Judge William Adams beats daughter for using the Internet

reply to post by Pocky


A psyop to bring in laws that prevent people from hitting children??? THOSE MONSTERS!!!!

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/1f4e9ee9a17a.jpg[/atsimg]

reply to post by MrXYZ


No, more like Psyops to bring Big Brother into your house. Make you afraid of your own kid getting you in trouble for life.

It's like this show I saw many years ago, where a social worker convinced a small child to incriminate her parents into child abuse and it landed one of the parents in jail for a long time for something he did not do.

I got my bum whooped over the normal age so I'm not at all a fan of this. I used to think that if I could, i would push for a law where they don't allow the parents to spank their kids, but that was back then, before the details of these NWO plans came to full light.



www.bibliotecapleyades.net...

The ultimate goal of all of this is to create an organized army of children, youth, and adults, who will know exactly what to do during the coming takeover of the world. The training that I described is going on not only in the U.S., but in every country in the world. Top training centers are located in Germany, Belgium, France, and Russia. Military trainers are often sent to these countries, to learn new techniques, then sent back to their home countries.

Originally posted by Pocky
reply to post by MrXYZ

 

No, more like Psyops to bring Big Brother into your house. Make you afraid of your own kid getting you in trouble for life.

It's like this show I saw many years ago, where a social worker convinced a small child to incriminate her parents into child abuse and it landed one of the parents in jail for a long time for something he did not do.

I got my arse whooped over the normal age so I'm not at all a fan of this. I used to think that if I could, i would push for a law where they don't allow the parents to spank their kids, but that was back then, before the details of these NWO plans came to full light.

And what exactly is your opinion on the many scenarios like you described where the parents don't get sent away? And the children are deemed liars due to inconsistencies in the stories...?

Like " merciful euthanasia", to a public that is unaware of the Illuminati, It will not conceive that it could be used against them.

People who do not know about the tptb think Obama Healthcare is so sweet... but those who do know are aware that it's gonna be used against them.

Iluminati do it or their benefit.. not yours.

There's a part of me that looks at this thread and sees how good it is for people to be defending the girl in the video so vehemently, but there's another part of me wondering where this energy is at when it comes to all these illegal wars and banker rip-offs happening constantly. A cute girl gets beaten by her father seven years ago and everybody is outraged to the point where there are threats of murder, yet the billionaire bankers who have destroyed our children's future with their avarice get endless recourse from the government while the general public supports it? Sure, there are the OWS protests, but I'm already seeing the media infiltration of it in the same manner that happened to the Tea Party movement.

reply to post by SonicInfinity


Dear SonicInfinity

Too burn these two adults at the stake is far too easy a way out for them.

Knowing that this man is in a position of power, if I where an American I could do nothing but hang my head in shame.

When that kid gets h0old of a gun and blows both there heads off it will be justifiable homicide.

reply to post by SonicInfinity


what's this thread about?

people are emotionally involved in this now because it's a brand new story - it's extremely disturbing on an almost personal level it hasn't been going on for 8 years...

the wars have outraged plenty of people - not sure how you've missed it

OWS is a huge story - it's everywhere - and people are pretty involved in that one too

now I'm confused - are you derailing your own thread?

Originally posted by muzzleflash

Originally posted by bhornbuckle75
reply to post by muzzleflash

 

Dear God dude....I'm sure someone else has already commented to this effect, but if you think it's no ones business if someone beats their child, then do you also think it's no ones business if a husband beats their wife? If you honestly feel there's a difference, then I feel terrible pity for you.

I have pointed it out already also, that there is a difference between adults and a child.

I as an adult, do not have Responsibility to raise other adults.

However, children are not free to make their own irrational decisions. The parent is Responsible for that child and must ensure that they are raised properly to avoid causing themselves trouble or causing trouble for others.

Why people continue with these false-comparisons is beyond me.

edit on 3-11-2011 by muzzleflash because: (no reason given)

Again I must ask...'Seriously?!? We're not talking about the responsibility of raising a child into an adult...we're talking about BEATING a child. Not to mention the very act of beating a child is sort of a a whole 'default' on the whole being a responsible adult part by the parents. Are you honestly not understanding the concept that beating someone is wrong, whether it's a child or an adult? Like I said before. I can only have an enormous amount of pity for you. I can't imagine the kind of life you must have led that you would defend beating a child under any circumstance as being 'no ones business'. I'm not trying to argue with you friend. The concepts here are so self evident and obvious that most people understand this immediately. The fact that you don't is honestly incredibly sad.

