It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by jhn7537
I'm in Chicago... I feel like its fair to think that something bad could happen on US soil, and if we attack Iran, maybe they wont go toe to toe with us with their military, but they could try the tactic of a "terrorist-like" attack on US soil, and thats what worries me, especially knowing that i live in a major city.....
Originally posted by Logical one
Originally posted by princeofpeace
The only difference is that the strikes on Iraq (and on Syria's reactor a few years ago) were that they struck one target. What would be done to Iran would look like all out bombardment because Israel would have to hit many targets thorughout the country as Iran's program is dispersed in more than a few locations. Combine that with also having to eliminate defense posts around those sites and we're talking about an air campaign that would look like all out war. Not just a single surgical strike on a reactor.
Depends what you mean by "all out war".
The Israeli's supplied by the US, have superior weaponary that would only suffer minimal millitarily insignificant casualties.
Iran remember fought Saddam's Iraq for 8 years.........and Iraq's defenses crumbled in a matter of weeks.
If Israel do go it alone........which I suspect is the most likely outcome.........I suspect a surgical strike by the Israelis.
Iran of course will complain bitterly to the US and the UN.......but protests will fall on deaf ears........Iran's nuclear program will be put back somewhat...........but probably will get rebuilt further down the line.
edit on 3-11-2011 by Logical one because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by navy_vet_stg3
Why would a Brit be calling for the USA to be nuked anyway
Originally posted by navy_vet_stg3
, unless you're a middle-eastern descendant who hates the "west" to begin with?
Originally posted by navy_vet_stg3
If I had my way, I'd be completely happy with Iran, or any other nation being peaceful and we all live and let live. Perhaps Ahmadinejad would be happy to stop threatening to wipe countries off the map. With a LEADER saying things like that, it's only natural to be a bit paranoid of their activities.
Originally posted by navy_vet_stg3
With a LEADER saying things like that, it's only natural to be a bit paranoid of their activities.
Originally posted by Logical one
Originally posted by jhn7537
Well if there was a US stike on Iran's nuclear facilities, bases, etc... Do you think that Iran would just do nothing or retaliate?
Iran is not China or Russia.............it doesn't have the millitary capability to "retaliate".........the only thing it could do perhaps is launch a few crude missiles over Saudi Arabia or Israel.
Iran knows that this would only draw more missiles down on them.........so they probably would be limited to terrorist threats.
Originally posted by Raider of Truth
China and Russia will not let this happen they have invested to much time and money in Iran's military and nuclear infrastructure. Netanyahu and his zionist puppets don't realise what the consequences of this would mean globally.
Iran in no way has shown any military aggression to the west except for some typical political diatribe usually aimed at the USA and Israel in particular to make himself look popular with his people as all leaders do. They have the right to peaceful nuclear technology and space technology. As usual Israel being the bullies of the middle east. I actually hope they get annihilated by the arabs because they have been asking for it for the past 40+ years.
If this goes ahead(absolutely bat# insane if it does considering the mess we are already in with the economy and middle east) i will be embarassed and ashamed to be British quite frankly