It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by gariac
reply to post by RestingInPieces
mac.softpedia.com...
If you have linux, load up kismet. It is a free packet sniffer. You can spot all the wifi activity. If you are setting up a wireless network, you really need to do this. Some networks are stealth (no SSID broadcast). You don't want to interfere with that stealth network, even though the admin was a bit of a jerk by not broadcasting the SSID. [Those Symbol barcode readers are notorious for being stealth.] Some newer routers can fine stealth networks. If you want to do a complete site survey, you need to scan for wireless video too. It is in the same band. If you are doing a commercial set up, you'd probably want to monitor for a few days since some people turn their router on and off.
I sniffed my own packets and found a few security holes in my Blackberry that I fixed. Basically the phone was probing every place I ever used wifi and had saved the configuration. Most phones have this feature. So the phone was spewing out coffee shops and hotels where I had used wifi. Now Starbucks isn't all that unique, but if you pair up your wifi with WAPs that have unqiue SSIDs, then you are revealing your hangouts. [Suppose you save a wifi profile at some unsavory place. Strip club, brothel, Ron Paul for President office, etc.) [Hey, that was a joke.] Computers do this too (windows, mac, even linux) depending on how you save your wifi profiles. It is not a security risk in that you will get hacked, but it does show a bit about your habits, or at least geeky habits.
Windows XP is just the worst at spewing out wifi junk. The classic is "hpsetup".
blog.chron.com...
You see this all the time. In general, the worse thing you can do is connector your wireless device to some random ad hoc network, which is what hpsetup is. I'm not sure if it is a security issue for the person running XP. Blackberry will "see" an ad hoc, but will never pair up with one. The OS blocks it because it is way too risky even if you think you know who the ad hoc network is.
www.airdefense.net...
The iphone will connector to an ad hoc right out of the box. No hacking needed. Android as far as I know needs a bit of hacking to connect to an ad hoc network. Seriously, this is a bad idea.
The iphone doesn't have a battery door to save money. If you ever design some electronic product, cases are just insanely expensive. A slide off door...hey, that will cost you. Same goes for sockets. [No SDHC for apple either.] Some really cheap notebooks solder the memory chips just to avoid buying sockets.
Network 7: BSSID xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx
Manuf : Rim
First : date/time
Last : date/time
Type : probe
BSSID : xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx
Channel : 0
Frequency : 2422 - 1 packets, 0.59%
Frequency : 2427 - 79 packets, 46.75%
Frequency : 2437 - 70 packets, 41.42%
Frequency : 2447 - 18 packets, 10.65%
Frequency : 2452 - 1 packets, 0.59%
Max Seen : 2000
LLC : 169
Data : 0
Crypt : 0
Fragments : 0
Retries : 0
Total : 169
Datasize : 0
Last BSSTS : 0
Network 8: BSSID xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx
Manuf : Unknown
First : date/time
Last : date/time
Type : ad-hoc
BSSID : xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx
SSID 1
Type :
Beacon SSID : "hpsetup"
First : date/time
Last : date/time
Max Rate : 11.0
Beacon : 10
Packets : 3134
Encryption : None
Channel : 6
Frequency : 2422 - 23 packets, 0.73%
Frequency : 2427 - 848 packets, 27.06%
Frequency : 2432 - 284 packets, 9.06%
Frequency : 2437 - 879 packets, 28.05%
Frequency : 2442 - 169 packets, 5.39%
Frequency : 2447 - 872 packets, 27.82%
Frequency : 2452 - 58 packets, 1.85%
Frequency : 2457 - 1 packets, 0.03%
Max Seen : 1000
LLC : 3134
Data : 0
Crypt : 0
Fragments : 0
Retries : 0
Total : 3134
Datasize : 0
Last BSSTS : 1860711102
Originally posted by Domo1
I certainly see the need for LE to have this kind of technology. Helping track down a very dangerous fugitive or kidnap victim is a noble goal for this kind of tech. On the flip side, I highly doubt there is any oversight whatsoever in using these devices. I had no idea that local Sheriffs office had access to this thing. I'm also a little surprised that there is no warrant needed to use one. They apparently can't listen in on the phone calls, but I have trouble believing that. I am also troubled that they wipe the things before thy have to go to court. Perhaps not as sinister as the FBI's Carnivore, but still...
Just goes to show that all of our technology, the things we think make are life easier are actually making it easier to be oppressed/ spied on by our own government.
online.wsj.com
(visit the link for the full news article)edit on 23-9-2011 by Domo1 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Domo1
reply to post by Blackmarketeer
I think you're right. As I understand phones have another battery in addition to the main one. I don't know if there is much you can do to avoid the tracking.
“No matter how the StingRay is used — to identify, locate or intercept — they always send signals through the walls of homes,” which should trigger a warrant requirement, Soghoian said. “The signals always penetrate a space protected by the Fourth Amendment.”