It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by area6
Hoax
1) If you're the real deal you prepare a proper patent that spells out what you have so you can properly protect it. "Secrets" are for people that are lying
Originally posted by area6
2) There's no need to build a 1MW power plant to prove the concept. This is grandstanding - and it's a primary tool that con artists use to misdirect attention away from the facts
Originally posted by area6
3) Allowing independent testing of the technology is the ONLY way to prove it. That's how real science works (peer review, duplicate and verify)
Originally posted by area6
If his technology was real, he could easily and instantly start licensing it to companies that would make it a reality. HE is the one suppressing his own technology. Therefore, it's a hoax. Simple logic IMO.
Originally posted by area6
reply to post by Cuervo
Every point you make reinforces my points if you really think about it.
If I had a nickel for every "secret sauce" business idea or magic technology I've had people hit me with over the years ... I'd could probably bail out Greece.
Originally posted by area6
Hoax
1) If you're the real deal you prepare a proper patent that spells out what you have so you can properly protect it. "Secrets" are for people that are lying
2) There's no need to build a 1MW power plant to prove the concept. This is grandstanding - and it's a primary tool that con artists use to misdirect attention away from the facts
3) Allowing independent testing of the technology is the ONLY way to prove it. That's how real science works (peer review, duplicate and verify)
If his technology was real, he could easily and instantly start licensing it to companies that would make it a reality. HE is the one suppressing his own technology. Therefore, it's a hoax. Simple logic IMO.
Originally posted by area6
Hoax
1) If you're the real deal you prepare a proper patent that spells out what you have so you can properly protect it. "Secrets" are for people that are lying
2) There's no need to build a 1MW power plant to prove the concept. This is grandstanding - and it's a primary tool that con artists use to misdirect attention away from the facts
3) Allowing independent testing of the technology is the ONLY way to prove it. That's how real science works (peer review, duplicate and verify)
If his technology was real, he could easily and instantly start licensing it to companies that would make it a reality. HE is the one suppressing his own technology. Therefore, it's a hoax. Simple logic IMO.
Originally posted by deckdel
The customer is DARPA or associated organisation.
www.abovetopsecret.com...
So, this will never come out to save the mankind.edit on 29-10-2011 by deckdel because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by LanternOfDiogenes
Please stop shooting this down based on infancy of the tech... 400w=1mw is good math, why friggin argue?
NyTeknik did discover one possible clue to their identity. The customer's controller, one Domenico Fioravanti, apparently reports to a man whose title is "Colonel".
Originally posted by deckdel
The customer is DARPA or associated organisation.
www.abovetopsecret.com...
So, this will never come out to save the mankind.edit on 29-10-2011 by deckdel because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by eroutt
like me! i would love it if ATS would create a new forum for new energy devices.
i am sure others would love to see what people are building at home. its amazing!
Originally posted by eroutt
i would love it if ATS would create a new forum for new energy devices. i am sure others would love to see what people are building at home. its amazing!