Originally posted by Tindalos2013

Originally posted by bhornbuckle75
reply to post by muzzleflash

 

Dear God dude....I'm sure someone else has already commented to this effect, but if you think it's no ones business if someone beats their child, then do you also think it's no ones business if a husband beats their wife? If you honestly feel there's a difference, then I feel terrible pity for you.

One night I was walking along the street and I heard alot of shouting and screaming coming from inside a nearby house. I stopped and listened for a while. A mans voice was bellowing and shouting loudly at a woman who was screaming in fear. I heard things being smashed and thrown about violently. The woman was crying and pleading for him to stop hitting her etc etc. I just lit a cigarette and walked on by because I dont care to involve myself in and about such things.

Good for you then, buddy....I hope you don't mind if someone ignores your plea's for help, if a bunch of thugs are ever beating you to death with a tire iron. I mean...If it's up to you then they should just simply light a cigarette and move along...I know you wouldn't want someone to go out of their way for ya and make a call to the cops or anything ....I mean that would make you a hypocrite and all of that. In fact you'd best be safe and not even bother the cops with something like that yourself...after all why should they get involved either.

To conclude...Empathy for our fellow humans is what most of us would define as the very thing that makes us 'human'. Without empathy, life is empty, shallow, and pitiable.....Good luck with all of that then!!

OK my opinion is the Mother gave the proper discipline but the Father was excessive in his verbal abuse and returning twice to strike her again...HE definitely has issues! I fully agree that despite his over enthusiastic strikes I can guarantee the girl suffered no lasting physical pain/ injury, especially as she had heavy sweats on!! It's too
obvious she's trying to frame her parents for abuse....cerebral palsy?? Really??? Just another spoiled American teen who feels they can justify and get away with anything! One thing that bugs me is why the computer is STILL in her room!?!! Wouldn't the removal of the "problem-making" device be YOUR first step??
And yes, I'm an American child of the '70's and yes, I was "spanked"...usually with a long willow branch we had to pick ourselves, but only till about 12...then Mom tried other methods as the beatings were obviously ineffective!
Taking away ALL my books actually worked...for awhile! lol

Anon will not stop the onslaught against JWA until he resigns from all of his positions and makes a public apology. I'm on board

reply to post by NadaCambia


Yeah I think I remember her saying that before on another site, and something about acting like a crab right before she pinches her kids. However I can't feature her husband tolerating that sort of thing. He's the most intelligent levelheaded person I've ever talked to. So trust me when I say this, if she really did that sort of thing he would simply call the cops, and she would be taking court ordered parenting classes.

One thing that has been interesting to me is how quickly this topic caught on fire. This thread roared to over 70 pages overnight, for example, and elewhere on the net similarly heated conversations are underway,

Of course, the issue itself bears consideration and debate. But I would submit to you that there is something else at work here. I think the arguments over politics and ideology have become so bitter and frustrating that people of all sorts welcome the chance to have a different kind of argument, one that draws lines in different ways. I think the frustration that people feel with society in general is reflected in its "shadowside" here...there may be almost a sense of relief, subconsciously, at being able to take a stand for something more concrete, less slippery and abstract. Perhaps to find common ground in indignation over this topic when there seems so little common ground over anything else. Search your heart...am I completely wrong?

reply to post by CREAM



~SheopleNation

heh , wel i deleted a post (an indepth intelligent one) on page one covering many aspects of this story.
but my main question is.....why do the 'spankers' have such an obsession with butts?
if your just an angry freak/bad parent and just want to hit something, i can understand(youre an idiot, but i can understand).
but enough with the butt, it just makes you look like a pervert.

reply to post by muzzleflash



No way. There should definitely be limits. I was spanked as a child and my dad did it within reason.
He picked an amount of spanks, made sure he was cool tempered when he administered them, was patient (not spanking when I would put my hands up, so he wouldn't break my hand or cause real damage), only used that kind of punishment through a certain age (when it actually works and teaches a kid something NOT 16!), and always used either a regular belt, hand, or paddle. Also I can say without doubt, if I had cerebral palsy or any problem he never would have laid a hand on me.. I was a hellion.

I think how he punished actually benefited me.
This guy is psychotic, thirsting to hurt his kid, not aiming and hitting her legs and hands when she is blocking, and not wanting to stop.

I think he is bordering on child abuse here. It is our business at this point (especially with the girl having cerebral palsy! That said, would you not agree with me? Do you agree that the corporal punishment my dad gave was a reasonable punishment and wouldn't be a bad set of regulations for spanking.

