Herman Cain's fourth accuser, Sharon Bialek, has a troubled financial past

www.examiner.com...

Sharon Bialek, Herman Cain's latest accuser of sexual misconduct, says she didn't step forward for money's sake, but it sounds like she could sure use some! Her past legal problems with money are reportedly overwhelming.

www.examiner.com...

reply to post by ChicagOpinion


Wtf does her financial issues have to do with her being harrassed? Maybe she was paid off to say it, or maybe - just maybe Hermy's a pervy. That ever cross anyones mind? Better yet, why is anyone even looking into her financial history? Do all victims have their financial history dug through and announced to the world?

Like you said she's not asking for money so why bring up her financial past? What does that have to do with Cain's alleged assault on her. Soon it will be that she was hitting him up for cash and when he rejected her she claimed he assaulted her.

My question is, "why now"? Why do they accuse now?

If I committed a crime and sexually harassed someone, do they wait until I'm running for office to state it?

If he did commit these acts, then why wait?

I smell a rat!

Originally posted by beezzer
My question is, "why now"? Why do they accuse now?

If I committed a crime and sexually harassed someone, do they wait until I'm running for office to state it?

If he did commit these acts, then why wait?

I smell a rat!

I don't think anyone is accusing now in the sense you're trying to say.

Politico reported on it because that's their job - like it or not.

Then Cain started saying there was nothing to it...or wait...there was something to it but it wasn't much....or wait....there was something to it and the settlements were more than I said but it was still baseless....or wait but I now forgot what I thought I remembered and I don't want to talk about it anymore. ROFLMAO......are you kidding me?

In the meantime, all the while his campaign keeps saying these are baseless allegations and the women are lying....each and every one of the women.

Women finally get fed up and call bull# on Cain for being a sleazy a-hole trying to take advantage of his position for his own sexual pleasure AND a liar.

That's why they are now coming out. It's not the crime - it's the cover-up.

He would have been far better off to say nothing or very little when this came out.

And no...I am not a liberal. Simply a human being with common sense, some reasoning abilities and a little sense of right & wrong.

Originally posted by ChicagOpinion
www.examiner.com...

Sharon Bialek, Herman Cain's latest accuser of sexual misconduct, says she didn't step forward for money's sake, but it sounds like she could sure use some! Her past legal problems with money are reportedly overwhelming.

www.examiner.com...

If the accusations prove to be correct, then it doesn't really matter why she stepped forward

Apparently "everyone" has financial problems!!!!! We are all in debt! There are loads of women comming forward and there is no smoke without fire, this guy is guilty IMO.

Ron Paul is Americas last hope and therefore the worlds last hope. The whole world must get behind Ron Paul, not just the Americans.

reply to post by beezzer


Because it's good for our democracy to know what sort of skeletons are hanging in the closets of our candidates?

Personally, I feel this may be an attempt to get Cain out of the campaign... by the Cain campaign. See, running for president can be very lucrative, especially if you're taking time out to pawn your book. But, and here's the thing, if you get the nomination, suddenly your finances become much more scrutinized, much more restricted. If you run as a hopeful, and then ditch, you get to keep your campaign contributions for "next time."

Cain's making a run with the money, since none of the crazy stuff he's done so far seems to convince voters to ditch him. "I'm the Koch Brothers' brother from another mother," are you kidding me? Unfortunately there's a major miscalculation - the sort of people who make up Cain's newfound "base" tend to be the sort of people who make excuses for rapists, much less sexual harassment (tip - it's always the woman's fault. She's always a lying, hysterical gold-digger who "really wanted it.")

So Cain, faced with his poll numbers not dropping, will either have to ignore the numbers and announce his resignation due to this scandal, or will have to come up with an even wackier scandal (my money is on him suddenly deciding to join Nation of Islam)

Anyone else think she looks like Stifflers mom?

I gotta agree with Beezer on this. The timing sure seems suspect.

reply to post by ChicagOpinion


I just love how the story spins to a Ms. Bialek's financial troubles. The STRAIGHT fact is Herman Cain used his position of leadership and sexually harrassed FOUR women!! The TRUE question, don't we have enough scumbags running our country already? Let's start voting their power-hungry asses out of office and keep the other scumbags from getting in!!

RON PAUL 2012!! If he's not on the ballot...WRITE IT IN!!!!

Originally posted by beezzer
My question is, "why now"? Why do they accuse now?

If I committed a crime and sexually harassed someone, do they wait until I'm running for office to state it?

If he did commit these acts, then why wait?

I smell a rat!

Funny how your reaction was so different when it came to Wiener...and in Wiener's case it was consentual

Hypocrite much?

reply to post by MrXYZ


Careful, he'll blithely accuse you of being partisan! And you don't want that, do you?

reply to post by ChicagOpinion


Yes, because only Democrats can sexually assault/harass women.

I say, suck it up Herman Cain. You're a shill for the Fed and your candidacy is going nowhere.

reply to post by beezzer


More specifically. Why wait until he's ahead in the polls?

Originally posted by The Sword
reply to post by ChicagOpinion

 

Yes, because only Democrats can sexually assault/harass women.

I say, suck it up Herman Cain. You're a shill for the Fed and your candidacy is going nowhere.

The fact that he claims to be the Koch brothers' "brother from another mother" should be reason enough to laugh at anyone voting for him

So that scandal doesn't really matter, it was clear before what a crook that guy is

reply to post by MrXYZ


Cain is just there as a foil to Ron Paul.

They knew that people were going to back Paul so they made sure to back Paul into a corner themselves using Cain.

The strategy of attacking someone who has come forward as an accuser has never sat well with me, and is used by the left every chance they get. I don't like seeing it here.

I don't see any relevance to this woman's financial history in this.

And for the record, I don't like Cain and I think he would be a freaking disaster as President. At least as bad as any of the pack of "Conservatives" (Current Conservative attitude: My freedoms count but yours don't) and worse than some.

But by this woman's own testimony he started groping her then stopped when she said to. And took her back to her hotel, apparently without further incident.

So barring his "You want a job, don't you?" question to her, he sounds more pathetic than harrassing... some total dork who tried to put "the moves" on somebody, got shot down and stopped. Even that question... which I reckon was probably asked in a whine can be seen as part of "the move".

As mentioned, Cain in my book is as bad as all of the current crop of "conservatives" and not anybody that will ever get my vote, but to me, based on this evidence, he is more a pathetic loser than a big-time intimidating harrasser.

He may well be a sexual predator, but so far the evidence for it is somewhat weak.

reply to post by jjkenobi


Hello? Are you are awake?

It's been used by REPUBLICANS for decades now! Don't you remember Monicagate? The fall of John Edwards, Anthony Weiner and Eliot Spitzer?

Here's a hint for you: They're all Democrats.

Don't go off on a tangent and cry that "the left" uses these tactics all the time. That's a total crock of bull#.

Deny Ignorance.

Originally posted by MrXYZ

Originally posted by beezzer
My question is, "why now"? Why do they accuse now?

If I committed a crime and sexually harassed someone, do they wait until I'm running for office to state it?

If he did commit these acts, then why wait?

I smell a rat!

Funny how your reaction was so different when it came to Wiener...and in Wiener's case it was consentual

Hypocrite much?

Weiner was caught lying. Basically he was caught with his pants down -bwahahahahaha- ahem, Cain hasn't.

Grasping at straws much?