Originally posted by squandered
I think you'll find that people who work hard and get a good education will hit a glass ceiling if they encounter Jews. You will never get good marks
in a law degree, or get a good banking job if you're not a Jew and that's just the start.
That's just not at all true in my experience, and I worked in Hollywood for three years. The interest was in finding people who were capable, not
who was Jewish and capable. I had bosses, one the head of a studio I directly worked for (United Artists), and other high level acquaintances in that
industry who were not Jewish. These were executives, producers who had their own companies, top agents and such -- if you had the talent to do the
work, people would hire you. Goodness, the former head of Time-Warner, the largest most powerful media company on planet Earth was black,
Dick Parsons.
That's not to say it's not easy to get hired in Hollywood, Jewish or not. It took me 6 months to get my first good, non-temp job out in Hollywood
and I had to fight for it. Being Jewish didn't matter, nobody asked me what my religion was and most of the people I interviewed with with for jobs
weren't Jewish, either. It wasn't easy, and I even had experience in the industry working in New York before that and two very well connected
people helping me get me interviews. In fact, my biggest obstacles were a) I was new to Los Angeles, so missed out on jobs because that is a big
drawback in an assistant -- you had to know where things were for setting appointments and lunches and such, and b) the fact that I wasn't a good
looking girl, instead I was a fairly average looking man. Male executives wanted a hot young assistant, female ones never seemed to be comfortable
with male assistants and so tended to only want female ones. I was flatly told on half a dozen occasions that they were only looking to hire a woman
for such and such an assistant position and so never even got to interview.
As for law and banking, again, I now live in New York (again), I know a LOT of lawyers and have known/met a few banker-types. Some are Jewish, but
many of the more successful ones are not. Your grades in law school or business school don't depend on being Jewish. The CEO of CitiGroup is
from India. The head of
American
Express is black. My aforementioned friend works for Cravath, Swain & Moore, arguably one of the top if not the top firm in New York, perhaps
the world. Check out their
list of partners, are there
Jews in the bunch, sure, are they anywhere near a majority? Not even close.
I've never known a Jews to date a non-Jew. They always gang up and they're just basically snobs.
Then you really don't know too many Jews, do you? I've dated exactly two Jewish women in my life, well, I've hooked up with two Jewish women. All
the ones I've actually dated have been non-Jews, and so have most of the girls I've just hooked up with. One of my Jewish friends is recently
divorced from his Korean wife and at 41 is dating the first Jewish girl he's ever been with. Actually, one of the real current trends people have
noted and I've even heard jokes about are how many Jewish men are dating and marrying Asian women. Why? I don't know, but it's REALLY common in
recent years. The girl I'm currently kind of in love with is Chinese. Sadly, she's got a boyfriend...who is, you guess it, Jewish.
Originally posted by squandered
That wasn't a crazy circular argument. It was a nonsensical situation / farcical. If I hate Jews or some aspect (and I do, but that's an aside) I'm
not going to play semantics to diffuse whatever it is I have a gripe about. It makes no sense on that level. On the other hand it makes perfect sense
to make that claim as a victim when you pre-suppose what others think. In essence the description reads to me like some Jew making excuses for
ignoring what non-jews think.
I didn't say it was logical, but you shouldn't look for logic from people who act out of hate and fear. You are the one who seems to be
presupposing things about how Jews think, the other poster is basing his account (presumably) on what he's encountered. It rang true to me because
I've encountered the same sort of thing. It's not an assumption, it's something that I've seen and had to deal with. The only presupposition
here is on your part about the motives of a group you whose shoes you never lived in.
I agree, it is bizarre and a nonsensical situation and frankly very frustrating to get into an argument like that because there can never be a
resolution to it. That doesn't change the fact that it does indeed happen.