It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The Truth Is Viral: The Real Herman Cain (part one)
page: 5share:
reply to post by ThirdEyeofHorus
You replied to me, wrong member.... Carry on...
You replied to me, wrong member.... Carry on...
edit on 25-10-2011 by Jason88 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
Clarification: He said he wouldn't be comfortable unless the person was completely loyal to the Constitution.
LOL.....Cain is obviously not loyal to the Constitution because he was a officer of the FED!!!!
This should automatically disqualify him from anyone who cares about retaining their Constitutional rights.
I haven't heard anyone speak of Constitution Party candidate for president Chuck Baldwin ....
It couldn't be that the elite don't want ANOTHER person with integrity on the boob tube speaking to the masses about the Constitution and how our tyrannical gov't is completely violating and destroying it?
edit on 25-10-2011 by SecondAmendmentUser because: (no reason given)
I'm glad you mentioned " Anwar al-Awlaki , " because he has apparent ties too " Al-Qaeda and Al-Shabaab." Which is affiliated to "
AQAP " and
" Ahmed
Abdulkadir warsame . "
This guy wreaks of evil anyway. He looks down on the empoverished and says that they are jealous of the rich when the reality is that the protesters
are but a few who were robbed by people like him. I heard himself, liken himself to Moses when he delivered the jews from bondage and his "999"
plan...looks suspiciously like an inverted "666". Somehow he remains in the lead, despite Ron Paul smoking his @ss at every turn.
reply to post by AboveTopSecret.com
I did not watch the video. I'm sorry. Have you realized that every presidential candidate had some kind of just not rightness going on? So does it even matter forget all these wacky candidates and this stupid government. The government is like a cheating secretive and nosey bombardment of ignorance.
I did not watch the video. I'm sorry. Have you realized that every presidential candidate had some kind of just not rightness going on? So does it even matter forget all these wacky candidates and this stupid government. The government is like a cheating secretive and nosey bombardment of ignorance.
Originally posted by OldCorp
Originally posted by Chance321
Can we count on a video on "The Real obama?" You know, one that explaines why his college transcripts were sealed? Why he won't release them? Why he won't release his medical records? Why anyone that disagrees with him gets labeled racist? Why he hasn't submitted a budget since he's been in office? Why if he holds his czars in such high reguard why he won't have them vested through congress or the senate? Now I'd like to see a video on that obama, never will cause I know what way the winds blowing, you never question obama.
Part 2 questions Obama PLENTY.
Is it up yet? With all due respect, I'd love to see it, but I seriously doubt obama would be asked any hard hitting questions, it's just not done.
Originally posted by burntheships
reply to post by wbf850
Can you spell Globalist?
C ..........ounsil
F ..........oriegn
R...........relations
Headed by Rockerfellers... who have this to say:
Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as 'internationalists' and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure — one world, if you will. If that is the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.
David Rockerfeller's 2002 "Memoirs" ISBN 0-679-40588-7 Chapter 27 "Proud Internationalist" Page 405
reply to post by AboveTopSecret.com
Great report, great work.
Of-course Awlaki had to be killed, just like every other US ally and asset who's usefulness has expired.
Its no coincidence that he was dining at the Pentagon, the cover story being that he was not an "extremist" at the time. Sure he wasn't. Neither was Osama, Saddam, Mubarak, the Shah and all the other friendly US backed tyrants.
Anwar al-Awlaki Dined at Pentagon after 9/11
Cain is a fraud. Romney is a fraud. Perry is a fraud. Newt is a fraud. Obama is a fraud.
WAKE UP. Its not too late.
Great report, great work.
Of-course Awlaki had to be killed, just like every other US ally and asset who's usefulness has expired.
Its no coincidence that he was dining at the Pentagon, the cover story being that he was not an "extremist" at the time. Sure he wasn't. Neither was Osama, Saddam, Mubarak, the Shah and all the other friendly US backed tyrants.
Anwar al-Awlaki Dined at Pentagon after 9/11
Cain is a fraud. Romney is a fraud. Perry is a fraud. Newt is a fraud. Obama is a fraud.
WAKE UP. Its not too late.
edit on 25-10-2011 by gladtobehere because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by taurean86
I did not watch the video. I'm sorry. Have you realized that every presidential candidate had some kind of just not rightness going on? So does it even matter forget all these wacky candidates and this stupid government. The government is like a cheating secretive and nosey bombardment of ignorance.
