Finally a Respectable plea for Disclosure. WSJ calls for Govt to disclose what it knows...

Originally posted by sheepslayer247
reply to post by zorgon

 

"Plasma critters"? I have never heard of such a theory. Can you share a link or the "document"?

By the way, isn't Jim Oberg just a paid government naysayer?

No, he's not. You are a moron to think so, and a malevolent jerk to make that false accusation in public.

And in this litigious culture, you are a DOUBLE moron to make it in print.

reply to post by JimOberg


Sorry, 'mate' you have publicly been considered a fraud, no second chances.

Originally posted by Imtor
reply to post by JimOberg

 

Sorry, 'mate' you have publicly been considered a fraud, no second chances.

Imtor, I acknowledge my views and my original research results on classic, holy cases are mighty dangerous to the dogmas and self-delusions of true believers. The best defense against them is to boogeyman their source to scare off the novices from being more fully informed about stuff that feels so good to believe in.

You have some stake and firewood ready for me somewhere? A dart board with my face on the target?

How mature and super-smart and warm-fuzzy does that make you feel?

reply to post by JimOberg

All right then. You go Jim.

PS I am honored that you visited my thread.

Originally posted by Imtor
reply to post by JimOberg

 

Sorry, 'mate' you have publicly been considered a fraud, no second chances.

To be considered a fraud or government "disinformation" agent in this field, you simply have to disagree with someone's strongly held views.

See the thread at the link below to see a parody of this tendency within Ufology (and the view expressed in the conclusion to that item, i.e. "If a UFO researcher fails to agree with your views, it is probably because he is a Disinformation Agent"):
Top 100 Real "Men in Black"

reply to post by Toxicsurf


Ok I get what you're saying.
Still what ever raises awareness is useful. Even if its one citizen at a time. One will tell their friends and they will tell their friends.
What we need is an effort that will take the ridicule out of this and make it a subject for more serious discussion.
The UFO discussion today is not what it was even 20 years ago. I think that we are moving in the right direction and this small effort will make a difference even if it is a baby step.

reply to post by DieBravely


And lets be honest here. What we are talking about is not govt craft. We are talking real live off world lifeforms and the craft they are piloting within our airspace. At least for this thread anyway.

reply to post by JimOberg


You were being tested, but no I dont share your views.

reply to post by Imtor


Tested? For what ? What constitutes a passing grade?

This is our Jim


en.wikipedia.org...