Lil video disproving all 911 conspiracies by PENN and TELLER

reply to post by Chesster


Honestly, if i ever saw a KKK member, i would probably knock him out. As a matter of fact, i've even written Rap songs, one of my favorite artists was Tupac, i'm a huge fan of Japan and their culture, and i smash racists on an intellectual level when i have the chance

So if i'm a racist, then we wouldn't really have a racism problem

And the reason i said to Look into the Logan act with bilderberg, is because if you HAD ACTUALLY DONE SO, you would see that it is a PROSECUTABLE offense to meet in secret, behind closed doors, with heads of other countries. You can be tried with Treason for doing so, but Rick Perry hasn't, Hillary clinton hasnt, bill clinton hasn't, obama hasn't, and neither has any other public official who has joined these meetings.

I could do this all day but i really don't want to, so i'm just going to close with this, as you put it so well.

Take off your blinders, the world is a great place but there are some screwed up people who don't care about anyone else running the show.

For your next homework assignment, look up Confessions of an Economic Hitman or World without Cancer by G. Edward Griffin.

Or, if you want, watch this video

reply to post by User8911


Where is proof on Rothchild?


I already know about Presscot... it's in history books and at the Library of Congress.

Anyhow... do you have any proof on the Rothchild thing from a credible source, I highly doubt they financed Nazis, but i could see it being a mistake, after all the European nations have always been intertwined since the roman empire. So there could have been indirect or direct financing but I am sure there was no direct awareness of the gravity of the situation.

Or perhaps there was, no clue but would love to see a credible source for this, and please no Alex jones or KKK white supremacy newsletters.

youtu.be...


reply to post by Lynexon


Thanks for video appreciated.


I saw Zeitgeist Adenendum which discussed the same thing

reply to post by EvanJP




You do know that the FBI and Media networs are two dif things right? One has no need or interest and would probably impeed investigations if it discloses anything, and the other needs ratings... I'll let you try to figure out which is which.

reply to post by Lynexon




Yes and if you fully understood the logan act you would realize what it is about, and that's to prevent presidents from doing back room deals with other officials from other gov since that would probably not be in Americas interest. But the Logan act says nothing about meeting in a group setting to discuss the philosophy and probably mostly private enterprise, corporations, and there impact on politics and vice versa.

Remember it's really not a meeting, Rick Perry even said they invited him once to give a talk about energy in texas, and never invited him back.


Basically it's just a lecture hall for those in power to learn more. Since there is no planning, and it is not secretive for many people from media to politicians are invited, it's just that if the doors were open to the ommon folk then nothing would be discussed for the future because we would still be debating the past. e.g Holocaust deniers, crazys, peta, and every house mom protesting the cancellation of art classes.

reply to post by Chesster


This is great science! Proof without a doubt......Penn and teller have so many degrees behind their name, that is why their show Bull#### is considered scientific authority. Doesn't Penn write for the Havard medical journal?
Teller is an expert in Physics and Chemistry, in fact I heard that Mr Hawkings asks Dr Teller his opinion on Quatum relativity when he gets stumped.These guys are just trying to make a buck. I now believe the official story...all is good in the universe... I will obey all commands without question..

Do you not reply to people who disagree with you?

Penn and Teller have hit the end of the road. they cannot handle..nor their academic support nor the fire chief.. anything beyond name calling against those that have toiled in the fields of evidence to show that the Bush gang's conspiracy theory is a constructed public myth.
Thank Philip Zelikow for that term, and may he be indicted soon.

reply to post by v1rtu0s0


I am sorry... did I miss a post? Lost track so many replied at once, didn't mean to blow you off. I love people that disagree with me! Challenged thinking is the best

Originally posted by homeslice
Thanks Penn & Teller.

I can trust a couple of illusionists completeley.

Touche,

Please tell me this thread is a joke? I'm not necessarily a truther, at-least I don't identify myself that way; but it's naive to think that there was absolutely NO conspiracy behind the attacks. What the douche-bag narrator in your video did is cherry pick a couple random theorist on the more extreme side of the spectrum and say that they represent all truthers.

You didn't disprove anything.

I love their show, but this doesn't do much for me, besides make me laugh a little.