Very well said indeed! It is almost like these ghouls of the elite are dishing up this group of gargoyle candidates (ex Ron Paul) to provoke those that know they are being patronized in the worst way and insulted to boot.
I suppose if the criminal rulers want a heaping helping of second amendment medicine they will eventually get it. You can only poke a hibernating bear so long before it will get up and tear the head off of its annoyance.
edit on 25-10-2011 by SecondAmendmentUser because: (no reason
given)
Originally posted by taurean86
reply to post by AboveTopSecret.com
I did not watch the video. I'm sorry. Have you realized that every presidential candidate had some kind of just not rightness going on? So does it even matter forget all these wacky candidates and this stupid government. The government is like a cheating secretive and nosey bombardment of ignorance.
That right there.
Politicians are scumbags.
Originally posted by Chance321
Originally posted by OldCorp
Originally posted by Chance321
Can we count on a video on "The Real obama?" You know, one that explaines why his college transcripts were sealed? Why he won't release them? Why he won't release his medical records? Why anyone that disagrees with him gets labeled racist? Why he hasn't submitted a budget since he's been in office? Why if he holds his czars in such high reguard why he won't have them vested through congress or the senate? Now I'd like to see a video on that obama, never will cause I know what way the winds blowing, you never question obama.
Part 2 questions Obama PLENTY.
Is it up yet? With all due respect, I'd love to see it, but I seriously doubt obama would be asked any hard hitting questions, it's just not done.
It's in post production as we speak. I gave up on setting times, much as Harold Camping should have, but it will be in the next day or two.
Originally posted by Jason88
reply to post by ThirdEyeofHorus
You replied to me, wrong member.... Carry on...edit on 25-10-2011 by Jason88 because: (no reason given)
Oh dear! I do apologize profusely.
I want to address a comment someone made regarding faith not effecting someones ability to govern. Faith helps determine someones moral compass and
if they are true to their faith it influences everything about their life. Voters should understand that if you elect a devout Christian those
beliefs will be implemented to the best of their ability. A candidate won't disregard their faith for the sake of neutrality in government. It will
never happen. The problem is elected officials have forgotten that they are put in office to execute the will of the people not make decisions based
on their personal moral code.
I think Ron Paul is far and away the Candidate with the best plan to fix some of the damage done to this country. But I have to talk about this crap Oldcorp has put out there. It's no better than the slants of any other news outlet anywhere. And the fact that he seems to think he's doing it better and more objective than anyone else is a joke. He's putting out a rip piece on Cain and a puff up on Paul. He then claims in a post that it's the only way to form an objective opinion.
The phone call issue was just childish and a total waste of airtime. Schedules change. Things happen. Stating unequivocally that your call was being ducked is an opinion, not a fact. And with everything going on campaignwise I tend to think the ramblings of a popcorn reporter with an obvious slant against his candidate isn't high on the priority list. So if his schedule did get jacked up Oldcorp certainly wasn't high on the list.
The really sad thing is oldcorp seems to think he's being objective. Listening to the puff piece on paul at the end makes it obvious that there isn't anything objective about it. Ron Paul has never lied or flip flopped? I support Paul, but Old corp, what you said is a lie. You lied. Because Ron Paul has lied and flip/or flip flopped. Here's a prime example...
Ron Paul is a MD. He's a devout Christian as well. In May of 2007 at an interview of GOP candidates, the candidates were asked about their view on evolution. Paul stated he did believe in evolution. In december of 2007 in a different interview he stated that he believes in creation. Now at his age we all know his opinion of that issue didn't change. He's a man of faith who always believed in creation. Which would make his initial answer a lie. Which would make the 2nd answer a flip flop. I like Paul. but I wouldn't want a physician that denies evolution. He doesn't believe in the adaptive creation, but the genesis variety. That's a weakness in my eyes.
It's also a huge stretch and definitely indicative of yellow journalism when you say no candidate in history has flip flopped as much as Cain. I think Cain is a worthless candidate. And it's sad that you've got someone who recognizes Cain for the joke that he is thinking that your piece is too editorialized and slanted to even fall in the category of legitimate news. Paul has never lied.... Remember the health insurance mandate when he said 16500 new irs agents would be required to enforce it? Remember when he said "16,500 ARMED bureaucrats coming to make this program work." . . . All the IRS agents are gonna be armed, ummm ok. I've seen Paul's ads touting the endorsement from Reagan. But in '88 Paul wanted to totally disassociate himself from Reagan. Paul's 1996 newsletter stating only 5% of blacks have sensible political opinions. Again I support Paul. I love the competing currency plan. He has flaws, he has lied and he has flip flopped. He isn't perfect. But he has some brilliant ideas. And some completely moonbat ideas too.
