It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by GoodOlDave
Originally posted by WetBlanky
... And yes, he also placed the plane on the NoC flight path...and yes, this means he couldn't have and didn't see the plane impact the pentagon...
Ah yes, the "secret government agent" excuse again. Why an I not surprised?
Originally posted by vipertech0596
reply to post by WetBlanky
Stay in la la land if you choose to do so. CIT is a joke.
Norwegian radio link was provided by Turbofan in that thread. I only read it and commented at the time. Jones did say he was writing another paper correcting the shortcomings of the first.
As to your refutations of my energy calculations; I haven't been able to find such. Perhaps you can provide a link to the thread where you think you addressed them.
Jones and Harriet peer reviewed Journal stands very credible;
Originally posted by GoodOlDave
Originally posted by WetBlanky
... And yes, he also placed the plane on the NoC flight path...and yes, this means he couldn't have and didn't see the plane impact the pentagon...
Ah yes, the "secret government agent" excuse again. Why an I not surprised?
Originally posted by pteridine
reply to post by BRAVO949
For your questions regarding the Bush administration, ask George and Dick. Questions as to how much money was spent on investigations should be directed to the funding agency. Here is a list that may be of interest on this thread:
If there is any evidence of demolitions in the WTC or Pentagon that will stand in a court of law, why hasn't it been brought forward?
Why do the truthers support Richard Gage when it is known that his knowledge of structural engineering is poor?
Why is Steven Jones lauded when his paper has been shown to be self inconsistent and generally incorrect? Why is Craig Ranke's strange theory of a flyover considered to be a possibility when his arguments consist entirely of saying everything he disagrees with is faked and the witnesses he doesn't like are lying?
So you are saying that sometime in the past you posted stuff that purportedly showed my calculations to be incorrect but that you can't find it now.
Is this an example of that heresay evidence you talk about or is it just your opinion? Could you redo the calculations if I showed you how to do them?
Of course, we both know that you are desperate to save Jones' tarnished reputation
but you have never refuted my thermodynamic calculations.
Face it, Jones botched the paper.
His analytical protocols are poor and his scientific methodology and reasoning is lacking. As a physicist, he is a bad chemist.
The entire thermite theory falls on its face when one questions what a layer of thermite would do to a building. Nothing much.
Then, when we ask why so much 'thermite' was unburned if it was so active, we don't get an answer.
Then, when we ask why so much 'thermite' was unburned if it was so active, we don't get an answer.
Originally posted by pteridine
reply to post by BRAVO949
An attack on the Maddox DD731 happened in the Gulf of Tonkin on Aug 2, 1964. Maddox was hit once, an F-8 Crusader had a wing damaged and the three torpedo boats were damaged but salvageable. A second event, two days later, claiming a second attack was likely due to false radar returns and the DesDiv2 commander said as much in his report.
How this event effects questioning the 911 attacks is a bit of a stretch.
Originally posted by vipertech0596
reply to post by BRAVO949
The delusion that only 14 million dollars was spent to investigate 9/11, is pure unadulterated BS. The FBI alone spent in excess of 30 million, then there was the CIA, NSA, and a host of other local, state and federal agencies.
Originally posted by WetBlanky
But let's not forget the north of Citgo flight path proves a flyover because the plane on that path cannot cause any of the physical damage. From the 5 light poles(most importantly pole 1) to the generator trailer, to first floor external and internal damage leading to the c ring hole.
Originally posted by impressme
reply to post by pteridine
Again, you have proven your absolute lack of knowledge in the area of Jones’s experiments with “Nano thermite” as published. Obviously, you do not have the ability to comprehend, scientifically, what Jones’ findings.
Now, back to your qualifications…
Why are you so reluctant to provide us with your Bio? Clearly, you constantly imply that you have a professional level of expertise as a chemist / physicist. From which school(s) did you receive your degree(s) and in what field(s)
I would certainly hope that you have not forgotten any of this information pertaining to your education and work experience.
Jones still wins hands down. You have proven nothing but your lack of knowledge.