"Occupy Wallstreet," the Communists in sheeps clothing.

reply to post by jimbo999


lol. You see that little line between the equal sing? It means 'doesnt equal'.

lol

Yeah, I don't get people being so anti socialism. It's about helping everyone you can and as far as Im concerned no one is free until everyone is free. Here's some beast 1333 lyrics which talk about how the old baby boomers are to brainwashed to even listen.

Global satellite communications will go down followed by the electricity all over town sound, will be used as weapons in a gun "sarge theirs a large crowd!" "set them to stun!"
Im done with all the older folks dismissing this as madness, the children are the only ones who listen in their sadness. Full spectrum dominance totalitarian obelisk William Cooper was assassinated yes the novelist. Annihalational mystic insisting co-existing laws are the sanctions and the sanctions we lifting im beasting, but only cause the rich are feasting its gonna be to late before ya'll people feel the bee sting. Whats happening i had an urgent sense to rap again and haliburton employees should all be lynched for trafficking.

Peace Out

Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus

Originally posted by ModestMike
This Protest is NOT ABOUT Communism, are you kidding me? Are you guys saying you honestly enjoy how our Government is being run? We will Bail banks but Not give to our community nearly the amount of money that is needed? How many monopolies are going on right now in the business market? How many new jobs have been created? And you think this is about Communism? This protest is about Waking UP! They are trying to reach the big masses. So ! Please do so! I know you can and have the capabilities.

I am not, and never was for the baillouts. My issue is with the organizers. I think probably a lot of the protesters are sincere and I dont' blame then for being angry at the Big Dogs. I don't care to have my tax dollars go to give some big fund manager a huge bonus. But then why aren't these people on Obama's doorstep with this? oh, right because they blame Bush....and yet....Obama was for the baillout before he was POTUS.

Actually Bush began the bailouts. Remember? Obama simply continued the policy the Bush admin had already put into motion. This "Communist" BS is just a red herring - that plays right into the hands of the powers that be. They must be really overjoyed with people still confusing genuine protest with some imaginary bogeyman that originated in the fertile imagination of a 1950's era madman called McCarthy.

Originally posted by ARealandTrueAmerican
reply to post by jimbo999

 

lol. You see that little line between the equal sing? It means 'doesnt equal'.

lol

An education is a wonderful thing...

2nd

Originally posted by jimbo999

Originally posted by Partisanity
reply to post by ThirdEyeofHorus

 

Socialists + Leftists =/= "commies"

Ermm...nope, it doesn't actually. Do you even know what the differences are? Ever been to a Socialist country? Ever been to a Communist country? I've been to both - and even lived in Socialist countries - and I can tell you, there is very little if any similarity at all...

"=/=" means DOES NOT EQUAL.

Originally posted by SourGrapes
reply to post by TsukiLunar

 

You mentioned 'communal living' as being communist. What about 'communal dieing'? It is relevant, no? Well, since over 100 million people have been murdered in the name of 'Communism' in the twentienth century alone, I suppose your view may change, if you happened to end up in the 'wrong' community. Perhaps all of those who lost their lives, due to communist leaders: Stalin, Mao,and Rouge were free to choose their 'communal' death beds. (BTW, have you read any of the witness statements of how babies and other young 'communal' were put down? Read about it sometime. Make a game of it, 'they' did.)

I feel like some youngsters have the misconception that communism is a grand social party that just throws their daily earnings into one big pot and live happily together. Sadly, the most common shared 'pot' is in no way monetary, rather it's a melting urn of death, sorrow, fear, and disease.

The ONLY happy communists are the commie LEADERS, which is exactly why they will throw every penny they have into fooling the youth into it's fantasia. It's more like the carnival Pinochio was lead to, only with much dyer consequences. Capitalism is death to commie wanna-be-leaders, wihich is why they will stop short of death to destroy it's lively-hood.

BTW, you pick China as an example of current Commie success stories? Really? Let's see if you feel the same way, after a vacation to the country. How many dead female newborns willl you step over before you change your mind?

edit on 27-9-2011 by SourGrapes because: so many spelling a grammar errors. ARGH it's late!

Question. How many have died in the name of Capitalism? How many atomic bombs have communists dropped on populated cities?

Originally posted by ARealandTrueAmerican
reply to post by Section31

 

So now you care claiming that anyone even mildly to the left of center is a Communist?

Deadman's Advocate:
I am not a Democrat, nor am I a Republican. I am an undeclared voter.

Personally, I don't care if the Republicans and Democrats kill each other. Once they weaken themselves enough, from fighting each other, I will support a constitutionalist movement to take the country back.

maybe the last post in this wins, lets all compete till we die----

reply to post by Section31


And what are your views on "centralism"?

