It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow
reply to post by lifttheveil
No. He doesn't make a good point really. If that officer supported them "in his off time" he wouldnt be able to bring himself to fire tear gas and rubber bullets at them later when he was on duty.
That guy you are responding to has been making ridiculous claims every change he gets.
Originally posted by pianopraze
loudly shouting against OWS...
Originally posted by v1rtu0s0
S+F. This is what I've been talking about. They want a reason to shut the protests down. Thus they must put the focus on the protestors themselves by instigating violence.
Originally posted by jibeho
reply to post by Corruption Exposed
7 pages in this thread and still no proof any provocative actions by any of the alleged officers in the video. Your thread title indicates Proof!.
Cops infiltrating the camps is no big deal. I'd be willing to wager that the FBI has campers in place also.
"Know Your Enemy"- Sun Tzu "The Art of War"
Originally posted by Corruption Exposed
Originally posted by jibeho
reply to post by Corruption Exposed
7 pages in this thread and still no proof any provocative actions by any of the alleged officers in the video. Your thread title indicates Proof!.
Cops infiltrating the camps is no big deal. I'd be willing to wager that the FBI has campers in place also.
"Know Your Enemy"- Sun Tzu "The Art of War"
The video shows the provocative actions. Some members have even taken the liberty of listing the exact times in the video that these actions occurred. How about you watch the vid or reread the thread. Your definition of provocation may be slightly different than mine, but the root definition cannot be disputed.
Seven pages and you missed the goods on page one
ETA: I starred that last comment by accident. I want my star backedit on 1-11-2011 by Corruption Exposed because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow
reply to post by jibeho
How do you not see that these cops are working the protests plain clothed?
Proof is given. Whether you want to be foolish and not see it for what it is is up to you.
These cops are going down to support protesters and then shooting tear gas and rubber bullets at them later.
We represent the 645 police officers who work hard every day to protect the citizens of Oakland. We, too, are the 99% fighting for better working conditions, fair treatment and the ability to provide a living for our children and families. We are severely understaffed with many City beats remaining unprotected by police during the day and evening hours.
As your police officers, we are confused.
On Tuesday, October 25th, we were ordered by Mayor Quan to clear out the encampments at Frank Ogawa Plaza and to keep protesters out of the Plaza. We performed the job that the Mayor’s Administration asked us to do, being fully aware that past protests in Oakland have resulted in rioting, violence and destruction of property.
Then, on Wednesday, October 26th, the Mayor allowed protesters back in – to camp out at the very place they were evacuated from the day before.
To add to the confusion, the Administration issued a memo on Friday, October 28th to all City workers in support of the “Stop Work” strike scheduled for Wednesday, giving all employees, except for police officers, permission to take the day off.
That’s hundreds of City workers encouraged to take off work to participate in the protest against “the establishment.” But aren’t the Mayor and her Administration part of the establishment they are paying City employees to protest? Is it the City’s intention to have City employees on both sides of a skirmish line?
It is all very confusing to us.
Meanwhile, a message has been sent to all police officers: Everyone, including those who have the day off, must show up for work on Wednesday. This is also being paid for by Oakland taxpayers. Last week’s events alone cost Oakland taxpayers over $1 million.
The Mayor and her Administration are beefing up police presence for Wednesday’s work strike they are encouraging and even “staffing,” spending hundreds of thousands of taxpayer dollars for additional police presence – at a time when the Mayor is also asking Oakland residents to vote on an $80 parcel tax to bail out the City’s failing finances.
All of these mixed messages are confusing.
Originally posted by Nietrick
Of course there will be infiltration and some instigation. This is to be expected. However, I would caution against blindly believing that *no* actual Occupiers are engaging in or being willing to engage in violence. This will happen, too. That's why the police go in to stir things up....it works. Like it or not, the " left " tends to have a higher opinion of violent means for bringing about social change. You didn't see much violence at Tea Party rallies because it's harder to stir that group up.
Fred Shavies and I are both from Oakland, and are both photographers. I was acquainted with him because of some mutual friends and interests. When I saw the Copwatch video I recognized him. I saw (from his twitter feed) that he had seen the video, and he had posted a comment identifying with the 99%. I contacted him and asked if he was willing to discuss on camera. He agreed. We filmed the interview the following day.
Originally posted by jibeho
Where is the evidence of these guys being provocateurs?? That is where the line is crossed. They have nothing to gain by provoking violence that may actually lead to one of their fellow officers getting hurt or killed..