Fliers Drop on Occupy Chicago Protesters

Originally posted by Honor93

Originally posted by radosta

Originally posted by InformationAccount

Originally posted by sonnny1

Theres a lot of Anger at the Government for keeping poor people poor.

Imagine a government,where you dont pay Taxes?

Where there is NO Fed Reserve?

That's been done before Comrade.

It's called Communism or Totalitarianism

"The Theory and Practice of Oligarchical Collectivism by Goldstein - (How You Are Controlled)"
www.abovetopsecret.com...

edit on 29-10-2011 by InformationAccount because: (no reason given)

...Well...it certainly has been done before.
But the 2nd part of your answer is where you go a little off. It was done in the United States before the creation of the Federal Reserve and the adoption of the federal income tax under Woodrow Wilson's "progressive" administration. Also happened to coincide with banking/corporate domination of the US government. Coincidence?

Unless you consider a more decentralized, republican (small "r"), and more relatively free and egalitarian society to be "totalitarian", I would have to disagree.

huh?, what in the world ?? ... and how did you come up with this nonsense ???

the Federal Reserve and its practices have NEVER been removed from the system since its inception.
where do you get "it certainly has been done before" ????
link please

Communism is not equal to or a result of eliminating the masters you serve today ~ ie ... the Federal Reserve
not every path leads to communism, why would you think it must?

the US government was not established to "collect taxes".
ah geeeez, if you're gonna tell the story, please get it right ... try this ... Woodrow signed the FR into existence

Also happened to coincide with banking/corporate domination of the US government.

you sure about that ??
might wanna check out JPMorgans influence some 50yrs earlier and few others along the way.
start at the link above and get back to us with some correct input, eh?

Someone please explain this quote to me, from the Federal Reserve website, because it sounds like double speak

... a decentralized central bank that balanced the competing interests of private banks and populist sentiment.

www.federalreserveeducation.org...

Originally posted by Honor93
the US government was not established to "collect taxes".

Indeed we fought against mindless taxation without representation

The taxation of labor to fund a fiat leveraged (Fake) money system that benifits those who inheirit thier wealth is just plain wrong.

And now we have the bailouts (fake money covering fake money behind the Veil - Read Tarp)

They offer us nothing. There is nothing good about what they do or who they are. Gambling is not a job and it is not respectable. If Wall Street vanished, we would be the better for it in almost every single way. When we stopped making things within our borders and replaced our manufacturing with casinos, it was not a step up.

What a load of crock. Who would believe this except for brain-dead fox news zombies who would go running with it. Geesh

reply to post by InformationAccount

if you mean this blurb, i would agree ... it reads like classic double-speak.
and, i believe it was intended that way. there wasn't much in the way of national communications back then ... debate and dispute was usually contained within the circles of the decision-makers, not the ppl they represented.

From December 1912 to December 1913, the Glass-Willis proposal was hotly debated, molded and reshaped. By December 23, 1913, when President Woodrow Wilson signed the Federal Reserve Act into law, it stood as a classic example of compromise—a decentralized central bank that balanced the competing interests of private banks and populist sentiment.

Explaining it in detail is more than i am prepared to do right now, but here's the gist of it ...
Although a truly centralized system, the FR was promoted to and accepted by the public as "de-centralized" due to the regional management, Board of Governors and appointed districts (12 of'em).
these 12 regions or districts seemed and were presented as "de-centralized" to those in both the private and public sectors ... especially to those who demonized any central or national system. (the majority btw)

with enough double-speak, the Act was passed (although not unanimously).
since that time, many changes to the system have occurred but it is still a centralized system that operates outside Constitutional authority. (and, the majority [albeit a smaller one] still oppose it)

here's another link you may find helpful ... FDIC / historical analysis
this page link is to the savings & loan crisis from the 80s but you can surf & search the site at will.

the Federal Reserve, as primary manipulator / speculator, they and they alone control both inflation and deflation across the board. Add the other Global banks into the mix and you can easily understand why the ppl need and should invest in themselves at a member-owned, community credit union.

fyi, mega-banks haven't always been in the investment/broker business ... they received that privilege around turn of the century ... 1999 or thereabouts. This whole mess has been one manipulation after another with the sole purpose of driving the ppl into oppression via an imaginary boogey-man (fiat funding)

The taxation of labor to fund a fiat leveraged (Fake) money system that benifits those who inheirit thier wealth is just plain wrong.

i cannot wholly agree with this statement (for the most part it's correct tho) but after you understand the system better, perhaps you're opinion will adjust accordingly.

it would be unfair and wrong to agree that everyone who inherits excessive wealth is evil or selfish or even undeserving. besides, it is not my place to judge them.
sure, i have opinions about many of them but again, tis just an opinion.