You realize that "centralism" is what every government movement claims to be pushing for by checking the left with the right..?

www.youtube.com...

idk how to embedd things still. Im not sure if anyone has seen this video but this video makes me do this number here

reply to post by Section31


One problem Americas governmetn is not run by Democrats or Republicans is run by Goldman Sach and JP Morgan.

Originally posted by dn4cer2000
Question. How many have died in the name of Capitalism? How many atomic bombs have communists dropped on populated cities?

Relay your question to any of the countries that the US has "democracized" and take a look at their civillian casualty rates if you want to bolster your point.

Originally posted by The_Zomar
Theres people here that ACTUALLY think that the protestors in NYC are .....communist? I'd say thats one of the more unique claims I've seen in the last week, and I even went to the cryptozoology forum a couple days ago.

A leaderless movement, with no certain objective in mind (They meet there because theres a general distaste in the government.) somehow are communists.

They are anything but leaderless.
This was planned months in advance. Funding was obtained and managed.
The trick they like to use is for you to never see their face.
They want to fool you into thinking you are the main focal point of the movement, the tip of the spear, leaderless and empowered by your own actions. When really you are just a meat puppet on the street as they sit back behind a vast network of orgs and foundations safe and secure where the real empowerment is at.
Their only power is that they can organize more and do it all over again, the individuals who show up mean nothing, they can't even organize their text messages.

yeah i saw the video on another post, i guess their faster, competing sucks, someone has to loss.....

Originally posted by marg6043
reply to post by Section31

 

One problem Americas governmetn is not run by Democrats or Republicans is run by Goldman Sach and JP Morgan.

But it's so easy blaming Obama for everything bad that happens...

Originally posted by Daedal
reply to post by jimbo999

 

That would be Democratic Socialism:
Source

Democratic socialism is a description used by various socialist movements and organizations to emphasize the democratic character of their political orientation. Democratic socialism is contrasted with political movements that resort to authoritarian means to achieve a transition to socialism, instead advocating for the immediate creation of decentralized economic democracy from the grassroots level, undertaken by and for the working class itself. Specifically, it is a term used to distinguish between socialists who favor a grassroots-level, spontaneous revolution or Gradualism over Leninism – organized revolution instigated and directed by an overarching Vanguard party that operates on the basis of democratic centralism.

You conveniently left out the next paragraph:

Democratic socialism is difficult to define, and groups of scholars have radically different definitions for the term. Some definitions simply refer to all forms of socialism that follow an electoral, reformist or evolutionary path to socialism, rather than a revolutionary one.[2] Often, this definition is invoked to distinguish democratic socialism from communism, as in Donald Busky's Democratic Socialism: A Global Survey,[3] Jim Tomlinson's Democratic Socialism and Economic Policy: The Attlee Years, 1945-1951, Norman Thomas Democratic Socialism: a new appraisal or Roy Hattersley's Choose Freedom: The Future of Democratic Socialism. But for those who use the term in this way, the scope of the term "socialism" itself can be very vague, and include forms of socialism compatible with capitalism. For example, Robert M. Page, a Reader in Democratic Socialism and Social Policy at the University of Birmingham, writes about "transformative democratic socialism" to refer to the politics of the Clement Attlee government (a strong welfare state, fiscal redistribution, some nationalisation) and "revisionist democratic socialism", as developed by Anthony Crosland and Harold Wilson:

Naughty, naughty... modern day Socialism has nothing to do with Communism....and hasn't for a nearly a century. In fact, in most Western countries, 'socialism' is considered very 'middle of the road', a fence sitting political stance that's very politically 'safe'..

Naughty, naughty... modern day Socialism has nothing to do with Communism....and hasn't for a nearly a century. In fact, in most Western countries, 'socialism' is considered very 'middle of the road', a fence sitting political stance that's very politically 'safe'..

yeah i agree, canada's like that, i live here and its more right than left. just enough welfare to keep the masses from revolting. when we had a postal stike, the only thing they delivered was our checks.

reply to post by Partisanity


Thats because most Americans are conditioned to believe that we have independent political parties, but trust me people are waking up from the political favoritism party slumber, is not such thing as two parties, our government is run by corporatist and the worst class, because they have managed to buy the whores we call politicians in our nation.

MSNBC is already comparing the pepper spray incident to the Rodney King beatings. Soon these kids will be fully indoctrinated into the Progressive movement. Instead of protesting against Wall Street, they will be used to protest against 'the racist' opposition to Obama.

"OccupyWallStreet's" new slogans will include "Yes We Can", "Hope & Change", and "Win the Future".

reply to post by jimbo999


You are right, socialism is very central on the political spectrum. Unfortunately anything that isn't hard right is a "slippery slope towards communism" to the zealots that still cling to institutions as blatantly oppressive as the tea party.