Originally posted by LeTan
Sorry OP, but Penn and Teller are on the same level as Bill O'Reilly in my eyes. They degrade anyone who doesn't agree with them.

I don't see how one video featuring main stream media guys debunks a myriad of architects and others who have presented their facts in a less jackass manner.

Isn't that what most of the people who disagree with the OP are doing? Isn't that what happens to anyone who does not buy into the conspiracy theory?

To the OP.

I find it odd that you ask someone who mentioned the JFK conspiracy to 'address the video' - Penn and Teller opened their video by citing skepticism regarding JFK and the moon landing conspiracy as though using those two to discredit what they were advancing next - 9/11.
It's called 'discrediting by association', a psychological primer and not worthy of any serious involvement in a video purporting to be about 9/11 specifically. Is it?

Either this video is about 9/11 or it's about how people develop 'conspiracy theories' - it appears to confuse the two and as a consequence proves neither.

The political scientist argues that people develop 'skeptical' attitudes to officialdom and therefore distrust official accounts as though somehow this is 'wrong'. In that case I guess we're all supposed to believe that there are Weapons of Mass Destruction hidden somewhere in the Iraqi desert? "Oh my lord - it seems the 'conspiracy theorists called that one right' But surely they are wrong about everything else?"

Several times those in the video cited 'No evidence' of anything suggesting a conspiracy or explosives involved on 9/11 - there is lots of evidence - but one has to look first and not do so with a 'mind set' which precludes alternatives to official accounts.

As for the person saying it was an insult to the victims of 9/11 to believe in the conspiracies surrounding 9/11 - I would say it is a complete betrayal of the victims not to pursue the one thing, the only thing which really matters - the truth.

If that leads us into a deep abyss filled with conspiracies then so be it. Only the truth matters, nothing else. When the truth is finally revealed those conspiracies are no longer conspiracies - they are cold, hard facts.

Oz

Originally posted by djz3ro

Originally posted by Chesster
reply to post by wWizard

 

I did not ignore it... but a onspiracy of 100 people would fail... in time.. cause 100 people cant agree or keep quiet... you are hostile ha, anyhow any other evidence you want to share? Hope having your theory crash in your face isn't ruining you day

I've seen no hostility from wWizard myself, you're the only one i've seen get worked up about this, you and your other little OSer 'bro'

Come on now, Chesster le Cheetah, do you really still believe the video you posted is proof that the whole thing was as the OS claims?

edit on 9/25/11 by djz3ro because: spelling (my fingers are having a dyslexic day)

THANKS TRUTHER BRO

Such a joke... how can people take any of this nonsense seriously? Given the history of governments and our own government on record doing false flags? Gulf of Tonkin lie for Vietnam, U.S.S liberty by LBJ "I want that ship on the bottom of the ocean!", Iranian coup (all of these are official and ON RECORD).

Threads like this will continue, but those who have half a brain will continue to disregard them. Nice try though.

edit: feel free to convince yourself there is nothing sinister, but don't preach your nonsense and say "Disproving all 911 conspiracies" as if its fact when its clearly not. Also you have a typo. GJ. And nobody gives 2 crocks about penn and teller.

Ladies and gentlemen you heard it here first. The decades old debate about September 11th has finally been cleared up. Penn and Teller have figured out what no one else in the world has been able to.





Coming up next.. David Blain solves all the worlds wars and Chris Angel finally clears up all the moon landing debates.

reply to post by Chesster


It is a conspiracy website. Any opinion is valid here. I personally think aliens did it. Just to show us they are a threat not to be taken lightly. People can call me a nut case, but a lot of the theories people concoct are just as silly as my opinion. Maybe even more outrages….

reply to post by Chesster


this video was so sad to see from Penn and Teller. they grabbed 3 of the craziest 9/11 nutjobs and ignored any real evidence. hell the the fire chief (who arrived after at least 1 of the towers fell see 2:30 or so in the video ) describes the towers as "everything was vaporized" . not collapsed but "vaporized" .... strong words there.

Aircraft grade aluminum cannot slice thru steel reinforced concrete. Jet fuel does not burn at a high enough temperature to weaken steel reinforced concrete.

Prove these physics wrong.

Please somebody!