Nut your piece is not neutral. It doesn't deal in facts. It deals in slanted opinion pieces. Which makes you CNN, MSNBC, Fox, Rush, the same as every other crap news program out there that pretends to be neutral. Here's a brilliant idea. Report facts. Don't color them with your opinion. Report facts and let the people figure it out for themselves. If you don't your just as bad as everyone else. And nobody is going to form the objective opinion you want so badly listening to slanted trash journalism.
Religion is the main reason I can't support Romney. I think anyone who buys into Mormon beliefs is a nut. God demands you tithe ten% forever regardless of your situation. Hot drinks are frowned upon by God. Jesus came to America. They do post mortem baptisms without familial consent. The Church taught Jesus was a polygamist. I don't believe the bible, I understand too much about its history with the codices and it's creation. But the LDS beliefs are crazy and with ROmney believing them I can't trust him to run our country. But that's me.
The sad thing is that every candidate thinks we elect them to rule. We elect them to carry out our wishes and govern based upon OUR beliefs not theirs.
I think Ron Paul is far and away the Candidate with the best plan to fix some of the damage done to this country. But I have to talk about this crap Oldcorp has put out there. It's no better than the slants of any other news outlet anywhere. And the fact that he seems to think he's doing it better and more objective than anyone else is a joke. He's putting out a rip piece on Cain and a puff up on Paul. He then claims in a post that it's the only way to form an objective opinion.
The phone call issue was just childish and a total waste of airtime. Schedules change. Things happen. Stating unequivocally that your call was being ducked is an opinion, not a fact. And with everything going on campaignwise I tend to think the ramblings of a popcorn reporter with an obvious slant against his candidate isn't high on the priority list. So if his schedule did get jacked up Oldcorp certainly wasn't high on the list.
The really sad thing is oldcorp seems to think he's being objective. Listening to the puff piece on paul at the end makes it obvious that there isn't anything objective about it. Ron Paul has never lied or flip flopped? I support Paul, but Old corp, what you said is a lie. You lied. Because Ron Paul has lied and flip/or flip flopped. Here's a prime example...
Ron Paul is a MD. He's a devout Christian as well. In May of 2007 at an interview of GOP candidates, the candidates were asked about their view on evolution. Paul stated he did believe in evolution. In december of 2007 in a different interview he stated that he believes in creation. Now at his age we all know his opinion of that issue didn't change. He's a man of faith who always believed in creation. Which would make his initial answer a lie. Which would make the 2nd answer a flip flop. I like Paul. but I wouldn't want a physician that denies evolution. He doesn't believe in the adaptive creation, but the genesis variety. That's a weakness in my eyes.
It's also a huge stretch and definitely indicative of yellow journalism when you say no candidate in history has flip flopped as much as Cain. I think Cain is a worthless candidate. And it's sad that you've got someone who recognizes Cain for the joke that he is thinking that your piece is too editorialized and slanted to even fall in the category of legitimate news. Paul has never lied.... Remember the health insurance mandate when he said 16500 new irs agents would be required to enforce it? Remember when he said "16,500 ARMED bureaucrats coming to make this program work." . . . All the IRS agents are gonna be armed, ummm ok. I've seen Paul's ads touting the endorsement from Reagan. But in '88 Paul wanted to totally disassociate himself from Reagan. Paul's 1996 newsletter stating only 5% of blacks have sensible political opinions. Again I support Paul. I love the competing currency plan. He has flaws, he has lied and he has flip flopped. He isn't perfect. But he has some brilliant ideas. And some completely moonbat ideas too.
Nut your piece is not neutral. It doesn't deal in facts. It deals in slanted opinion pieces. Which makes you CNN, MSNBC, Fox, Rush, the same as every other crap news program out there that pretends to be neutral. Here's a brilliant idea. Report facts. Don't color them with your opinion. Report facts and let the people figure it out for themselves. If you don't your just as bad as everyone else. And nobody is going to form the objective opinion you want so badly listening to slanted trash journalism.
