It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Shamatt
reply to post by SplitInfinity
Yes, you are right, The US - and other western countries, have picked and chosen their friends over the years. Being there to help them set up an industry (From which you will profit greatly at every step) or to help fight the Russians, for example. And of course they were happy for the help. But this time they soldiers are uninvited and unwanted. The diference is guest or trespasser, I suppose. Invited in or asked to leave. And if you are asked to leave and don't...... It is not the same as being there to help them when this time they don't want your help. Any way. I suppose as many of them are happy you are there helping to reconstruct as there are unhappy and biting at your ankles. Or winning, as they will see it when you all do finally pull out, and your very unclear objectives appear to have been completely unmet. Oh, the UK are just as guilty. It isn't just the US, I'm not picking on you! And you have to ask yourslef why there is the need for so much reconstruction. And why so many from accross the region flocked to Afganistan and Iraq in order to join their brothers against the US invaders, thus swelling the enimy ranks and making the whole problem worse. Dude, what a mess. And don't ask me what the answer is, I don't know. It seems to have gone too far. The US will pull out as planned I guess, the 'enimy' will claim victory as the US - whichever way they spin ot for domestic consumption - will not have acheived any of the goals they stated allong the way - except perhaps killing OBL, and they did that in PAKISTAN, which is not even supposed to be part of the arena. (If you believe that story) I think this is why the killings are being stepped up now by the Obama admin...... Dismantle enough of the current setup you can claim a win on the Al Qaeda when the time comes. Enough people will buy this to win the next election. You wait and see.
Originally posted by babloyi
reply to post by BO XIAN
Hahahahhahahahahaha...you have a hearsay story about some stuff a muslim roommate of yours told you. OF COURSE YOU ARE RIGHT! Everyone else here, (including actual muslims) ARE ALL WRONG!
.
Surah 10:99
And if thy Lord willed, all who are in the earth would have believed together. Wouldst thou compel men until they are believers? No soul can believe, except by the will of Allah
Originally posted by Shamatt
This could have gone in several forums but decided this was the best fit.
I searched but was surprised not to find this story.
IT appears 11 muslim students stood up to object to a speach made by a visiting Israeli diplomat
Charges against one were dismissed. The others stood trial, accused of interrupting Israeli a]mbassador Michael Oren's February 8, 2010 University of California-Irvine speech, criticizing him and Israeli injustice.
Orange County District Attorney Tony Rackauckas filed misdemeanor criminal charges, accusing them of disturbing a public meeting and engaging in a conspiracy to do so.
A seccond article gives more detail and oppinion
Jewish leaders applauded the verdict. According to Shalom Elcott, Jewish Federation & Family Services president:
The student disruption "crossed the moral, social and intellectual line of civility and tolerance. While we accept the right and requirement of a public institution to provide an unfettered forum for diverse points of view, we do not, nor will be ever, support 'hate speech.' "
In other words, free, honest, accurate comments are hateful when Muslims state them. Jews and Christians can say what they please.
The Council on American-Islamic Relations, Los Angeles (CAIR/LA) headlined, "Muslim Groups Appalled by 'Irvine 11' Guilty Verdict, Declare Travesty of Justice," saying:
"Leaders of four prominent Muslim organizations" expressed outrage over an appalling verdict, "convicting 10 of the 'Irvine 11' students on (unjust) misdemeanor counts...."
Indeed. In America your freedoms and liberties depend on your race and religion.
"You can heckle the President. You can heckle high ranking government officials, but it you heckle an Israeli diplomat you will be prosecuted."
Well, You would be OK if you were white and Jewish I expect.
What is happening America?
I read today about girls being coralled and maced in the high street for being part of a peacfull demonstration - I saw the video, it was sickening.
I read last week about a black man who was put to death for killing a cop - only everyone seems to think he was innocent.
I read about cops beating and killing civilians and not being charged.
I read about a man being beaten for heckling Sarah Palin while she spoke abuot delivering freedom to the middle east - he was dragged out and abused!
What on earth is goin on in the US?
Originally posted by Shamatt
Originally posted by DerbyCityLights
Ive said this before and I will say it again. Freedom of speech does NOT equal Freedom of slander. The fact is, they broke the school policy and also broke local law by not protesting in the approved protest area, which was NOT in the auditorium during the speech!
Another thing Im sick pf hearing is how these punks got severly punished. Get over yourself! They ended up with 5 years probation and community service and the 5 years of probation gets reduced to 1 year if they finish the community service before January 2012. Boy, thats harsh for breaking the law Also, this isn't the first time this group of students have done this type of crap and last time they got let off the hook completely.edit on 25-9-2011 by DerbyCityLights because: (no reason given)
Speaking the truth is not slander.
And what's this all about? Only permitted to protest in certain designated areas - when did you accept that as an American citizen? You don't feel this is just police state rules - what about YOUR freedoms, my friend? When you find you can only say certain things in certain places without running the risk of picking up a criminal conviction.
You find the rules all too convenient and 'fair' at the moment. Wait untill it is you and yours who are saying the wrong thing in the wrong place. 1984 slightly?
Originally posted by SplitInfinity
Yes...it is a mess...but if you want someone to blame...you have to look at the Muslim Terrorists who caused the U.S. to react. You have to look at all the corrupt Middle Eastern Leaders who subvert their own people to stay in power so they can attain riches...all the while playing a double standard of funding Madrassas that are breading grounds for extremests and terrorists. They steal from the populous all the while secretly condeming the supposed Great Satan.
Originally posted by SplitInfinity
Reguardless of what a person feels was either accomplished or not by the wars...one thing was esstablished...again. ATTACKING THE UNITED STATES IN ANY WAY OR METHOD....HAS VERY DEADLY CONSEQUENCES. Even now that lesson is having effect as intel reports have intercepted various communications between Terrorist Funding Personel and certain countries that covertly fund them. The underlying responce to the solicitors was...the last time we funded you...we ended up with a result of entire counties being occupied and huge amount of American weapons and troops on our door step. This time we will pass. Split Infinity
My point was that for the crime they were charged with, the punishment they were given was standard to harsh. And my contention is that If it was a slightly different situation (such as some non-muslim group protesting some non-israeli thing), the punishment (or even the charge) wouldn't exist. For the sake of an example I gave the video and that site. While that particular video was not in California, they HAVE had protests in California, and they most certainly have a history of organising such protests (the same as what you saw in the video in several colleges and university campuses throughout the US).
Of course, in the end, this is all what-iffing and hypothesising, and we can't really do or judge what would have happened if this or that had or hadn't occurred, but I'd like to think that judging from other similar situations, that the fallout would be much less.