It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I'm not sure what you mean other than maybe you do think Google Earth is completely honest, nothing ever changes in the universe outside of our limited and dated knowledge (there are no other planets, no new meteors or asteroids, everything is predictable), and maybe even you think that contemplating something you don't agree with is blasphemy.
Originally posted by LaughingatHumanity
reply to post by busterbunni
What exactly does that concept have to do with an amateur sky watchers piece of software? You keep grasping at straws. The known objects in the sky change daily, amateur and professional astronomers alike make new discoveries daily.
How relevant are such discoveries or objects no amateur would ever see to such a piece of free software. How realistic would it be to incorporate such a mass into a piece of free amateur software.
You are convincing me you are devoid of simple reason and should be left to ponder the inane without attempts at clarity.
Originally posted by DJW001
reply to post by busterbunni
I'm not sure what you mean other than maybe you do think Google Earth is completely honest, nothing ever changes in the universe outside of our limited and dated knowledge (there are no other planets, no new meteors or asteroids, everything is predictable), and maybe even you think that contemplating something you don't agree with is blasphemy.
I don't understand your objection or your comparison. Neither GoogleEarth nor Stellarium is anything more than a map. They only contain the information programmed into their databases. Stellarium can calculate the positions of various objects as seen from different locations at different moments in time. GoogleEarth can locate any point on Earth and provide images of various degrees of magnification at a single moment in time. There are no buildings visible on GoogleEarth that were not yet built when Google's last overflight recorded the images they are using for that location. Stellarium does not show newly discovered objects until you program their ephemerides into the database yourself.
The reason why people suggest using Stellarium if you see a bright light in the sky is because, nine times out of ten, if it's not an airplane, it's probably something already in the Stellarium database, allowing you to identify it. If you use Stellarium and it's not already there, you have discovered something new. Stellarium is a useful tool if you understand what it is for.
Edit to add: I like to use screenshots from Sky View Cafe in posts because of their simple graphic style. It makes the identification much more easily comprehended.edit on 15-10-2011 by DJW001 because: (no reason given)
Because they just have to look up.
Originally posted by busterbunni
If you aren't even allowed to see everything that is on our planets surface why do people believe they would be allowed to see everything that is outside of our atmosphere?
Originally posted by busterbunni
Try asking anyone on here a question about the stars and see how many times people respond with check Stellarium...
I don't believe my point of view is the only legitimate one, I also don't believe everything other people tell me to.
Originally posted by Chamberf=6
reply to post by busterbunni
Ok we get it. You dislike Stellarium. What do you use? Why (if you use Anything) is it better?
How can you "trust" the info you use? Couldn't it be part of a gigantic worldwide conspiracy too? And all those amateur astronomers and star gazers around the world? -- All conspiring to feed You false info, right?
:shk:edit on 10/15/2011 by Chamberf=6 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Nobama
reply to post by busterbunni
Again...what? Where have people attacked you? I can see a little bit of trolling but no attacks..
I don't "trust" any specific source,