It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Political Baiting on ATS Getting Out of Hand......

page: 2
5
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 8 2011 @ 03:20 PM
link   
This coming from the dude who called me a fascist the other day and always makes the poster into the topic.

Meh



posted on Nov, 8 2011 @ 03:20 PM
link   
reply to post by sheepslayer247
 


So far its been rather tame around here as compared to the months leading up to the 2008 election.

You'd better put your hip waders on and work on thickening up your skin if you plan on making it through this next year.

I felt just like you when I joined here right before the 2008 election. Over time you just learn when and how to feed or starve the trolls. Those with bad intentions do not last long. Report what you can and move on or simply hit your ignore button. It brings instant calm. Keep your chin up!!



posted on Nov, 8 2011 @ 03:25 PM
link   

Originally posted by sheepslayer247


15g.) Political Baiting: You will not engage in politically-charged rhetoric, politically-inspired name-calling, and related right-versus-left political bickering while Posting in any topical forum or discussion thread on the Websites. You will not alter political candidate names or party affiliations in order to insult or deride the opposition.


Is it just me, or has the political baiting on ATS become a serious issue? I see thread after thread full of posts that contain content just as described in 15g of the T&C. Often times the OP itself is nothing but an attempt to bait people into a thread created just for the sole purpose of espousing rhetoric and nonsense.



I think there should be an ATS golden rule.

"Reply to a post or thread the way you would like to be replied to."

It tells you right when you click on reply to "Please make sure every post matters."



posted on Nov, 8 2011 @ 03:26 PM
link   

Originally posted by sheepslayer247
reply to
 


And the anti-OWS is not?


Absolutely not, it has been all pro-OWS protesters
being mean, vile, hateful, condescending, and disrespectful to ANYONE
who opposes there pro-OWS view.



posted on Nov, 8 2011 @ 03:26 PM
link   

Originally posted by neo96
This coming from the dude who called me a fascist the other day and always makes the poster into the topic.


the irony of this statement astounds me



posted on Nov, 8 2011 @ 03:30 PM
link   
reply to post by neo96
 


You're right Neo. I did say that. You should know by now that I do not shy away from things and that I call it as I see it. I stand by my statement and this thread is indirectly pointed at you and those like you.

I am not trying to make this personal, but your record as a troll and baiter is quite clear to see. So while the truth may hurt, prove that I am wrong.

reply to post by jibeho
 




Over time you just learn when and how to feed or starve the trolls.

I am still learning to just let the trolls be, but it is hard. That's why I have decided to step back for a bit.

reply to post by supine
 





I think there should be an ATS golden rule.

I have tried to follow such an example, and I believe I have a pretty good record on ATS for being fair, truthful and respectful. Actually, I just had my first post removed last week for being off-topic. So I think I have been real good.

reply to post by popsmayhem
 

So the anti-OWS is in no way guilty of baiting and trolling? Do you know how many times I have been called a socialist commie nazi that wants to get down on my knees to bow down to the almighty Obama....just because I support systemic change?

I think you prove my point.
edit on 8-11-2011 by sheepslayer247 because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 8 2011 @ 03:31 PM
link   

Originally posted by monkofmimir

Originally posted by neo96
This coming from the dude who called me a fascist the other day and always makes the poster into the topic.


the irony of this statement astounds me



sheepslayer :Judging by YOUR demeanor, I'd be willing to bet YOU would be the one shooting at Americans.
In that case, see you at the riots!

www.abovetopsecret.com...

WANT TO GO
further down this rabbit hole.??

Didn't think so
edit on 8-11-2011 by popsmayhem because: ]



posted on Nov, 8 2011 @ 03:34 PM
link   
reply to post by popsmayhem
 


I said a few times that I am guilty as well. I do not deny it. But for the sake of truth and fairness, I hope an intelligent person will follow your link and read the entire exchange. They will be able to see how you are no better.




I hope YOU dodge the tear gas canisters!




I think they want a civil war where us good guys have to take the street back and get rid of this comminist scum!!....They might just get there wish though in creating a class war or civil war but when WE TAKE BACK the streets there going to be sent home
crying like babies, take heed, the good people in America can only take so much!!


edit on 8-11-2011 by sheepslayer247 because: (no reason given)

edit on 8-11-2011 by sheepslayer247 because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 8 2011 @ 03:48 PM
link   


look guys/gals/(Internet people of undetermined gender)

I'm starting to feel like I'm in a monty python sketch. Stop making the thread about who's fault it is!

