'No Food Rights' Judge quits to work for Monsanto law firm

..... and lo, did the Judge abase himself before the Great God Greenback ...



We all know it goes on, and that`s galling enough! But when they pee up your back and tell you it`s raining .... well that really sucks!

reply to post by agentofchaos


The majority of Monsanto stock is held by hedge funds and those are mostly in trusts for the government pension funds and such so there is no way to divest these planet raping scum.

First, the judge ruled that the plaintiffs owned a farm and that the farm had to follow the Wisconsin laws regulating farms. That should be non-controversial. This was the second time the judge had to explain it to the plaintiffs..He did not say that plaintiffs didn't have a right to do any of the things you're listing, he said there was no "fundamental" right. That word is important because it has a specific constitutional meaning. It determines whether "strict scrutiny" needs to be applied to the law. Of course the judge did not rule that we have no right to own a cow. I'm surprised you feel for that.

Second, Axley Brynelson is one of Wisconsin's largest and most famous law firms. It's over 125 years old and has probably defended everybody at one time or another. With 18 years as a judge, its not surprising or suspicious that Fiedler would work there.

Sure, its a conspiracy website, but you should have some facts to build the theory on.

Are you freaking kidding me? He should be hanged for treason! What the heck is going on? We have deep corruption on all three branches of government - Executive, Legislative and Judicial. IMO power needs to be focused on the local with citizen participation which is the only way to resolve this problem. Federal power needs to be weakened as soon as possible and state rights need to hold more sway. Man I am pissed

I'm telling ya, the world would have been better off under the Nazi's.

Atleast they valued a clean environment and food.

reply to post by charles1952


It is my opinion that the judge was splitting hairs when he said that they had not developed their case enough to satisfy the court that there is a fundamental human right to consume the food that you choose. Court Document

He could have ruled on the side of the farmers but seems to have chosen very obscure reasons why they have no fundamental right to do with their property and their bodies as they see fit. He chose to obfuscate in my opinion so that he was protecting the state's law from a constitutional confrontation. He was trying to word his judgement to avoid a constitutional challenge on appeal. It is word craft sophistry in my view.

reply to post by wayouttheredude

Dear wayouttheredude,

Thanks for your thoughtful reply, it makes sense as a reasonable and plausible argument. I don't know yet whether I agree with it or not, but it is vastly superior to the other posters' positions that the judge committed treason and should be hanged, or that he is completely corrupt.

Hats off to you for being reasonable.

With respect,
Charles1952

reply to post by PapaEmeritus

The whore judge was already been paid by mosanto before the court decision, expect more cases against the rights to people to chose what to eat and what alternative treatment to take, coming out with decisions like the one the whore judge took because that is what money and power does, it buys whores with promises of jobs after passing the laws in favor of the ones making the payments and promises.

This is my opinion after seen the outcome after the whore judge decision.He got rewarded

Guess what people it is happening within our government and has been happening for a long time, so do not expect any elected officials to step down for the people's rights when it comes to mospantos dirty business

This is going to get worst as time goes by and we just seat here and complain about it.

I avoid eating any of monspanto crap and poisons anyway I can they are right now on everything you buy in regular chain food stores.

reply to post by wayouttheredude



People are starting to see that $$ buys more than I-pods...and I-pads...it also buys I-nfluence. It buys I-judges and I-laws and I-regulations. It buys things it shouldn't buy but it does and it ALWAYS HAS...its just recently becomming more and more obvious. Not only becaue some are paying more attention (such as the OP) but because TPTB care less and less about concealing/hiding it. Which is concerning because its a very bold move and bold moves are made when you know you have the upper-hand.

Good Catch OP

I'm baffled by the idea the judge was bribed to throw this case. There's no evidence for it. Monsanto had nothing to do with this case. Genetically modified food had nothing to do with this case.

There is nothing unreasonable about a judge, after 18 years on the bench, going to work for one of the oldest, largest, and best known firms in the state.

I really don't understand why there is such furor over this. Will someone explain it to me using facts instead of allegations without evidence?

Be very afraid people, because even in our supreme court Monspanto have their pundits already embedded, Judge whore Clarence Thomas is an ex Monspanto lawyer.

Corporate pimps has been able to get their minions everywhere form government, judicial system and their money goes a long away around from local politics to Washington politics.

www.celsias.com...

The corporate pimps are like a virus a fungus that is spreading all over and infecting everything just likeeverything they touch with their dirty money.

Originally posted by charles1952
I'm baffled by the idea the judge was bribed to throw this case. There's no evidence for it. Monsanto had nothing to do with this case. Genetically modified food had nothing to do with this case.

There is nothing unreasonable about a judge, after 18 years on the bench, going to work for one of the oldest, largest, and best known firms in the state.

I really don't understand why there is such furor over this. Will someone explain it to me using facts instead of allegations without evidence?

Wow really? I am really starting to believe that there are paid info agents on this forum (which I thought was a far fetched idea before). You can't be serious?

Originally posted by marg6043
Be very afraid people, because even in our supreme court Monspanto have their pundits already embedded, Judge whore Clarence Thomas is an ex Monspanto lawyer.

He worked for Monsanto for three years OVER 30 YEARS AGO.

I truly don't understand you. The case was decided last year on a 7 - 1 vote. Monsanto doesn't own the Court. Please listen. A lower court said Monsanto shouldn't have gotten a go ahead without filing an Environmental Impact Statement. The Supreme Court AGREED. The lower court issued a PERMANENT injunction against Monsanto. The Supreme Court said we can solve this without going as far as a permanent injunction, that's all.
It was no big deal.

reply to post by Chewingonmushrooms


That is so funny, with all the years I and you have in this boards it doesn't stop to amazed me that it is a possibility after reading some post.

reply to post by Chewingonmushrooms


You asked "You can't be serious?" Let's assume for a minute that I was serious. Do you disagree with my points? On what evidence do you base your disagreement?

Guys ... this is why you own weapons.

If they actually try to enforce anything that he ruled in that case .... you get your gun out. You pull the trigger.
Problem solved.

Im a firm believer in weapons , and i believe its one of the reasons our founders gave us the right to maintain arms.

It keeps the government in check ... if we need to check them.

And if the Government tells me i can not eat or drink a substance that i have purchased or bardered for (that is within reason and legal) , then you start shooting as in the days of revolution , however , you cant just sit out in a field and hope they wont see you , you have to hit them hard and fast , thermal is a horrible tool when its being used against you ... hard to hide and they can kill you from miles away and you wont know what hit you.

reply to post by milkyway12


I agree that owning weapons is helpful in protecting us against governmental tyranny. Its a great idea. But its not necessary here.

The judge said, basically, "You call yourself a farm, you act like a farm, there's nothing in the US Constitution that lets you off from obeying Wisconsin's laws concerning farms."

Many of the posts in this thread have been blowing things out of proportion and misunderstanding what happened.

do not have the right?

weve been doing it for hundreads if not thousands of years...