It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Impact Warning Theory

page: 18
194
<< 15  16  17    19  20  21 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 7 2011 @ 04:56 PM
link   




"16th and 17th Century European history"
Based on my knowledge of human psychology, this is a technique display some irrelevant knowledge to intimidate and make you question your own ability.. to crush descent..
edit on 7-11-2011 by mockrock because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 7 2011 @ 05:07 PM
link   
reply to post by woogleuk
 


OK, thanks. There are a lot of unknowns, as yet.....more will be revealed as it gets close. There are several radar telescopes tracking since the 6th November (lost the source for that, read it and closed the Web page).

Yeah, a boat is large, but has a lot of empty space, so masses less than a solid hunk of rock. What is not known, though, is the type of rock this asteroid is made of.

Here's a calculator, and has four default settings for density parameters:

1,000 kg/m^3 for ice
1,500 kg/m^3 for porous rock
3,000 kg/m^3 for dense rock
8,000 kg/m^3 for iron

impact.ese.ic.ac.uk...

I read that its relative velocity is 13 km/sec....the above calculator suggests round about 17 km/sec as typical for asteroids, so in the ballpark.

So...at 400 meters diameter (200 radius) I get roughly (rounded up and down) about 33 to 34 million cubic meters as a result for total volume, presuming it is spherical. (If elongated, that number can vary greatly).

So, mass matters....and matter has mass....(
)....but many variables are still open to conjecture, including how much it would break apart on entry (hypothetical, now...since this one won't hit Earth this time 'round).

Et Cetera........



posted on Nov, 7 2011 @ 05:11 PM
link   
I think at the end of this we need a Globally funded body to monitor NEO's we are attempting global cooperation on climate change so why not this? Surely from past events this is sensible..



posted on Nov, 7 2011 @ 05:11 PM
link   
I do think you put alot of work into this. But 98% of things said here never transpire. And I'm sure we all hope this don't. God Bless everyone. The thing I like about this site and this topic is people looking out for each other which we don't do enough of in the real world. peace out........



posted on Nov, 7 2011 @ 05:14 PM
link   

Originally posted by mockrock
I think at the end of this we need a Globally funded body to monitor NEO's we are attempting global cooperation on climate change so why not this? Surely from past events this is sensible..


ahh there is a "body" to monitor NEO's it's called NASA and JPL and they say were fine and there is not going to be an impact from YU55 on November 8th, 9th or 10th ahh what the use.



posted on Nov, 7 2011 @ 05:17 PM
link   

Originally posted by joecool7734
I do think you put alot of work into this. But 98% of things said here never transpire. And I'm sure we all hope this don't. God Bless everyone. The thing I like about this site and this topic is people looking out for each other which we don't do enough of in the real world. peace out........


I think you are right.. people are labelled 'fear mongers' but the intention is never such.. it is just genuine concern. We are all anonymous on here.. I think we need to look at our governments who have eroded our faith.. false wars etc.. it would be nice for people to able to just trust what we are told.. but historically this has faith has been misplaced.



posted on Nov, 7 2011 @ 05:18 PM
link   

Originally posted by mileslong54

Originally posted by mockrock
I think at the end of this we need a Globally funded body to monitor NEO's we are attempting global cooperation on climate change so why not this? Surely from past events this is sensible..


ahh there is a "body" to monitor NEO's it's called NASA and JPL and they say were fine and there is not going to be an impact from YU55 on November 8th, 9th or 10th ahh what the use.


He said "globally funded." Hence, he'd like the NWO equivalent of NASA.

This week cannot pass fast enough.



posted on Nov, 7 2011 @ 05:18 PM
link   

Originally posted by mileslong54

Originally posted by mockrock
I think at the end of this we need a Globally funded body to monitor NEO's we are attempting global cooperation on climate change so why not this? Surely from past events this is sensible..


ahh there is a "body" to monitor NEO's it's called NASA and JPL and they say were fine and there is not going to be an impact from YU55 on November 8th, 9th or 10th ahh what the use.


