posted on Sep, 24 2011 @ 10:49 AM
Here's the big difference in 2012, in one word: FACEBOOK
With 3/4 of the universe, including Jesus, having a facebook page, Ron Paul's message is being distributed at the ground level more than any other
candidate before. If I post this story about Fox once again censoring Sen. Paul, 150+ people will see it. (and my friend list is anemic by FB
standards)
If half those people read the headline, that's 75 people who are exposed to the concept, more open to further proof should it come their way. If 5% of
my friends open it and read it, that's 7 folks that have been educated. They talk to the guy in the next cubicle, who Google it, and he posts it to
his friends...
The media's choice to suppress Paul is being exposed by status updates and youtube video shares. Whether the media is justified in modifying their
results due to "internet campaigning" by RP supporters is irrelevant. The perception of the media's actions only causes more voters to wake up to Ron
Paul's message.
edit on 24-9-2011 by blamethegreys because: (no reason given)