It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Britguy
So, no assistance for hard up taxpayers to heat their homes in the harsh weather, but they'll gladly spend $20+ Billion just on air conditioning in Iraq and Afghanistan. What's wrong with this picture?
Originally posted by antar
The thing that gripes me is that for a struggling family with children, they can allow them to lose electricity/gas and then take the children away because of the unsafe environment and lack of care, but will not help the truly needy to keep their lights on in the first place saving millions a year on foster care and red tape bureaucracy.
Originally posted by illuminatislave
Originally posted by Adamanteus
I cannot really comment on this issue with any experience since I live in florida and the temperature doesn't go down into the negative 0 temperatures.
Although I do remember having to put the entire family in a single room with a space heater to stay warm as a child during some winters. I advocate helping those in dire needs to keep them from perishing due to the cold, but I do not advocate subsidizing people that want to keep their home at a balmy 72 degrees all winter.
I know that they say only death and taxes are a sure thing but I'm pretty sure(in my lifetime at least) that it's going to get cold in the winter and people know this and fail to prepare themselves for it.edit on 8-11-2011 by Adamanteus because: (no reason given)
You live in Florida.
It has nothing to do with keeping your home a "balmy" 72 degrees. This is utterly ignorant.
Come live for a winter in New Jersey or New York, where energy prices are sky high, and try to survive with no heat from November to late March.
All of that tough talk would go right out of the window.
I see a lot of big talk from people who couldn't walk a mile in the shoes of others.
Originally posted by supine
Originally posted by OptimusSubprime
Call me a cold hearted bastard if you want (and if you do I don't care), but I manage to pay my own bills (somehow) and so should everyone else.
You got my vote. Only thing is, how could one call you cold hearted when you manage to keep your heat on?
Now if each individual state wants to have their own program in place for this purpose then that is their right, but this should not be a federal program.
And the money going into the states for these types of programs comes from the Federal Government anyway, so what's your point?
Originally posted by joyride0187
Why is more money not put into preventing breeding amongst the incapable?
Originally posted by supine
Originally posted by joyride0187
Why is more money not put into preventing breeding amongst the incapable?
Some of the "incapable," you speak of are elderly people.
People who worked their entire lives that now live on limited fixed incomes. The may have saved their entire lives for their golden years, never expecting that heating a home would be so out of reach for them.
Don't you ever read the news to see how many elderly people die in the summertime from the heat, or the cold in the winter?
I'm sure that "breeding," is the last thing on the mind of an 80 something year old!
Just wait, with any luck you might get there some day!
Originally posted by joyride0187
The elderly arent the problem. They are the ones who actually need the help. My problem is with those who have 5 children and expect everything to be handed to them.
Why is more money not put into preventing breeding amongst the incapable?
Despite record-breaking profits in 2005, all the major U.S. oil corporations reportedly refused to participate in similar programs.
"We are committed to working for a hemisphere with less poverty and more development, whether by teaching 1.5 million adults to read in Venezuela or helping Massachusetts residents through a long winter." And he puts his money where his mouth is. Ya gotta love it.
It's a conspiracy to make Big Oil and the Bush administration look bad.
Originally posted by jaynkeel
Glad I spent the $$ a few years back and installed a wood burner in my home. Whenever possible when out and about we try to collect any wood laying around thats burnable and then buy in the summer for the winter when cash allows. Only problem for me nowdays is that I recently had back surgery and can no longer split and process wood, which when you have a nice big pile that needs it is aggravating to say the least. And as a side note when fired up my house stays a nice even 74* even on the cold winter days in Buffalo area of NYS. I wouldn't even be able to imagine how much gas that would require with a conventional furnace, which we do occasionally run as I am anal when it comes to keeping the chimney and fireplace clean ( every other week). And I have heard of some people living on a fixed income, well mine is broke!!!