It don't matter, what matters is the issue at hand.

You know that people keep on making threads personal...

and the whole issue of political baiting...
edit on 8-11-2011 by monkofmimir because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 8 2011 @ 03:53 PM
link   
reply to post by monkofmimir
 


I was just defending myself.

At least I have some good examples on this thread to point out the thrust of my OP.



posted on Nov, 8 2011 @ 03:53 PM
link   

Originally posted by sheepslayer247
reply to post by popsmayhem
 


I said a few times that I am guilty as well. I do not deny it. But for the sake of truth and fairness, I hope an intelligent person will follow your link and read the entire exchange. They will be able to see how you are no better.




I hope YOU dodge the tear gas canisters!




I think they want a civil war where us good guys have to take the street back and get rid of this comminist scum!!....They might just get there wish though in creating a class war or civil war but when WE TAKE BACK the streets there going to be sent home
crying like babies, take heed, the good people in America can only take so much!!


edit on 8-11-2011 by sheepslayer247 because: (no reason given)

edit on 8-11-2011 by sheepslayer247 because: (no reason given)



I'm making the posts about US not YOU.

Big difference..



posted on Nov, 8 2011 @ 03:54 PM
link   

Originally posted by sheepslayer247
reply to post by monkofmimir
 


I was just defending myself.

At least I have some good examples on this thread to point out the thrust of my OP.


The only point being no one else is making a hypocritical OP.

Not me not anyone else..



posted on Nov, 8 2011 @ 03:56 PM
link   
Man I totally agree with you OP.

And Mods, I DO report the troll baiting threads. And then when I come back the next day and it's still here I report it again, and again, and rarely does anything happen. I mean when the thread title reads "Atheism is just stoopid" or "liberals are brain-damaged" or "why do people believe the made-up bible" you already know what is going to happen. Why on earth is it allowed to go for 20-some pages of utter BS?



posted on Nov, 8 2011 @ 04:07 PM
link   
reply to post by popsmayhem
 


I thought that I stated a few times that I was guilty as well, and that I was going to step back in an attempt to rectify my involvment.

Is it possible that you are unwilling to admit the same and will continue down the same path because of your inability to grasp the concept of what the OP was about?

reply to post by jjkenobi
 

Exactly!
edit on 8-11-2011 by sheepslayer247 because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 8 2011 @ 04:10 PM
link   
reply to post by sheepslayer247
 


By the perception of the original views of the OP
it was a direct attack against anti-OWS protests.

While Op is hypocritical, in no way have I been.
As I have not started a thread against PRO-OWS views,
under the disguise or mask of an anti-baiting rant.
edit on 8-11-2011 by popsmayhem because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 8 2011 @ 04:15 PM
link   
A thread about political baiting, turns into a thread of political baiting. So i guess the OP has a point. It's been good for me as it's meant i've spent less time on ATS and more time doing something constructive.



posted on Nov, 8 2011 @ 04:22 PM
link   

Originally posted by woodwardjnr
A thread about political baiting, turns into a thread of political baiting. So i guess the OP has a point. It's been good for me as it's meant i've spent less time on ATS and more time doing something constructive.



You will not engage in politically-charged rhetoric, politically-inspired name-calling, and related right-versus-left political bickering


I would not go that far, political baiting is a conservative vs. liberal thing.

This is constructive posting of opposing views. Not political at all.



posted on Nov, 8 2011 @ 04:23 PM
link   
reply to post by popsmayhem
 




By the perception of the original views of the OP it was a direct attack against anti-OWS protests.

I never mentioned OWS in the OP. In fact, OWS was never mentioned until you said this:



The occu pie supporters are very guilty of this recently


/facepalm

reply to post by woodwardjnr
 



It's been good for me as it's meant i've spent less time on ATS and more time doing something constructive.


I suppose it's about time for me to do the same.



posted on Nov, 8 2011 @ 04:25 PM
link   
With a forum called US Political Madness, would anyone expect anything less? It is no different than Fox, Huffington/AOL, politics daily, pick a forum.
The baiting is fine for myself, as long as it is civilized.
edit on 11/8/2011 by mugger because: sp.



posted on Nov, 8 2011 @ 04:27 PM
link   
reply to post by illuminatislave
 



I see rampant political baiting in most OWS related threads


No, No, I beg to differ.

Read post above mine. I am not the only one
who understands the *true* meaning of the OP..

I simply was making an observation as I have already provided
proof in a few posts up from this.


edit on 8-11-2011 by popsmayhem because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
5
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join