But that is NASA basically set-up by the NAZI Von Braun.. I wonder if his ideology slipped in..



posted on Nov, 7 2011 @ 05:21 PM
link   
reply to post by mockrock
 


Yes some things should be central.. That is not a NWO.. A New World Order that we are about to see, relies upon exterminating the old world order..

I say, yes to a global world order.. but not one imposed on a false time frame.. But one that occurs naturally over time.. with consent.



posted on Nov, 7 2011 @ 05:27 PM
link   
reply to post by mockrock
 


There would be no need to impose a NWO if it truly had the benefit of all human kind at it's center principal..Because we would all move towards it naturally..

I am optimistic about humankind but a clique intends to shape the future in their own image..
edit on 7-11-2011 by mockrock because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 7 2011 @ 05:29 PM
link   
reply to post by mockrock
 


I invite any debunker to address the NAZI influence in NASA..



posted on Nov, 7 2011 @ 05:30 PM
link   
reply to post by randomname
 


Apparently, the heads of many nations including Obama are in Hawaii for a conference. Saw in the San Fran Chronicle....don't know how it could be verified.

edit on 7-11-2011 by timetothink because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 7 2011 @ 05:30 PM
link   
reply to post by SatoriTheory
 


Totally fascinating. What a great and scary read. Well done. Good luck to all of us if this comes to be. We will know soon enough.



posted on Nov, 7 2011 @ 05:36 PM
link   

edit on 7-11-2011 by Chai_An because: Nevermind



posted on Nov, 7 2011 @ 05:49 PM
link   
reply to post by mockrock
 



I invite any debunker to address the NAZI influence in NASA..



Hey everyone just ignore this person, they do this just to stop us actually talking about the post.. same technique every-time...


www.abovetopsecret.com...


Lets stop doing this.. This is what the pro debunkers do.. create conflict so we stop discussing the O.P


www.abovetopsecret.com...



posted on Nov, 7 2011 @ 05:54 PM
link   
reply to post by ProudBird
 


Yeah, I did some calculations based on available information in an earlier post (here) for all the "OMG! OMG! ELE! ELE!" crowd, just to calm some nerves, lol.

In a way, it's a shame it is just going to fly by. I would have liked to have seen it strike the facing side of the moon, especially on the outer visible edge.....what an impressive sight it might have been, especially through my scope, not to mention the valuable information it would have given us about impacts.
edit on 7/11/11 by woogleuk because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 7 2011 @ 05:56 PM
link   
reply to post by DJW001
 


But you ask us to trust a NAZI organisation.. that is not antagonistic but fact.. and since we are all sticking to facts.. why should we trust NAZI* sorry NASA
edit on 7-11-2011 by mockrock because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 7 2011 @ 06:09 PM
link   
Latest images of yu55 on NASA website. Pretty rubbish images as its so close. Look like it isnt going to hit us though. Will be glad when this week is over. Theres too much going on my head hurts

www.nasa.gov...



posted on Nov, 7 2011 @ 06:11 PM
link   
reply to post by Logman
 


Also, you once told me that you too had this gut feeling, only you now ignore it. That is entirely your choice and, up until now, I wasn't going to bash your convictions, but now I will.

Why do you choose to ignore it? Is it because it has you so confused that you'd rather ignore it, or is it because you're too frustrated with all these non-events to keep generating the energy to investigate each inkling you get?
Or are you too worried there will come a day where you cannot differ between paranoid delusion and intuition? Or are you just happy to ignore your intuition because it is convenient?

I don't ignore my basic warning systems. It's saved me in fights, in everyday situations and in life in general. It helps me discern what my eyes have seen but do not reveal. It helps me decipher what my ears have heard yet my 'common-sense' tells me can't be possible, yet it ends up being. You know 9/11, Libya, JFK Assassination and all the other things that we know are really happening but common-sense tells us otherwise.

Not listening to my intuition is ignorance. Reading, absorbing and discerning a 'theory' is not.

I'm sorry you've chosen to ignore yours.


edit on 7-11-2011 by LightAssassin because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 7 2011 @ 06:13 PM
link   
reply to post by timetothink
 



Apparently, the heads of many nations including Obama are in Hawaii for a conference.


Only the heads?








top topics



 
194
<< 15  16  17    19  20  21 >>

log in

join