It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by StumpDrummer
reply to post by objectivist
I wonder how much was not sunken!! over time natural buildup of sediments will occur somewhere around 3 inches every 100 yrs or so ive heard
but that is a very cool pice maybe they will dig up the rest so we can see the rest of the carvings and decorations on them
Originally posted by Druid42
Easter Island's latitude is close to that of Caldera, Chile, and it lies 3,510 km (2,180 mi) west of continental Chile at its nearest point (between Lota and Lebu).
Source.
So you have an Island, named Rapa Nui, almost 2,200 miles from the nearest coast. They build statues. WHY? Mostly all the statues face toward the sea. WHY?
Did the settlers of that remote island build the tech to create the statues on their own, or maybe there was a vast sea-faring society back in the day? Who was population zero?
Why would you build such statues if you lived on a remote island isolated from everyone? What is the meaning?
Too many questions. Fascinating subject. SnF.
"Beware the beast man, for he is the Devil's pawn. Alone among God's primates, he kills for sport or lust or greed. Yea, he will murder his brother to possess his brother's land. Let him not breed in great numbers, for he will make a desert of his home and yours. Shun him, for he is the harbinger of death."
Each totem was different to immortalise a particular chief, halfway between the living and the gods. With their backs to the sea they could inspire and protect the Islanders.
There, carvings in the stones from just after the catastrophe show a birdman.
Originally posted by Asktheanimals
Originally posted by StumpDrummer
reply to post by objectivist
You're absolutely right, these statues were never buried that deeply and the rate of sediment accumulation on Easter island is much faster than 3 inches per hundred years. Dust from central Asia along with blowout from volcanic eruptions adds soil at a rate of closer to 3 feet per hundred years. What we are looking at may be no more than 500 years of accumulated soil build-up.
Originally posted by Wolfenz
Originally posted by spikey
reply to post by bottleslingguy
then the "giants" must have had proportionately very small penises to be that tall (50'? 60'?) but still sexually compatible with human women
And how does a human female gestate and give birth to a giant baby, around the size of a small cow?
The penis/vagina thing is true too. The only other way to have produced these 'nephilim' hybrids would have been in-vitro / test tube / genetic manipulation. Which brings us full circle back to ET (of whatever species) being the originators of our current human species...whatever their reasons were.
Originally posted by JibbyJedi
I agree that the level to which they are buried must have taken 1000s of years, so many thing were built so well and extremely large 1000s of years ago.... what are we doing wrong in the 21 century that we can't make a car run more than 25-30 years tops?
Originally posted by charlyv
After they consumed all of the trees, the society was in horrible trouble.
Nothing to make boats from to get outa there.
Perhaps they put the red hats on the statues in hope of someone/something noticing them, with hopes that they could be rescued from such a barren place.
Originally posted by muzzleflash
Originally posted by charlyv
After they consumed all of the trees, the society was in horrible trouble.
Nothing to make boats from to get outa there.
Perhaps they put the red hats on the statues in hope of someone/something noticing them, with hopes that they could be rescued from such a barren place.
I honestly don't think anyone smart enough to build these statues would also at the same time, be dumb enough to think that putting a hat on it would help others rescue them, considering there are thousands of miles of ocean in every direction.
It seems totally unrealistic. There had to be other reasons, perhaps simple ones.
But 'sending a S.O.S' doesn't seem to be a viable solution.
Originally posted by muzzleflash
Originally posted by charlyv
After they consumed all of the trees, the society was in horrible trouble.
Nothing to make boats from to get outa there.
Perhaps they put the red hats on the statues in hope of someone/something noticing them, with hopes that they could be rescued from such a barren place.
I honestly don't think anyone smart enough to build these statues would also at the same time, be dumb enough to think that putting a hat on it would help others rescue them, considering there are thousands of miles of ocean in every direction.
It seems totally unrealistic. There had to be other reasons, perhaps simple ones.
But 'sending a S.O.S' doesn't seem to be a viable solution.
"Rano Kau is a 324 0 tall extinct volcano that forms the southwestern headland of Easter Island, a Chilean island in the Pacific Ocean; it was formed of basaltic lava flows in the Pleistocene with its youngest rocks dated at between 150,000 and 210,000 years ago"