Japanese University Detects Atmospheric Precursor To 2011 Megaquake

Originally posted by TiM3LoRd
Not sure if this has been brought up before BUT if we are talking about an event that's a precursor to an earthquake, then following the logic that we live in a somewhat linear reality and cause is followed by effect. I would theorize that whatever energy is increasing the number of electrons is causing the earthquakes. Which would mean the source is external. My guess would be the sun or some other galactic source.

So for instance the energy is created in the sun and expands outward like a shock wave. The gravitational and electromagnetic fields of all astral bodies between us and the sun are like rocks on the shore of the ocean creating turbulence in the shock wave, not to mention our moon.

Then there is one minor detail everyone overlooks:

We only just got to the point in time where there the technology exists and was placed to look for it. (Ironically it also leads folks in error ask "Why are there more EQ's than last year....?"

It's not that there are any more or less, but our systems of tracking them has improved as has reporting them.

It's not to say this heating effect has not been present since there have been earth quakes. We only really started monitoring quakes in the late 1800's. We've only had the Internet as ARPNET, since around of the 1968. So if you will the seismo nets we have in place only really started to form in the later 1980s.

30 years later we are still just getting all the tools in place to where we can -respond- to Earth quakes, just as they happen. The folks doing the best at it, are the Japanese. As they have a 'shake net' to where things monitored get transmitted to a local site and then as the alarms trip, back out to the public. Unless a Japanese city is right on the fault when it goes off, the distant larger cities have a few minutes to prep for a quake. Minutes.

Once there is a system that can monitor this new precursor, it is still going to take data collection and major design implementations to be able to use it. An if they come up with a good enough network of collection/monitoring towers and can get a solid factually percentage based 'trigger point worked out' to 'declare a quake alert'; they'd have from hours to half an hour, if they are lucky to prepare and respond.

Quake scientist's are like the storm chase chases we have out in the field during severe weather. However, they are still largely working in the 'short mere moments' before or after quake has occurred. Tornadoes though, we have a bit better chance of getting the alarm off and warning a city before it gets hit, because the technology was pushed by by 'the survivors of disasters' forcing politicians to do something. Hurricane monitoring etc being a similar forced issue.

Sadly, the main need for such science driven research is funding. But with out a major 'epic' loss of life and property, our government in the USA isn't going to do it. Citing it as "too costly," neglecting the fact that recovering from such a disaster and lives lost because a warning system could have been developed, but wasn't is even more damaging to our economy.

Reactionary Darwinism in an self created economic emergency.....

I'll have a beer.

M.

On the day of the Sendai earthquake 11 March 2011 and the resulting tsunami, here in the UK my computer suffered complete electronic death due to a massive solar flare induced very strong polarity reversal "power surge" in the mains power supply. I have subsequently bought myself a new computer. This is called geomagnetic induction and is a bit like EMP [electromanetic pulse]. It occurred at the very same time as the earthquake struck in Japan. Do you know that these earthquakes are being caused by the presence of a rogue planet that is now in the solar system at around about the orbital altitude of Saturn [it is probably nearer the asteroid belt by now] and for want of a less controversal name the object is being called "Nibiru" ? Nothing to do with Zacharia Sitchkin. It is five to six times the mass of Jupiter. It is an optically dark perhaps invisible object only detected using infrared telescopes. As seen from earth it is in the Constellation of Leo. Look and you will find it. Use the night vision [infrared setting] on a digital camera to take pictures of the night sky. Or better still why not buy some infrared film for a normal photographic camera. It is dead centre in the plane of the ecliptic and moving incredibly slowly. Just last week a massive CME [coronal mass ejection] erupted from the Sun in its direction causing very wide spread aurora borealis right down into areas of the USA even as far south as the gulf states. Aurora austrealis too. At the time of the Sendai earthquake the Earth and Sun and "Nibiru" were in perfect alignment. We will be in such a perfect alignment again this coming March 2012. Only at that time the related phenomenon will probably be even stronger since we as a planet will be very much nearer to it. Also in July/August of 2013 there is the possibility that "Nibiru" and Jupiter might collide. Thus I suggest to you that the Sendai earthquake 11 March 2011 in Japan was induced by the geomagnetic induction caused by the "negative" magnetic polarity of "Nibiru" as it is plunging into our solar system. Does this observation help explain why there was such an ionospheric heating in the lead up to the earthquake ?

AVE RAEGINA CAELINA LA DEUS NOSTRA CAELI LA VERA DEUS

reply to post by Moshpet


I read an article that out of the thousands of (last ditch efforts for Japan to turn the tide of WWII), that one balloon actually killed one American. It happened in Oregon, during a family picnic years after the war ended, an inquisitive young boy saw the balloon on the ground nearby and disturbed it and an explosive actually went off killing him.

I'm not sure how I could Google a reference to support that, maybe some other folks here have more search savvy than me or have heard about that as well. It would rest comfortably with me if it was just tall tale and I was deceived by the story.

