It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Seventhdoor
Originally posted by Radekus
reply to post by Seventhdoor
Humans are too short lived a species to harness enough experience
so as to eliminate all personal suffering.
Keep in mind, with no needs, there are no goals, without goals,
stagnation, and guess what follows, anomie.
Needs are both our destroyer and our creator.
It is what propels deviant behavior as well as ingenuity.
A thing to think about.
Not true. Many people have eliminated personal suffering within their lives, many have done it by middle age. Buddha did this, and he was 35.
You are confusing needs, goals, and having desires with attachment to them. You can have all these things without attachment.
Needs are what you can't go without unless you want your body to die. But you can feed your body food without attachment to food. You can give your body shelter without attachment to having a home. You can give your body water without attachment to drinking.
Attachment is clinging, if you cling then you have no home, suddenly your life is miserable. If you are unattached you won't care, you'll just do whatever you need to do to find shelter or rebuild your life, and you'll do it joyously even.
Goals and desires can also exist without clinging. One can have sex for example without attachment. One simply does it then lets it be. One does not suffer without sex, or feel unfulfilled if they don't orgasm every day. It doesn't bother them, they have achieved non attachment to the idea of having sex.
If you don't have that non attachment, then sex becomes important. Suddenly you feel you have to have it. You seek it from anyone. You sleep with people you don't care about. You masturbate daily seeking to fulfill this desire. But it can't be fulfilled, because the moment its complete its gone, then its only a matter of time before it arises again. So one learns to live non attached, and then one is free from the suffering of not having sex.
This is just one example. Such a person will still be fully capable of having the desire to have sex, of feeling attraction, and of having sex, yet if they go a year without it, its no big deal.
Simply put, suffering results from holding onto something that will die. Its the idea that we own an object which is perishable, when ownership would really mean we have complete control over it. We don't your computer will die someday. Its the idea that a loved one will ALWAYS be here, thats a delusion and leads to suffering. Recognizing this as the case, we cherish the time we have with them and let them go when its time for them to go. Otherwise we end up a mess.edit on 2011/11/6 by Seventhdoor because: words
Originally posted by Seventhdoor
Desires themselves do not cause suffering.
The cause of suffering is attachment. The cause of attachment is desire or clinging. The cause of desire or clinging is ignorance.
Therefore suffering results from ignorance. Ignorance produces attachment or clinging to various impermanent things (such as desires) and when these things come to an end, we experience loss and therefore suffer. To eliminate ignorance one must contemplate the true nature of things without clinging to any view about them.
Originally posted by Seventhdoor
Originally posted by Radekus
reply to post by Seventhdoor
Humans are too short lived a species to harness enough experience
so as to eliminate all personal suffering.
Keep in mind, with no needs, there are no goals, without goals,
stagnation, and guess what follows, anomie.
Needs are both our destroyer and our creator.
It is what propels deviant behavior as well as ingenuity.
A thing to think about.
Not true. Many people have eliminated personal suffering within their lives, many have done it by middle age. Buddha did this, and he was 35.
You are confusing needs, goals, and having desires with attachment to them. You can have all these things without attachment.
Needs are what you can't go without unless you want your body to die. But you can feed your body food without attachment to food. You can give your body shelter without attachment to having a home. You can give your body water without attachment to drinking.
Attachment is clinging, if you cling then you have no home, suddenly your life is miserable. If you are unattached you won't care, you'll just do whatever you need to do to find shelter or rebuild your life, and you'll do it joyously even.
Goals and desires can also exist without clinging. One can have sex for example without attachment. One simply does it then lets it be. One does not suffer without sex, or feel unfulfilled if they don't orgasm every day. It doesn't bother them, they have achieved non attachment to the idea of having sex.
If you don't have that non attachment, then sex becomes important. Suddenly you feel you have to have it. You seek it from anyone. You sleep with people you don't care about. You masturbate daily seeking to fulfill this desire. But it can't be fulfilled, because the moment its complete its gone, then its only a matter of time before it arises again. So one learns to live non attached, and then one is free from the suffering of not having sex.
This is just one example. Such a person will still be fully capable of having the desire to have sex, of feeling attraction, and of having sex, yet if they go a year without it, its no big deal.
Simply put, suffering results from holding onto something that will die. Its the idea that we own an object which is perishable, when ownership would really mean we have complete control over it. We don't your computer will die someday. Its the idea that a loved one will ALWAYS be here, thats a delusion and leads to suffering. Recognizing this as the case, we cherish the time we have with them and let them go when its time for them to go. Otherwise we end up a mess.edit on 2011/11/6 by Seventhdoor because: words