It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
She added, "Occupy Oakland has a policy that has been passed through the General Assembly that we do not negotiate with politicians and we do not involve political parties."
"If individuals called the mayor's office they do not represent Occupy Oakland."
But how can any change com about if they won't negotiate with politicians? And the mayor??? Come on. I mean i am for actively participating in these reform movements but seriously? What does Oakland hope to accomplish if they do not negotiate with their politicians? That's where the changes hit big.
Things got testy, however, when another member of the media committee, Shake Anderson, said participants in the encampment outside City Hall had called the mayor's office early Thursday to disavow the people who were causing damage.
Heller interrupted him, saying that Occupy Oakland had not cooperated with the mayor. "If individuals called the mayor's office they do not represent Occupy Oakland."
She added, "Occupy Oakland has a policy that has been passed through the General Assembly that we do not negotiate with politicians and we do not involve political parties."
Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
But how can any change com about if they won't negotiate with politicians? And the mayor??? Come on. I mean i am for actively participating in these reform movements but seriously? What does Oakland hope to accomplish if they do not negotiate with their politicians? That's where the changes hit big.
I'm afraid the answer to that isn't one the OWS leadership cadre really want talked about much right now. The solution is simple, though. It isn't to change the system from within or even from influence brought to bear from the outside. Listen to their own words coming right out of General Assembly and statements out of Leadership members. The solution is to BRING DOWN the system entirely....not fix it.
This would be why they are losing some of their more intelligent and promising people who could really bring things to assist with a protest. People such as myself and others who want to protest...don't fit it well with a revolution...and that seems to be the mindset and ideal of some big camp locations...like Oakland, based on those statements.
More power to them.....I guess....I just ask they stop talking as if 99% of the United States population is for their brand of revolt. That's absurd. We aren't...and 99% are likely to fight back if the public face of OWS these days are also those who actually fantasize having real power in this new world they seem to want. No way..No way in hell.
Originally posted by TheImmaculateD1
This adheres fully to the following :
All are welcomed from all faiths, ethnic groups, political persuasions, LBGTI, animal and kid friendly as we will not discriminate, we will be friendly to all. Illicit narcotics (marijuana to meth while all scrips prescribed to a fellow protester are obviously allowed) and liquor (all forms) use are banned and will get someone expelled and turned over to law enforcement. Come as you are! Remember, there is no member of the 1% that is on this website which means we are all The 99%!
Originally posted by pngxp
Originally posted by TheImmaculateD1
This adheres fully to the following :
All are welcomed from all faiths, ethnic groups, political persuasions, LBGTI, animal and kid friendly as we will not discriminate, we will be friendly to all. Illicit narcotics (marijuana to meth while all scrips prescribed to a fellow protester are obviously allowed) and liquor (all forms) use are banned and will get someone expelled and turned over to law enforcement. Come as you are! Remember, there is no member of the 1% that is on this website which means we are all The 99%!
that is the most disingenuous statement ever i think.
unless by friendly you mean drunk and rapey?
Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
reply to post by Gab1159
I certainly don't oppose the power of the people and I certainly wish Occupy had worked out. It doesn't seem to be, and would appear to be destined for a bad end the way things have begun changing.
Having said that...I'll point to one example of why OWS has become something of a joke. It's a dangerous one...but not to the 1%. The communities around the camps seem to have more to fear than any Politicians or Financial executives. The example that comes to mind is Israel. Over simple cost of living issues...they managed to hit the street with 400,000 people! Why? The rent is apparently too high.
OWS started as a great movement with good, energetic people fighting something much more serious than basic cost of living issues. Arguably, I'm going to say the United States is also feeling a higher level is general rage and dissatisfaction with it's leaders and overall system. Over 40 MILLION on food stamps represents several TIMES the total population of Israel as a nation....yet 400,000 vs....?
Lets see.... Oakland just about blew gaskets with happiness that 20,000 showed up...WITH the city letting people off work for it AND the Unions backing it to the hilt. 20,000 vs. 400,000?
St Louis, where I was, was thrilled to death with a couple thousand..again, that took a day with Union manpower coming in and a major effort had by all. Average on-site numbers were at 50 or so at night to a couple hundred at the height of a normal days activity.....vs Well, you get the idea.
We won't even get into London, Greece, Egypt or Tunisia. Our numbers from almost day 1 have been pathetic and embarrassing. They do NOT reflect a public in support and with sympathy. Not even remotely close. I wish it were different.....but there it is.
If one actually DID drop the chronically homeless, criminals and fugitives so only true and dedicated protesters remained....well... Hell, the numbers wouldn't even warrant news coverage. Here is hoping change can come another way because this wasn't it.
Originally posted by MrXYZ
reply to post by Wrabbit2000
The latest Gallup poll show they already have more support than the tea party...so not sure what you're talking about