It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
So sit down, shut up, and allow this to go on until the conclusion. If he has nothing to hide, then you have nothing to defend him for
Originally posted by paxnatus
I am gonna step in for Liberty here......
Where do you get off telling anyone to sit down and shut up? It's called FREE SPEECH, Fallen!
Many have pointed their finger and screamed GUILTY!! while having zero hard evidence most is circumstantial at best!!
So tell me "all knowing" where is the evidence??
As for Obama, the press left him alone!
Your boy, Obama evaded every question possible.....
However, I care greatly that Obama or a sitting President actual be a legal citizen! The fact that he refused, evaded, blamed insane conspiracy theorists gave me great cause about his eligibility to hold office.
Originally posted by Eurisko2012
The dirty tricks crowd has already moved on to smearing Newt. He is doing great in the polls but apparently is dirty with some $$$ taken for advising Fannie Mae & Freddie Mac.
The dirty tricks crowd has already moved on to smearing Newt.
Originally posted by OutKast Searcher
reply to post by Eurisko2012
The dirty tricks crowd has already moved on to smearing Newt.
You don't need dirty tricks to smear Newt...he does a fine job of that himself.
Newt has more dirty laundry than any of the candidates...and people say he is "winning" debates...but he isn't answering a single question...he just bashes Obama on every answer he has.
That shows what GOP voters are looking for...they want an attack dog...not someone who will be good for the country. Which is fine with me, because that will fail in the General Election when substance matters.
Originally posted by Blackmarketeer
This guy is a comedian, keep him locked up in a board room somewhere where he can grope all the women he wants and shuck and jive for the money men like the Koch Bros.
"I just apprecate the fact that he was kind enough to spend some time and give me his perspective on the Middle East and a lot of these other countries around the world.
Originally posted by OutKast Searcher
Wow...people are going nuts in this thread. I haven't really read this thread before because this issue is already over. I was curious because it is staying on active.
This is just one of many problems Cain has at the moment...he is screwing up right and left these days. And for people to ask "why did these women come out now"....because when he denied the first two cases...other women thought it was important for everyone to know that Cain has a history of this kind of behavior.
5 women...multiple people confirming their stories...financial settlements...when Cain claims he doesn't remember ANY of this...that is suspect. When he later claims he has magically conjured up some hidden memories...that is just more Cain is trying to hide something...that is clear...and to do it he is trying to trash these women's image (hint: not a smart thing to do when you are accused of sexual harrasment/assault). He is making jokes about other victims (Anita Hill) and he is using gender insulting terms (Princess Nancy). For anyone to say "Oh, Cain is 100% innocent"...I think they have their head buried deeply somewhere.
Bottom line, it doesn't matter if Cain is guilty or not...he failed at handling the situation in a respectable way, and he is paying for it. He is already failing hard in the polls and people are already looking to Newt as the next challenger to Romney. Cain's campaign has ended IMO...I actually hope he still wins the nomination because Obama would wipe the floor with him.
Originally posted by Blackmarketeer
reply to post by Eurisko2012
Asking Cain what his policy on Libya would be is now a "dirty trick"???
"Mr Cain what is your policy on Libya?"
WHOA HOLD ON THERE, Don't answer that question Herman, it's a DIRTY TRICK!
You know, the real dirty trick is that corporate shills like Herman Cain got this far in the debates being this clueless about foreign policy with countries like Ubek-beki-beki-beki-stan-stan.
This guy is a comedian, keep him locked up in a board room somewhere where he can grope all the women he wants and shuck and jive for the money men like the Koch Bros.
Originally posted by Eurisko2012
The Libya question was NOT a dirty trick. Herman Cain looked incompetent.
It is what it is. He is still a good VP candidate.
Originally posted by sweetliberty
Gloria Cain interview. Part 1, 2 and 3
Greta Van Susteren interview with Gloria Cain. I couldn't find this on you tube and I don't know how to add the video's in the format it's in, but this link will take you to the interview.
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
Originally posted by Eurisko2012
The Libya question was NOT a dirty trick. Herman Cain looked incompetent.
It is what it is. He is still a good VP candidate.
You do know that if something happens to the president, the VP takes the job, right? You're OK with having an incompetent man first in line for the presidency?
I am not.
I would make a better president than Herman Cain. Dude, YOU would make a better president than Herman Cain...
All he needs to do is sit down and
have an hour long conversation with Condoleezza Rice.
Heyyyyyyyyy :lol;
Herman Cain had a very long brain fart!
He's practically a rocket scientist and for a man, .... it's rare but he also has common sense. The man is hardly incompetent.
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
Originally posted by Eurisko2012
The Libya question was NOT a dirty trick. Herman Cain looked incompetent.
It is what it is. He is still a good VP candidate.
You do know that if something happens to the president, the VP takes the job, right? You're OK with having an incompetent man first in line for the presidency?
I am not.
I would make a better president than Herman Cain. Dude, YOU would make a better president than Herman Cain...
Originally posted by OutKast Searcher
reply to post by sweetliberty
Heyyyyyyyyy :lol;
Herman Cain had a very long brain fart!
He's practically a rocket scientist and for a man, .... it's rare but he also has common sense. The man is hardly incompetent.
Is this a serious statment or sarcasm???
When a man answers every debate quesiton with "999"...including non-economic questions....you can't say that he has common sense.
Or maybe I'm comparing apples and oranges