Herman Cain's fourth accuser, Sharon Bialek, has a troubled financial past

reply to post by Phoenix


A star for you Phoenix! And kudos for the Larry Sinclair and Kal Penn shout outs...may I add will we EVER learn the name of the "token' rich white girl in one of the two Obama tomes that he 'dropped' because she wasn't 'with the struggle' coming from her privileged background (Haiwaain & Ivy League schooling notwith standing).

This whole Cain Bimbo Eruption is laughable. TWO received severance packages (more fiscally sound than fighting even made up charges); THREE won't permit their names or likenesses released...and 'brave' number FOUR--well her background DOES matter.

Let's start with her choice of attorney. Are you kidding me, Gloria Allred? Are the surviving members of the OJ Defense team ALL busy? How does a poor, unemployed woman from Chicago get GA to rep her? How does that happen???

Thenn we have the "allegation." So distressing was the event she had two friends sign and date affidavits that 'something' happened...but she never told them (per the affidavits!) What happened. Yet, given the alleged forcing of her head towards Cain's crotch, she NEVER considered filing a police report (instead telling friends a vague tale and having them get that notarized). Okay...

Thn there are nine jobs in 17 years (many of which she was "let go from"). Two going on three bankruptcys; financial seizure judgments (from banks and even her physicians) in the last few months and, the paternity of her son was challenged by HER MARRIED MEDIA EXECUTIVE PARAMOUR (who, for some reason, possiblyu thought HE was being shaken down for 21 years of unwarranted child support).

Yeah...she sounds so credible, stable and honest. Let's throw in waiting thirteen plus years (a Senate campaign of her alleged attacker, not to mention his radio career and motivational speaker)...but she "needs" to speak out niw.

Yeah. Who wouldn't believe her?

reply to post by Glinda


Thanks Glinda,

Its only an unsubstatiated blog report at this time but if true its a WHOPPER!

Question, Why was Sharon Bialek fired from NRA?

Answer, False Sexual Harassment Claims!

This according to coworker email to blogger along with comment that Sharon is trouble with a capitol "T" and is a gold digger.

Just have to wait and see if any honest digging or reporting is to be forthcoming from media for a confirmation on this.

If confirmed it will open up something of a conspiracy to take down Cain as a candidate.

Interesting coinky dinky about Axelrod living in same building.



Fired

Kinda funny that a lot of the same people jumping at the opportunity to bash Wiener are now suddenly ok with stuff like that

The hypocricy is strong in this thread

If this is true, then what was Herman thinking of ?

Sharon Bialek just looks like a stereotypical American woman; fake skin, fake nose, fake hair, fake lips, fake teeth, and - more than likely - fake breasts and fake arse.

Surely a man of Herman Cain's standing and stature wouldn't have had to resort to dipping into the bargain basement, unless he was a bit of a perverted control freak... Oh, wait...

Originally posted by MrXYZ
Kinda funny that a lot of the same people jumping at the opportunity to bash Wiener are now suddenly ok with stuff like that

The hypocricy is strong in this thread

Your not getting it:
Wiener: Females don't need force or money to do it
Clinton: Females don't need force or money to do it
Spitzer: Females don't need force to do it

To paraphrase Ann Coulter: "This is why our women are better than theirs"

Originally posted by MrXYZ
Kinda funny that a lot of the same people jumping at the opportunity to bash Wiener are now suddenly ok with stuff like that

The hypocricy is strong in this thread

Kinda funny that Weiner boy admitted his serial dalliances as true after directly lying to his voters faces, when Cain does then you can make your claim. Better luck next time

Who's Larry?

reply to post by Phoenix


Wow...just wow. Pat Dollard (and you Phoenix) gets the award for actual investigative journalism on this. How badly does the strawman, empty suit, historical (or hysterical) President Barack Obama poll to. Warrant THIS amatuer smear job against a genuine, self made, intellectual like Herman Cain???

Makes me think (after seeing the trout pout augmented lips--is the Doc suing Bialek her Plastic Surgeon?) of that icky Clinton era quote of James Carville (re Paula Jones). Jones, per Carville, was "what you get when you drag a $100 bill thru a trailer park.". So what size note was dragged infront of Bialek???

We are watching the desparate implosion of the media AND the DNC.

I lived through four years of harassment at my former employer. It was four of the darkest years of my life, but I was a single mother and the thought of losing my job was terrifying. I knew (and was right) that if I reported it, the 20 year veteran of the company would be protected and I would be the collateral damage. I quietly found another position in another city and left the company. I reported the abuse to my HR department before I left and presented my four years of documented, notarized evidence. The HR dept did their investigation and found no wrongdoing on the part of the veteraned employee. I knew this would be the outcome and is the reason I never reported it before my resignation. I could have pursued it in a court of law, I could have made a huge to-do and demanded compensation, but what would it have done? It would have put me and my children through more hell than we had already been through. I moved away from the abuse and on to a better place, emotionally and financially.