I would also like to note, that my dad's system definitely worked. I was a hyper, hellion, that broke things, bit people, and just caused all kinds of trouble. After years of his discipline, I try to be as polite as possible, reasonable, and nice. I don't cause anyone any problems or trouble, but am not subdued, afraid to express myself (as I show on this forums nightly), nor afraid in general. I appreciate my punishments. Here is an outline that I think worked on me for prospective people looking for a system.

GOGO VICMORROW'S Guide to Punishing Kids (based on my punishments - I don't have kids, but this is how I would do it - that's my disclaimer

)
Adjust ages as you please (within reason, all spankings should be on the butt only of course):
Baby to toddler - Take away possessions temporarily.
Toddler to around 5 - Very, very mild spanking, just the anger and fact you are spanking a child is enough to make the punishment work.
5 to around 10 - A decent spanking (but restrain yourself, you are an adult, but it can sting, it's ONLY on the butt so they can take a little pain).
10 to 14/15 - Grounding/banning from possessions/appliances OR as I was given standing in the corner (for a reasonable amount of time 30 min to an hour is enough. 2 if they did something really out of line) with threat of a spanking, should I not comply (This # WORKS). At this age they are becoming adults so a spanking is more humiliating than it is painful and no one should humiliate their kid EVER that causes real damage. What worked for my dad was making me stand, nose in the corner, while he watched T.V. or worked. He could keep an eye on me. If I tried to move, or leave he would threaten a good spanking. I was aware of how painful and humiliating that would be, so I stood. At this age, you need to let the kid feel like they have a little freedom to take responsibility and make their own choice, even if it is their own punishment. If they get to choose, they are more likely to comply, and wont hate you. So pick something, no: computer/t.v./phone/seeing girlfriend or friends (girlfriend/friend banning is a little harsh and they will hate you, well today they would actually probably freak out more for the video games, but maybe not if you have followed this guide ) and back it up with a spanking.

15/16 and 19 - They are teens. Most of their getting in trouble will likely be them testing their freedoms, or just regular old mistakes. You can't spank them, it would be humiliating and they would probably try to fight you and no matter how big they are or how much you want, you CAN'T fight a 19 year old. Take the car, phone, video games, anything YOU pay for really and back it up with the freedom to not let them be punished, but show sincere disappointment (If you have followed my outline up until that point I would almost guarantee that, unless you have a sociopath child, they will have enough respect to be punished or at least sincerely apologetic which is better.

20 and up - It's their mistake, show disappointment and let them make it. If it's something really big, and they want to fight you I would just stand down with the disappointment. If they hit you however, and depending on the situation (if it's emotional, death/end of relationship/etc, you can't fight them they need support over a lesson) hit them back, ha ha, they are adults and haven't learned a thing.

Originally posted by MAC269
reply to post by SonicInfinity

 

Dear SonicInfinity

Too burn these two adults at the stake is far too easy a way out for them.

Knowing that this man is in a position of power, if I where an American I could do nothing but hang my head in shame.

When that kid gets h0old of a gun and blows both there heads off it will be justifiable homicide.

You demonstate perfectly how you allow rage and anger to control your thoughts.

Originally posted by NadaCambia

The video doesn't say that he isn't guilty. But that they may not be able to charge him. 2 different things. He's still guilty and that's all that matters. He still broke the law. There's no dispute of that.

Please tell me what crime he is guilty of?
What law did he break?

reply to post by JohnySeagull


The father is guilty of assault.
The victim is a Child.
The crime relates to Child Abuse.

If you do not understand then please read through my earlier post.
I am prepared to keep communicating with you until you understand.

Much Peace...to all the Children who are abused everyday and who are all alone with their pain....

reply to post by Amanda5


What are you talking about? Understand what?

I know what the father did. I have eyes.

I was responding to another poster. I want to know what legally the father is guilty of.

You are talking about child abuse. In other posts I was just pointing out that the media has stated that the victim was 16 at the time this happend. Yet the law classes a child as 14 or younger.
So legally this would not be child abuse.

You then have to bring in if coporal punishment is permissable in this location. If it is then you have to decide what the definition of coporal punishment is.

Yes the incident is horrible but all I am asking is what exactly is he guilty of. I am guessing there will be no charges.

I was told by the poster i am replying to that : "I would also argue you have your head in Disney Land if you think he'll walk away from court without charges."


Before you answer questions to other posters you should read previous threads. Do you understand that?