he was standing in solidarity with communists.
Originally posted by LifeIsPeculiar
reply to post by DJDigitalGem
Why should he have to move??
Because the police asked him to move. The police are authorized by We The People to enforce the law with force if necessary. There is no reason to defy the police. This has been the case throughout history in all Nations. Why would it be different in this case?
Another matter: The vet took an Oath to defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic. If we was throwing his lot in with the OWS people, he was joining people who have clearly indicated that they hope to replace the current government with a socialist/communist government where people's wealth are distrubuted in a manner pleasing to the OWS people. He violated his oath.
Originally posted by jude11
* * * is it really necessary to mention that he is a veteran? * * * he's just a man.
That vet was defending the constitution
Originally posted by LifeIsPeculiar
reply to post by dubiousone
That vet was defending the constitution
He was hanging out with people whose signs clearly call for the destruction of the govenment that was established by the Constitution. I guess you didn't bother to read the signs or see the people walking on the US flag.
He was doing averything BUT defending the Constitution.
Do you have any evidence to support that assertion?
Originally posted by LifeIsPeculiar
reply to post by dubiousone
Do you have any evidence to support that assertion?
There are plenty of threads on this site that show pictures of the communist banners, the signs calling for the destruction of the government, and people walking on an American flag. Those people were not ejected from the movenment; and, that indicates solidarity with those who bore those signs. The solidier in question was in solidarity with the mob. What more connectivity do you need?edit on 11/21/2011 by LifeIsPeculiar because: Remove redundant woring.
reply to post by Screwed
So when the first cop gets killed (and you know it's coming) Yes I do and I can't wait.
Originally posted by RationalDespair
I don't know why I keep reading these threads. It makes me so depressed to see this kind of behaviour in the first place, but what really upsets me are the people actually defending the position of the police here. Can't you get it in your heads that the police has no business there at all?
Originally posted by PrimalRed
Originally posted by RationalDespair
I don't know why I keep reading these threads. It makes me so depressed to see this kind of behaviour in the first place, but what really upsets me are the people actually defending the position of the police here. Can't you get it in your heads that the police has no business there at all?
Nope, police shouldn't be there.
And in case you did not know smashing windows, starting fires and spray painting stuff on other people's property is not "free speech"