Originally posted by Illustronic
reply to post by Moshpet

 

I read an article that out of the thousands of (last ditch efforts for Japan to turn the tide of WWII), that one balloon actually killed one American. It happened in Oregon, during a family picnic years after the war ended, an inquisitive young boy saw the balloon on the ground nearby and disturbed it and an explosive actually went off killing him.

I'm not sure how I could Google a reference to support that, maybe some other folks here have more search savvy than me or have heard about that as well. It would rest comfortably with me if it was just tall tale and I was deceived by the story.

Here's a link, it was six people killed;
linky

A Finnish Nuclear Scientist says Russia detected Ionized Radiation in the atmosphere coming from Japans nuclear reactors....BEFORE the Earthquake....so Russia used it's HAARP to push up on the upper atmosphere to change the wind patterns to protect Russia....make it blow the other way.

The emitted Microwaves pushing up on the upper atmosphere reflects down and the reflection point was East of Japan into the Pacific Ocean. The crystaline rocks absorbed the microwave energy which created an Earthquake....that caused the Tsunami:

www.youtube.com...


He says countries created HAARP technology to steer Ionized Radiation that leaks from nuclear reactors away from their cities. It's a Defense Tool. Russia did it in self defense.

Hence the Fukushima "Pointing Man":

www.youtube.com...


They're blaming Russia. But it was self defense.

Originally posted by bobs_uruncle
Can HAARP increase TEC, yes! But is a TEC increase the cause of the earthquake or is it the result of an earthquake? If a TEC increase is the cause, then we should see many more very large earthquakes during CME's and other extraplanetary events that cause TEC increases, however, we don't. So I would say that TEC increase is an effect of earthquakes, which is still good to know, since if one can factor out all of the other TEC causing events, you are left with a 40 minute prediction window.

Cheers - Dave

Hey Dave.

I don't think this reasoning is complete. IF TEC increase is seen before most large quakes, it could mean that it's a major factor, but other triggers are needed. This could explain why we don't see many more, but perhaps there still are more overall.

reply to post by Pervius


It's been spewing out for months now, not just the initial blasts.

So that makes no sense.

I mean, if this were the case, why didn't we steer the winds away from our cities

Wow. I connected the TEC and earthquakes back in March!!

TEC & Earthquakes

Check out the old post. Tons of info.

Originally posted by unityemissions

Originally posted by bobs_uruncle
Can HAARP increase TEC, yes! But is a TEC increase the cause of the earthquake or is it the result of an earthquake? If a TEC increase is the cause, then we should see many more very large earthquakes during CME's and other extraplanetary events that cause TEC increases, however, we don't. So I would say that TEC increase is an effect of earthquakes, which is still good to know, since if one can factor out all of the other TEC causing events, you are left with a 40 minute prediction window.

Cheers - Dave

Hey Dave.

I don't think this reasoning is complete. IF TEC increase is seen before most large quakes, it could mean that it's a major factor, but other triggers are needed. This could explain why we don't see many more, but perhaps there still are more overall.

Yeah, I think it's pretty complete. If you factor out the real time measured values of all other TEC causing events while they are occurring you are left looking at only TEC events caused by earthquakes. Seems pretty simple to me, it's a bit reductionist but that's science, remove all the other processes and artifacts, see what's left and then see if it's repeatable.

As far as HAARP goes, as I said, it can easily increase electron density in specific areas causing heating in the upper atmosphere. However, I do believe they can bounce that sucker off the ionosphere and target specific areas. Now if I were a mad scientist and wanted to create an earthquake, hmmm, what would I do? Well first off I would start by setting up a resonant wave tuned to the earth itself by using the earth's interior as the resonant cavity. Then I would just keep that frequency hitting that same location like a drum beat over time. Yes, you will get loss on the bounce, BUT, every time you hit that focal point the waves sum. Eventually something has to give...

I don't believe however that the TEC increase over an earthquake site is the direct result of HAARP focusing, the angle is all wrong for an ionospheric bounce. Just my thoughts though from my underground lab in the caverns of Ix.

Cheers - Dave

Originally posted by yellowbeard

Originally posted by Illustronic
reply to post by Moshpet

 

I read an article that out of the thousands of (last ditch efforts for Japan to turn the tide of WWII), that one balloon actually killed one American. It happened in Oregon, during a family picnic years after the war ended, an inquisitive young boy saw the balloon on the ground nearby and disturbed it and an explosive actually went off killing him.

I'm not sure how I could Google a reference to support that, maybe some other folks here have more search savvy than me or have heard about that as well. It would rest comfortably with me if it was just tall tale and I was deceived by the story.

Here's a link, it was six people killed;
linky

Hey thanks for that link!!! I didn't know that. Do you know when it was that Americans were actually beat on their own soil by a foreign force? And here's two funny links (same song on done live in the US)...




Cheers - Dave