Here is who's behind occupy wall street

Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
reply to post by TinfoilTP

 

It's definitely globalist but with overtones of anarchism and collectivism both.

Anarchism, collectivism, socialism, all acceptable tools to use for the Globalists to attack their only roadblock, Capitalism.

The Ruckus Society is also a part of this. They are professional protestors and go for a number of issues. Ruckus is funded by Tides which is a Soros front.

I can see you're buying into the hate machine of the political right.

Why does the right hate Soros?

As a public charity, Tides is not owned by Soros, nor was it started by him. Soros is the founder and chairman of the Open Society Institute. It is just one of hundreds of funders that partner with Tides in programs to promote economic justice, democratic processes and human rights.

The Open Society funds are only a small percentage of Tides’ total contributions — far less than 5 percent of our $112 million total in 2009.

amazing to see the sheer number of traitors growing on ATS

Good job guys for helping the Gov grabbing protesters


you disgust me

Originally posted by TinfoilTP

Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
reply to post by TinfoilTP

 

It's definitely globalist but with overtones of anarchism and collectivism both.

Anarchism, collectivism, socialism, all acceptable tools to use for the Globalists to attack their only roadblock, Capitalism.

Absolutely correct!

Well done.

Originally posted by Blackmarketeer

The Ruckus Society is also a part of this. They are professional protestors and go for a number of issues. Ruckus is funded by Tides which is a Soros front.

I can see you're buying into the hate machine of the political right.

Why does the right hate Soros?

As a public charity, Tides is not owned by Soros, nor was it started by him. Soros is the founder and chairman of the Open Society Institute. It is just one of hundreds of funders that partner with Tides in programs to promote economic justice, democratic processes and human rights.

The Open Society funds are only a small percentage of Tides’ total contributions — far less than 5 percent of our $112 million total in 2009.

Tides Foundation/ Center. Wonderful bunch of folks. Nothing here to see folks, move along.

activistcash.com...

Set up in 1976 by California activist Drummond Pike, Tides does two things better than any other foundation or charity in the U.S. today: it routinely obscures the sources of its tax-exempt millions, and makes it difficult (if not impossible) to discern how the funds are actually being used.

In practice, “Tides” behaves less like a philanthropy than a money-laundering enterprise (apologies to Procter & Gamble), taking money from other foundations and spending it as the donor requires. Called donor-advised giving, this pass-through funding vehicle provides public-relations insulation for the money’s original donors. By using Tides to funnel its capital, a large public charity can indirectly fund a project with which it would prefer not to be directly identified in public. Drummond Pike has reinforced this view, telling The Chronicle of Philanthropy: “Anonymity is very important to most of the people we work with.”

In order to get an idea of the massive scale on which the Tides Foundation plays its shell game, consider that Tides has collected over $200 million since 1997, most of it from other foundations. The list of grantees who eventually received these funds includes many of the most notorious anti-consumer groups in U.S. history: Greenpeace, the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC), Environmental Media Services, Environmental Working Group, and even fringe groups like the now-defunct Mothers & Others for a Livable Planet (which used actress Meryl Streep to “front” the 1989 Alar-on-apples health scare fraud for NRDC).

For corporations and other organizations that eventually find themselves in these grantees’ crosshairs, there is practically no way to find out where their money originated. For the general public, the money trail ends at Tides’ front door. In many cases, even the eventual recipient of the funding has no idea how Tides got it in the first place.

Remarkably, all of this appears to be perfectly legal. The IRS has traditionally been friendly toward this “donor-advised” giving model, because in theory it allows people who don’t have millions of dollars to use an existing philanthropy as a “fiscal sponsor.” This allows them to distribute their money to worthwhile charities, while avoiding the overhead expenses of setting up a whole new foundation.

Why would they want to mask their backers? hmm.

Van Jones also?

If you lie with dogs......

www.aim.org...

When the list of donors to the Van Jones “Green for All” organization is examined, one name stands out-the Open Society Institute of billionaire George Soros. The Green for All 2008 annual report is also notable for the pictures of the powerful people who associated with Jones. They include House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and former Vice President Al Gore.

While the Open Society Institute was supporting Green for All in 2008, when Jones was running it, the Soros-funded organization was financially underwriting the Ella Baker Center for Human Rights when Jones was in charge of that group. The Open Society Institute gave the Ella Baker Center $151,800 in 2006 and $140,000 in 2007. Jones ran this group during the years 1996-2007. He then emerged as a senior fellow at the Soros-funded Center for American Progress.

Soros is not merely a "philanthropist".

Just because you donate money, it doesnt mean your a great person. It just means you have money.

maybe (since he's so uber rich), the protesters need to add him to the list?