Having lived through my own harassment hell, my first hunch on this woman is that she had an encounter with Cain, most likely it was consensual, and she is now looking for her moment of fame and a financial windfall. Her mannerisms and almost boastful attitude is hard to watch, especially since harassment leaves scars and emotional pain. Either she is hiding that pain incredubly well, or she is looking for her fifteen minutes of fame.

So wait...people take offence at Wiener not admitting right away that he sent a pic of his d*** to a woman he had an affair with, yet when 5 (!!!) women come out, and Cain first says he "doesn't know anything" about it, that's perfectly fine.

Makes perfect sense

If people are so ok with Cain sexually harassing women, maybe we can offer Berlusconi citizenship...he's the uncontested master when it comes to stuff like that

Let me see......

She's broke or has financial troubles. This means that Herman Cain's hand wasn't on her genitals because?????????? He only likes financially stable genitals?

The woman tells it like it happened. Her bank account means nothing when the guy pushed her head into his lap. C'mon.

Originally posted by spinalremain
Let me see......

She's broke or has financial troubles. This means that Herman Cain's hand wasn't on her genitals because?????????? He only likes financially stable genitals?

The woman tells it like it happened. Her bank account means nothing when the guy pushed her head into his lap. C'mon.

It's called grasping at straws

Originally posted by MrXYZ
If people are so ok with Cain sexually harassing women, maybe we can offer Berlusconi citizenship...he's the uncontested master when it comes to stuff like that

Weiner slimy as he is was not convicted by me, he convicted himself as a self admitted liar which is way different than Cain's situation.

As you post you are judge, jury and executioner convincing yourself he actually done something when the facts at this point are its her (dubious we coming to find out) word against his.

You should look in the mirror as you mouth the word hypocritical as you are doing the very thing you accuse others of doing.

I think key info to come out is reason SB was fired at NRA then we shall really see if she's credible. Until then this seems very very politically convenient.

reply to post by MrXYZ


Berlusconi paid didn't he?
I don't think you get the republican seal of approval unless "she was asking for it"

Originally posted by TheWalkingFox
reply to post by beezzer

 

Because it's good for our democracy to know what sort of skeletons are hanging in the closets of our candidates?

Personally, I feel this may be an attempt to get Cain out of the campaign... by the Cain campaign. See, running for president can be very lucrative, especially if you're taking time out to pawn your book. But, and here's the thing, if you get the nomination, suddenly your finances become much more scrutinized, much more restricted. If you run as a hopeful, and then ditch, you get to keep your campaign contributions for "next time."

Cain's making a run with the money, since none of the crazy stuff he's done so far seems to convince voters to ditch him. "I'm the Koch Brothers' brother from another mother," are you kidding me? Unfortunately there's a major miscalculation - the sort of people who make up Cain's newfound "base" tend to be the sort of people who make excuses for rapists, much less sexual harassment (tip - it's always the woman's fault. She's always a lying, hysterical gold-digger who "really wanted it.")

So Cain, faced with his poll numbers not dropping, will either have to ignore the numbers and announce his resignation due to this scandal, or will have to come up with an even wackier scandal (my money is on him suddenly deciding to join Nation of Islam)

edit on 8/11/2011 by TheWalkingFox because: (no reason given)

Except in Bialek's situation, she actually was proven to be a money grubbing liar at least once. The paternity suit not mentioned yet, was by a man claiming he was NOT the father of Bialek's child. He won by the way.

What the hell does anyones financial past have to do with being sexually assaulted?

Have to question why the OP would even post nonsense like this. If your mom/wife//sister was sexually assaulted, would it not matter if she hadn't payed her electricity bill on time?

These two topics aren't connected.

Let me try to get this straight.

If you're sexually assaulted, but have an iffy financial past, no one cares.

But as long as you're good with money, you can sexually assault four women, and be in the running to become president of the U.S.

Cool system.

Originally posted by beezzer
My question is, "why now"? Why do they accuse now?

If I committed a crime and sexually harassed someone, do they wait until I'm running for office to state it?

If he did commit these acts, then why wait?

I smell a rat!

Why now? Maybe because a sleaze-bag doesn't deserve/isn't a good fit to be president. I'm guessing if he was applying for a job at Wal-Mart maybe she would have continued ignoring his past.

like someone said before, funny how all of a sudden these come out as he is gaining popularity in the polls....

Herman Cain touched me too.

5th

Originally posted by beezzer
My question is, "why now"? Why do they accuse now?

If I committed a crime and sexually harassed someone, do they wait until I'm running for office to state it?

If he did commit these acts, then why wait?

I smell a rat! [/quot

She probably didn't think it was important to until now.

edit on November 8th 2011 by Daughter2 because: (no reason given)