Religion is the main reason I can't support Romney. I think anyone who buys into Mormon beliefs is a nut. God demands you tithe ten% forever regardless of your situation. Hot drinks are frowned upon by God. Jesus came to America. They do post mortem baptisms without familial consent. The Church taught Jesus was a polygamist. I don't believe the bible, I understand too much about its history with the codices and it's creation. But the LDS beliefs are crazy and with ROmney believing them I can't trust him to run our country. But that's me.
The sad thing is that every candidate thinks we elect them to rule. We elect them to carry out our wishes and govern based upon OUR beliefs not theirs.
Herman Cain is just a way to take votes away from Ron Paul so he cant win. Did you notice that Cain became amazing AFTER Paul was taking a lead. Yeah,
Cain is a moron that basically makes fun of Paul but at the same time enought people believe him to steal vote for Paul so Romney wins.
Great video and points but I can count the amount of ATS open Cain supporters that I've personally experienced with less than all of my fingers.
ATS isn't who we need need to convince that Cain is a pandering flip-flopper, it is the GOP 'establishment voter base' that changes their minds based on which way the media chooses to fart on a daily basis.
There are so many Cain people out there completely oblivious to his 'short-comings'.
I don't know what is more sick, the mainstream media or the people that eat it all up thinking they are up-to-date, following politics watching the news.
ATS isn't who we need need to convince that Cain is a pandering flip-flopper, it is the GOP 'establishment voter base' that changes their minds based on which way the media chooses to fart on a daily basis.
There are so many Cain people out there completely oblivious to his 'short-comings'.
I don't know what is more sick, the mainstream media or the people that eat it all up thinking they are up-to-date, following politics watching the news.
reply to post by eLPresidente
This isn't ATS's opinion, its Oldcorps opinion. He states that clearly at the start of the vid.
Why do people keep insisting otherwise?
This isn't ATS's opinion, its Oldcorps opinion. He states that clearly at the start of the vid.
Why do people keep insisting otherwise?
Hello I can't really come to any conclusions based off of the OP but I wanted to ask OldCorp do you think you are having a hard time getting info from
people b/c you are with ATS? I noticed you had sort of the same problem on your other project comet Elenin.
I see what ATS is trying to do but you may want to disguise yourself as some other media outlet b/c to some folks ATS is a bit like Godlike productions...try saying you are with Prison Planet next time...it might work better
ETA: I notice the mod post above me says this is not ATS's opinion...but it does look to be attached to a ATS sponsored series called The Truth is Viral so my advice remains the same: leave the words AboveTopSecret.com out of the conversation or interview when researching anything.
Just my 2 cents.
I see what ATS is trying to do but you may want to disguise yourself as some other media outlet b/c to some folks ATS is a bit like Godlike productions...try saying you are with Prison Planet next time...it might work better
ETA: I notice the mod post above me says this is not ATS's opinion...but it does look to be attached to a ATS sponsored series called The Truth is Viral so my advice remains the same: leave the words AboveTopSecret.com out of the conversation or interview when researching anything.
Just my 2 cents.
edit on 26-10-2011 by iamusic because: Noticed Post above...
reply to post by neformore
I never insisted such a thing.
Super moderator, read my post and tell me where I specifically stated that the opinions in the video were that of ATS'?
I never insisted such a thing.
Super moderator, read my post and tell me where I specifically stated that the opinions in the video were that of ATS'?
edit on 26-10-2011 by
eLPresidente because: (no reason given)
Herman Cain is merely a puppet for the Fed.As some other posters have pointed out he's there to get votes for Romney.I personally think the none of
the GOP candidates are serious other then Ron Paul,the rest of these guys will be push overs for Obama.If anyone of them gets the nod then we know the
Oligarchs have chosen him.Great Vid OldCorp!
Originally posted by masqua
Originally posted by SteveR
I will defend his right to choose not to have Muslims in his administration.
Just a small, but serious 'what-if' scenario... would you also support a candidate who would refuse to have Christians in his administration? I know it's an impossibility in the near Theocracy which the USA has become, but I think a fair question.
BTW... OC. Great video and reporting.
I support their freedom to make such a statement without labeling them as hate filled or unAmerican, doesn't mean I would vote for them. They should be able to make that statement and let it lie, and if it sits well with people great, if not they wont vote for him. Isn't this what it's suppose to be about?