It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by moonweird
Ok thanks. People who read this thread can decide for themselves I guess. But I suggest everyone trust their own eyes and brain, than the encyclopedia. I mean, that's how the encyclopedia got so thick right? haha.
I just wanted to support the other side a little, because every thread is inundated by paid posters.
Again, there are smart people with a brain here, who stand their ground based on their personal experience.
Some call them crazy, I call them "people who have day jobs".
Originally posted by moonweird
But I suggest everyone trust their own eyes and brain, than the encyclopedia.
I just wanted to support the other side a little, because every thread is inundated by paid posters.
Again, there are smart people with a brain here, who stand their ground based on their personal experience.
......because every thread is inundated by paid posters.
Originally posted by LeoVirgo
so explain to us why the moon should not look this way right now....explain to us how it should look due to the orientation to where the sun is to the moon...
Originally posted by Uncinus
(moon show 32x normal size)
Originally posted by ANOK
Originally posted by Illustronic
I think the major thing the internet has taught me is how stupid some people are lol. This thread is hilarious.
Even if the moon did turn upside down, it wouldn't change the way the sun lights it up. It would still look exactly the same. It's a sphere with light shining on it from one direction. The sun would have to be in the opposite plane, not the moon.
edit on 11/4/2011 by ANOK because: typo
edit on 21-11-2011 by Anon1151605 because: I accidently had my sentence "Also, I've been reading ATS for a couple months now and I'm hooked. This is my first post." Look like it was being quoted by his post
Originally posted by luxordelphi
The Cheshire moon is always a startling sight unless, of course, you're on the equator.
or the moon is actually a projected holographic image
Originally posted by CherubBaby
What I am saying is that the moon is displaying a characteristic at the 36th parallel that is only supposed to happen on the equator and 17 degrees above or below it. I am also saying since this is true then something must be perturbing the moons orbit or ours. Also I admit I am not 500 years old. My point in saying that is simple. Do you really have faith or confidence in trying to know what may be happening in this time we live in. Lets face it you , me we, are what 20 - 60 years in age approx? Do you think that 20 -60 years of age has any concept of the universe or the changes it may be going through? Get a grip. We are less that a grain of sand on a beach compared to the time and the changes that are to come and have taken place in this venue. I would suggest humbling ourselves. I don't want to argue anyone into my beliefs or speculations. But, my arguement is just as valid as anyones under the circumstances with the data available.edit on 4-11-2011 by CherubBaby because: typo
Originally posted by CherubBaby
reply to post by Unity_99
A visual effect? I would say an equatorial moon is a good visual on the 36 north lat. Plus it's not always easy to see visually when there is so much junk in the air , so often above in the sky..
Originally posted by CherubBaby
reply to post by Soylent Green Is People
I have a simple answer for you. "At THIS Point, I don't trust anything but someones eye witness account with a pic and references.
Originally posted by luxordelphi
reply to post by Uncinus
It's not necessary to use Stellarium when the moon is right outside. I just go look at it. Why would you need a graphic to show you the moon when it's hard to miss in the sky? The Cheshire moon is always a startling sight unless, of course, you're on the equator.