It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
This move by anonymous has the very real potential to backfire on them, badly. Publishing a cop's home address most likely won't get the cop hurt. If attacking the cop was what someone was after, they know exactly where he'll be. He's a cop after all He has a very predictable and assigned area with times to expect him. However, someone who wouldn't have the guts to attack the cop directly might well go for a wife and/or kids.
I hope this doesn't end badly for the family of this Cop. If it does....Anonymous will have crossed a line with me and millions more like me. You don't put a bulls eye on the FAMILY of the person you want to target for something. That may sound old fashioned to some, and to be totally honest here, I grew up as the son of a Cop so my view is hardly without bias...but some lines have been respected by even the worst of organized crime. Why can't Anonymous show some class too? Oh well...
Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
This move by anonymous has the very real potential to backfire on them, badly. Publishing a cop's home address most likely won't get the cop hurt. If attacking the cop was what someone was after, they know exactly where he'll be. He's a cop after all He has a very predictable and assigned area with times to expect him. However, someone who wouldn't have the guts to attack the cop directly might well go for a wife and/or kids.
I hope this doesn't end badly for the family of this Cop. If it does....Anonymous will have crossed a line with me and millions more like me. You don't put a bulls eye on the FAMILY of the person you want to target for something. That may sound old fashioned to some, and to be totally honest here, I grew up as the son of a Cop so my view is hardly without bias...but some lines have been respected by even the worst of organized crime. Why can't Anonymous show some class too? Oh well...
Originally posted by kyred
reply to post by Wrabbit2000
Yeah, well, people who get arrested, whether guilty or not, often have their pictures and addresses printed in newspapers. What's so special about being a hired government thug, that the thug can't get the same treatment?
Originally posted by simplybill
I'm on the police officer's side. Those women were "testing the boundaries", and the NYPD showed them what the boundaries were. The officer did his duty to "protect and serve" the citizens of NYC. He made it clear that anarchy was not going to be allowed in NYC as it was in London a few weeks ago.
The anarchists' propanganda is trying to turn this around for their own benefit. Don't be fooled by their "peaceful protest" rhetoric. Anarchists crave destruction. They are angry because the NYPD are protecting the citizens and property of New York.
Originally posted by simplybill
I'm on the police officer's side. Those women were "testing the boundaries", and the NYPD showed them what the boundaries were. The officer did his duty to "protect and serve" the citizens of NYC. He made it clear that anarchy was not going to be allowed in NYC as it was in London a few weeks ago.
The anarchists' propanganda is trying to turn this around for their own benefit. Don't be fooled by their "peaceful protest" rhetoric. Anarchists crave destruction. They are angry because the NYPD are protecting the citizens and property of New York.
Originally posted by dashen
reply to post by simplybill
What anarchists? You mean this Hooligan?
They are benign as a buttercup and yet this Captain of all people rushes in a maces them and three or four cops
Originally posted by JudgeDeath
if they can't stand the heat they should've stayed in the kitchen,
or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances
The New York City police officer who activists say pepper-sprayed women during anti-Wall-Street protests Saturday is also being sued in connection with an incident during the 2004 demonstrations against the Republican National Convention.
Originally posted by narwahl
Originally posted by JudgeDeath
if they can't stand the heat they should've stayed in the kitchen,
or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances
First amendment.
They are not in a kitchen.
Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
Originally posted by simplybill
I'm on the police officer's side. Those women were "testing the boundaries", and the NYPD showed them what the boundaries were. The officer did his duty to "protect and serve" the citizens of NYC. He made it clear that anarchy was not going to be allowed in NYC as it was in London a few weeks ago.
The anarchists' propanganda is trying to turn this around for their own benefit. Don't be fooled by their "peaceful protest" rhetoric. Anarchists crave destruction. They are angry because the NYPD are protecting the citizens and property of New York.
Your wrong. Anarchists wear hoods and go around vandalising anything they can without an excuse.
The people we are talking about were peacefully protesting against the corruption of wall street, thus in no way deserving such treatment. And we are talking about a captain of the nypd who should know better and stay in his office doing paperwork.
The fact he was in the "front line" actively pursuing innocent women is disgraceful on his part
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
Aren't they using Mace now because Tasering got out of hand and people were talking about preggie women and ppl with heart condition were getting tased?