It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by NadaCambia
No, you are still wrong. The only person who seemingly thinks the actions in the video are not significant is YOU.
In America or the UK his actions are illegal. You seem to think his actions aren't significant, that's a lack of humanity and intelligence on your part. He's committed a crime by the law you're quoting.
Originally posted by JohnySeagull
Its amazing watching the streaming reaction to this video on different sites.
Many people want the man killed.
Many more think he should be locked up for life.
People are just going insane with rage.
Do people consider this a life sentence crime?edit on 2-11-2011 by JohnySeagull because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by muzzleflash
Originally posted by NadaCambia
No, you are still wrong. The only person who seemingly thinks the actions in the video are not significant is YOU.
In America or the UK his actions are illegal. You seem to think his actions aren't significant, that's a lack of humanity and intelligence on your part. He's committed a crime by the law you're quoting.
Lame, I provide documents to actual laws supporting my case, providing definitions etc.
You say "Oh your wrong".
Can't argue with you, you are always right no matter what huh?
Proof doesn't even cause you to budge. Actual legal documents.
2004: Aransas County Court-At-Law Judge William Adams took a belt to his own teenage daughter as punishment for using the internet to acquire music and games that were unavailable for legal purchase at the time. She has had ataxic cerebral palsy from birth that led her to a passion for technology, which was strictly forbidden by her father's backwards views. The judge's wife was emotionally abused herself and was severely manipulated into assisting the beating and should not be blamed for any content in this video. The judge's wife has since left the marriage due to the abuse, which continues to this day, and has sincerely apologized and repented for her part and for allowing such a thing, long before this video was even revealed to exist. Judge William Adams is not fit to be anywhere near the law system if he can't even exercise fit judgement as a parent himself. Do not allow this man to ever be re-elected again. His "judgement" is a giant farce. Signed, Hillary Adams, his daughter
Originally posted by muzzleflash
Originally posted by OzTruth
Originally posted by muzzleflash
Originally posted by CALGARIAN
lmao.
All the people who said it was fine she is getting beating is CLEARLY men who:
1. Don't have a kid
2. Are single
3. Have a grudge against woman because of #2
I have a wife and two happy children.
My 7 yr old can do algebra, read a novel, and write proficiently.
I would have to say you are entirely bias and presumptive.
This is a old school witch hunt, and you folks know it.
Show your kids the video and tell them you support his behavior and see what happens. The more you talk the more I am certain about my thoughts of you.
I feel sorry for your kids... Somebody call DHS
You disagree with someone on ATS, first you threaten to kill them by shooting them in the face at their front door (recorded and saved) , now you are suggesting that DHS should come after them?
It's not even illegal in your nation to do this. Look up your own laws.
I believe if in a higher level world, such a sudden deviant behavior would occur, they would all be aware that some consequences were going to follow spiritually and wish to send as much Love, Light, Healing Energy, Support, Encouragement to make a turn around and inner change, to mitigate or remove any consequence and provide support to him and his whole family/daughter.
Originally posted by Unity_99
But at the same time, no world survives in a vacuum. If this was an advanced world, would we all be discussing this situation like this?
We should be sending our best wishes, prayers, love, and envisioning healing and ultimately the happiness of this entire family and everyone in any family anywhere. However in his case there is also the position of responsibility he has as a judge.
Originally posted by muzzleflash
Originally posted by Realtruth
Originally posted by JohnySeagull
Do people cosider this a life sentence crime?
Never happen.
They have to abide by State Statues, most like 10 to 20 worst case, but this will not happen here.
In fact I can't find a single nation on Earth where this act is technically illegal.
I wonder why it's so difficult to pinpoint one?
Any help would be gracious, just for a little side-project for fun you know?
The court heard arguments on both sides of the debate and ruled by a 6-3 margin that the law was constitutional and should stand. Writing for the majority, Chief Justice Beverley McLachlin stated that under Section 43, criminal law does not apply when force "is part of a genuine effort to educate the child, poses no reasonable risk of harm that is more than transitory and trifling, and is reasonable under the circumstances."
Changes to the section were recommended, however. In her decision, McLachlin ruled out the use of corporal punishment for children under age two or for teenagers. She also came out against using instruments such as rulers and belts, or striking a child on the face or head....
The bill was eventually amended to allow parents and caregivers to use force in very specific situations — such as a small smack to the hand to stop a child who is about to do something dangerous or harmful. But routine discipline and the use of spanking as premeditated punishment wouldn't be allowed.
The bill passed its third reading in the Senate in June 2008 and moved to the House of Commons for approval before it could become law. The House never held a vote, however, as Parliament was dissolved for an election.
Originally posted by muzzleflash
Originally posted by NadaCambia
That's because you cannot read, it seems.
It's not that laws don't exist, it that you're seemingly unable to comprehend the ones already in placeedit on 2-11-2011 by NadaCambia because: (no reason given)
The Children Act 1989 defines “harm” as ill-treatment (including sexual abuse and nonphysical forms of ill-treatment) or the impairment of health (physical or mental) or development (physical, intellectual, emotional, social or behavioural) (section 31). “Significant” is not defined in the Act, although it does say that the court should compare the health and development of the child “with that which could be reasonably expected of a similar child”. So the courts have to decide for themselves what constitutes “significant harm” by looking at the facts of each individual case.
Looks like I am reading fairly accurately.
Why didn't you even bother to read your OWN LAWS before you disputed me?
This is laughable.
Originally posted by Stormdancer777
reply to post by Unity_99
I believe if in a higher level world, such a sudden deviant behavior would occur, they would all be aware that some consequences were going to follow spiritually and wish to send as much Love, Light, Healing Energy, Support, Encouragement to make a turn around and inner change, to mitigate or remove any consequence and provide support to him and his whole family/daughter.
Yes, it is a cycle, he probably had it done to him.
Originally posted by muzzleflash
So in the end, I will defend a parents right to beat their child, even if it goes beyond what I personally find acceptable.
It's not our business.
How about I come into all of your houses and tell you how to live?
Originally posted by sputniksteve
I don't quite understand how you are equating that paragraph you pasted to Child abuse being legal? Doesn't it say right there that harming your child is bad and it could be up to the court to decide how significant the harm is done? What am I missing here?
Originally posted by muzzleflash
reply to post by Unity_99
There was no reasonable risk of harm from a few belt lashings.
So even in Canada, per your own legal definitions, it is not technically abuse.