It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by AussieAmandaC
Originally posted by steveknows
Originally posted by AussieAmandaC
reply to post by steveknows
Actually I said labour-hating household.....
...
I'm still waiting for you to critique the rest of my post...
while we wait...
sorry...what government took us to places where we should never have been in the interests of brown nosing the wrong country for their own self interest?
Your response reminds me of parliament time.
True you did. My bad. but you'll be stung by Gillard you'll see. Oh you mention parliment time. Did you see Gillard and her perty walk out of Q&A because they didn't like the questions they were being asked? You should have it was all over the news. Who walks out of Q&A? A party which believes it's not answerable that who.
Also in regards to brown nosing it's called an alliance which is a good thing to have when you're a 1st world English speaking country surrounded by poor countries who don't like you. Anyone who's served in the defence force can explain that one.
edit on 20-10-2011 by steveknows because: Typo
Actually no I didn't (I was probably cleaning up after my four children), not that it matters much, most sessions sound the same. Back and forth with school yard taunts, all bluster and no back up.
Did you watch her ON Q&A? She held herself remarkable well in a room full of haters and quite frankly it impressed the pants of me. She has more balls than most.
Alliances wouldn't be necessary if modern man was not so engrossed in taking everything they could lay their hands on at the expense of others, and yes I can see how that kind of thinking would be drilled into you.
Don't turn this into an attack of defense force people it's not necessary.
Originally posted by InfaRedMan
There's nothing wrong with the idea of social security. It's just the way it's implemented here which is awful. Too many long time dole bludgers who have no inclination to work and bogin chicks popping out heaps of kids to live on child support. Social security needs to toughen up with a decent reform.
IRM
Originally posted by Raivan31
reply to post by surrealist
Well you may be in a good position to comment on my overview of the stream system. Obviously i don't have inside information, i've had to glean what i could from anecdotal reports. How accurate was i in my appraisal?
Also, how often were you given the excuse when applying for a job that you were "over qualified?"
I wish there was something i could do to bring the issue's relating to Social security to the public eye and change the public perception of the 'Dole Bludger' or at the very least help them to understand the difference between a bludger and a genuine job-seeker.
Originally posted by steveknows
Originally posted by AussieAmandaC
Originally posted by steveknows
Originally posted by AussieAmandaC
reply to post by steveknows
Actually I said labour-hating household.....
...
I'm still waiting for you to critique the rest of my post...
while we wait...
sorry...what government took us to places where we should never have been in the interests of brown nosing the wrong country for their own self interest?
Your response reminds me of parliament time.
True you did. My bad. but you'll be stung by Gillard you'll see. Oh you mention parliment time. Did you see Gillard and her perty walk out of Q&A because they didn't like the questions they were being asked? You should have it was all over the news. Who walks out of Q&A? A party which believes it's not answerable that who.
Also in regards to brown nosing it's called an alliance which is a good thing to have when you're a 1st world English speaking country surrounded by poor countries who don't like you. Anyone who's served in the defence force can explain that one.
edit on 20-10-2011 by steveknows because: Typo
Actually no I didn't (I was probably cleaning up after my four children), not that it matters much, most sessions sound the same. Back and forth with school yard taunts, all bluster and no back up.
Did you watch her ON Q&A? She held herself remarkable well in a room full of haters and quite frankly it impressed the pants of me. She has more balls than most.
Alliances wouldn't be necessary if modern man was not so engrossed in taking everything they could lay their hands on at the expense of others, and yes I can see how that kind of thinking would be drilled into you.
Don't turn this into an attack of defense force people it's not necessary.
Actually no. A serviceman er sorry person, actually has to be capable if independent thought. Must have the ability to orginise and think for yourself.
How have I turned it into an attack on the defence force? I've served in the defence force and I'm always the first to defend them and why the government does things if there's good reason.. You're the one who yapped on about the government taking us places we shouldn't have gone all for the sake of brown nosing. I just explained why it happened so that you'd be less ignorent. Whipping a dead horse I'd say.
Also these days I work for community services and you're wrong on so many levels
The truth is that most of the disadvantaged do want to help themselves. And it's this stereotypical thinking I'm seeing from the naysayers that this creep in office is playing on to get support to hound the battler.
Just think of this. As of December a child who's battling cancer won't get free dental treatment because this great perfact lady in office has decided that EPC scheme is a drain on the system while at the same time she buys ciggarettes for boat people. Part of her plan to get a Job with the U.N when she's booted I think and she doesn't care how many billions she has to spend overseas to get it or how many billions she cuts back on Australians.
You make no sense. No more debate with you.edit on 20-10-2011 by steveknows because: Typo