It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by moondoggy2
It's all about controlling the Middle East, and getting oil. Same reason The U.S. invaded Iraq, and Libya. They were also behind the riots/protests in Egypt and Yemen.
Onnce you control the oil, you control the world.... Because God knows, an alternative will NEVER become public. Too much money, in too few hands..... And with that money, people can, and will be easily bought off. Everyone has a price.
Originally posted by moondoggy2
It's all about controlling the Middle East, and getting oil. Same reason The U.S. invaded Iraq, and Libya. They were also behind the riots/protests in Egypt and Yemen.
Onnce you control the oil, you control the world.... Because God knows, an alternative will NEVER become public. Too much money, in too few hands..... And with that money, people can, and will be easily bought off. Everyone has a price.
Originally posted by jibeho
1994 Bombing of Jewish Center in Buenos Aires linked to Iranian Qods Force commander and Hezbollah. Qods are well established in Latin America.
BBC News reported that Ahmad Vahidi had become Iran's defense minister-designate under the 2009 Mahmoud Ahmadinejad administration, he is on Interpol's wanted list over the 1994 AMIA bombing. Vahidi led a unit of Iran's Revolutionary Guard called Quds Force at the time of the attack, and has been accused of planning the bombings. Iran dismissed this development as a "Zionist plot".
Mr Vahidi - who was deputy defence minister during Mr Ahmadinejad's first term in office - is accused of involvement in the bombing of the Israeli-Argentine Mutual Association (AMIA) building in Buenos Aires.
It was the worst attack on a Jewish target outside Israel since World War II.
Mr Nisman said that Mr Vahidi, who led a unit of Iran's Revolutionary Guard known as the Quds Force at the time of the attack, was accused of "being a key participant in the planning and of having made the decision to go ahead with the attack" against the AMIA.
"It has been demonstrated that Vahidi participated in and approved of the decision to attack AMIA during the meeting in Iraq on 14 August 1993", the prosecutor said.
news.bbc.co.uk...
Originally posted by neo96
(Reuters) - Iran marked the anniversary of the 1979 seizure of the U.S. embassy on Friday with burning flags and chants of "Death to America," escalating its anti-U.S. rhetoric ahead of the release of a pivotal U.N. report on its nuclear program.
Thousands of students burned the Stars and Stripes, an effigy of Uncle Sam and pictures of President Barack Obama outside the leafy downtown Tehran compound that once housed the U.S. mission.
www.reuters.com...
Here is some more insight for those who live in reality.
Originally posted by purplemer
The Lancet surveys of Iraq War casualties from 2003-2006 estimates 601,027 Iraqi deaths.. Incase you do not know what the lancet is...
... (combatants plus non-combatants) and indirect (due to increased lawlessness, degraded infrastructure, poor healthcare, etc.).
en.wikipedia.org...
Originally posted by purplemer
I recently listened to a radio programme that put the total deaths of the war at well over a million...
"We are by far the most violent nation on earth. We have the highest numbers of rape and murder in the world and incarcerate the greatest percentage of our citizens. We are the largest producer and exporter of weapons of mass destruction and have the world's biggest military budget comprising 36 percent of the total world military spending and gobbling up more than 50 percent of our own national budget" Yellow Times
The USA has the most number of people in prison in the world, at 1.725 million. Next is China with 1.4 million. However China's total population is 4.6 times that of the USA, so the number of people in prison per 100,000 of population is very different: 645 people per 100,000 in the USA, 115 per 100,000 in China. 'Unlawful combatants' held on a military base in someone else's country are not included.
Originally posted by BRAVO949
The more you look into the Buenos Aires bombing the more it looks like a standard Zionist scumbag bastard false-flag operation.
Zionist Jews have a long history of killing other Jews to advance the ideology of hate we know as Zionism and the Buenos Aires case has all the hallmarks of this sort of action.
Remember, Jews killed Jews in Iraq in 1950 to con the innocent Jews in Iraq into migrating to the state of hate we know as Israel.
Originally posted by purplemer
For example it is known the US funded the IRA terrorist organisation that planted many bombs on the UK mainland.. Does that mean the US attacked the UK.. If so it means the US has attacked most nations on earth..
Originally posted by SLAYER69
Originally posted by Unrivaled1
reply to post by SLAYER69
What does that prove? I could show you millions of pictures of injured people and say they where attacked by mary poppins, doesn't make it true though does it
No it doesn't, It does however make it abundantly clear that you are either unaware of the or are in denial of the reality that many here at ATS a few years back witnessed, discussed, debated and argued over.
Those are legitimate images of what really transpired. Just like the video you posted happened. So now which is it? I acknowledged your video, will you accept the factual images of events that transpired in Iran or are you going to be in denial like the rest here defending Iran when it comes to posting facts?
edit on 11-11-2011 by SLAYER69 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by projectvxn
Originally posted by Unrivaled1
reply to post by SLAYER69
What does that prove? I could show you millions of pictures of injured people and say they where injured by mary poppins, doesn't make it true though does it
In Iran many of the protesters were outright SHOT.
Not beaten, not hit with rubber projectiles...but good ole' 7.62x39.
Originally posted by tangonine
Originally posted by Unrivaled1
reply to post by projectvxn
As i recall it IRANS response to the shootings stated that armed protesters where attacking a government building and police or something along those lines
Any particular reason why you think i should believe a lying war mongering government and it's lying warmongering press that serves the bankers over it's own people and not a Sovereign nation that hasn't invaded anyone and rejects the international cabal of bankers?
edit on 11/11/11 by Unrivaled1 because: (no reason given)edit on 11/11/11 by Unrivaled1 because: (no reason given)
So you believe the Iranian government's (and it's state-run media's) account and not the protesters, but in America, you believe the protestors and not the media, is that correct?