The Truth Is Viral: The Real Herman Cain (part one)

Originally posted by antar
reply to post by AboveTopSecret.com

 

Well I did not have any expectations Oldcorp, and yet was ultimately surprised to watch this video and discover that I truly support your style of Journalism.

This is going to affect everything.

antar, you ain't seen nothing yet. Wait until next week when I lay down what's really going on in Libya, and how it's connected to Syria and Iran.

Originally posted by Chance321
Can we count on a video on "The Real obama?" You know, one that explaines why his college transcripts were sealed? Why he won't release them? Why he won't release his medical records? Why anyone that disagrees with him gets labeled racist? Why he hasn't submitted a budget since he's been in office? Why if he holds his czars in such high reguard why he won't have them vested through congress or the senate? Now I'd like to see a video on that obama, never will cause I know what way the winds blowing, you never question obama.

Part 2 questions Obama PLENTY.

reply to post by Xcathdra


Xchathdra, you wouldn't know truth if it slapped you in the face

You're not fooling anyone with that avatar by the way

Where's the naked truth on Ron Paul with his white supremicist closet?

reply to post by burntheships

What difference does it make?

Are you kidding? The background of any speaker is germane to the truth of his message. If only the Krauts would have asked the same of Goebels.
No, I am NOT comparing Goebels to the speaker. I am just saying that anyone can propagandize a point of view.

Originally posted by LifeIsPeculiar
reply to post by burntheships

 

What difference does it make?

Are you kidding? The background of any speaker is germane to the truth of his message. If only the Krauts would have asked the same of Goebels.
No, I am NOT comparing Goebels to the speaker. I am just saying that anyone can propagandize a point of view.

Cain says one thing when he talks with some people and the opposite when he talks to someone else...video is shown of him doing this.

That is not an opinion, it is not a point of view, it is the truth.

Thanks to OldCorp, the truth is viral...

...and he wins a fictional coffee mug for it!

Biblically speaking his last name says it all ....CAIN.


Remember Cain and Abel?

reply to post by SecondAmendmentUser


Is Abel a Democrat?

The biggest problem I have with Cain, isn't the fact that he wouldn't have appoint Muslims, the electric fence, or any of his stances on the issues, but the fact he flip flops. The American people really don't know where he stands or what he believes. If you are not sure about what his policies really are, how can you throw your support behind him? He is going to be at a event here in Montgomery on Friday and I'm really thinking about going and asking him flat out where he stands on these issues. He has already insulted "Paulites" by claiming at every one of these type events, we show up and question him about his FED comments he made when filling in for Neil Boortz. I'm so sick of the lying with these candidates.

This video was pretty pathetic. The parts dealing with the fed was even more pathetic. The rest was nothing more than one mans war against being "snubbed" by another man over not getting an interview. Childish shameful behavior.

Why is this opinion based fallacies being allowed and backed by ATS?

Almost every single candidate i see giving a speech, interview or answer a question; all i see is a complete and utter lack of confidence, and the only thing they are confident in is safe topics.

That being said, whenever i see Ron Paul speak, he is completely confident in what he says, if i never heard a word he said, i can tell just by his body language, his confidence and truthfulness.

Ron Paul is the only candidate not treating the 'race' as a game.

Wow, he flipped flopped a lot, it was hilarious to watch how he changed every statement he said.

reply to post by AboveTopSecret.com


I'm an Independent who is unhappy with everyone running for President. Having said that, I have a question on your view on something pertinent.

Being neither for or against Ron Paul, I do not believe a man with his views can defeat Obama. Since you are a Paul Supporter, does your support of Paul have any bearing on your work in this video? Do you think eliminating his opponents through video's like this will help him out and is that your motivation? If it does work out for Paul, do you honestly in your heart believe Paul can beat Obama?

Do you have a second choice other than Paul?

I have a little bit of prejudice in regards to Paul because he is a Libertarian and is not running as one. I can't help but view that as the same as the problems we are seeing in Alaska with Democrats running as Republicans. I see it as dishonest in a way.

Oddly enough I may end up voting for the actual Libertarian Candidate if that helps you understand my views. I don't believe any vote is wasted or that anyone should run as other than who they are.

Thanks for the interesting video. Well done.

reply to post by AboveTopSecret.com


I have to agree with Cain. There should be no Sharia Law creeping into the WH. As long as a muslim completely supports the Constitution, then fine. I have my doubts about whether any muslim truly would put the Constitution first, due to the type of religious outlook they have been shown to have. We, who are religious may say God first, but there should be absolutely no overruling the Constitution. We have plenty of Constitutional laws on the books to keep things running without the added stuff of Sharia. Sharia and Constitution are NOT compatible. When people insist it will be fine, I think they are naive at best, or lying.

Originally posted by masqua
I simply asked if you would also support a candidate who would deny Christians within his administration because I'd like to know if you consider one divergent facet of the Judaic faith less favourable than the other.

I already answered your superficial questions. You care more in exposing what you perceive as bigoted viewpoints, than you do in exploring the context of Cain's statement. A more intelligent line of inquiry may of been why does Cain refuse to have Muslims in his administration.

I am particularly impressed with how he stuck to his guns on this. I think the Cain campaign made the right decision in not organizing an interview with yet another PC attack dog.

Originally posted by wardk28
The biggest problem I have with Cain, isn't the fact that he wouldn't have appoint Muslims, the electric fence, or any of his stances on the issues, but the fact he flip flops. The American people really don't know where he stands or what he believes. If you are not sure about what his policies really are, how can you throw your support behind him? He is going to be at a event here in Montgomery on Friday and I'm really thinking about going and asking him flat out where he stands on these issues. He has already insulted "Paulites" by claiming at every one of these type events, we show up and question him about his FED comments he made when filling in for Neil Boortz. I'm so sick of the lying with these candidates.

Clarification: He said he wouldn't be comfortable unless the person was completely loyal to the Constitution. Of course that is difficult to know for sure, as I believe that Obama is not and never was loyal to the Constitution, or the USA for that matter. Obama may or may not be muslim. He has no business running this country, but that is who got elected, who was nominated by operatives of the DSA.
This is not about not liking muslim, it is about protecting the Sovereignty and the Constitution.
I support Ron Paul, but I will not twist myself into pretzel shapes to unfairly criticize another candidate. His relationship to the Fed is what concerns me about Cain. Also, I am just not sure about his tax program.

reply to post by burntheships


errr ya kidden right.... i would think that when reading/watching/listening (to) political you have to consider... well - political. Point of view is just one aspect of considering political. just plain sense, right?.

reply to post by Jason88


Sorry, that is not fascist, it is free enterprise. Know the difference. Socialism and communism destroy free enterprise. I've been seeing a lot of people here lately throwing around that term and it seems a lot since the OWS started.

Originally posted by LifeIsPeculiar
reply to post by burntheships

 

What difference does it make?

Are you kidding?

No.

I am just saying that anyone can propagandize a point of view.

Ummm....exactly my point. What differerence does party affiliation amount to these days.

reply to post by wbf850


Can you spell Globalist? (aka known in old school as NWO)

What if each side (those in each party in key postitions) has made a deal with the
Globalists, and they have an agenda to carry out, including but not limited to shaping elections?