It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by SquirrelNutz
Great research and education on the two subjects. Great structure, complete with quotes, cited sources and other links.
Unfortunately, I do not see the same connection as you do.
80% Aboriginal history, 19% Peruvian anomaly (Band of Holes), 1% effort to tie them together (picture).
Originally posted by nanny
Great thread I shall go back & continue through all the links you have given. You made a bell ring in my head when you said it was as if the aboriginal people were there before the creation, as I had found this a while ago, thought you may find it interesting.
www.theonion.com...
Also in the Bible!. There were other people on the earth when Adam & Eve were created, God put a mark on Cain so that he wouldn't be attacked by other people!.
Originally posted by Hanslune
Good first thread Tsugiri! Setup well but the evidence is weak as noted by others, but you do have the methodology down.
Well done
Oh three thoughts on why people would dig lots of holes
1. looking for something and see #2
2. crazy
3. penalty, ie forced labour
Originally posted by Tsurugi
Originally posted by Hanslune
Good first thread Tsugiri! Setup well but the evidence is weak as noted by others, but you do have the methodology down.
Well done
Thanks! And yes, the evidence is weak. There is a visual similarity and that is all.
That is why I listed the Gray Area as one of the possible forums for posting...as I take it the Gray Area is a place for ideas that are "way out there".
As I said, I just wanted to see what people thought about it.
Oh three thoughts on why people would dig lots of holes
1. looking for something and see #2
2. crazy
3. penalty, ie forced labour
Those are good possibilities for people digging lots of holes, you're right.
Do you know of any solid science resource on the Band of Holes, btw? I figured if anyone knew, you would.
Originally posted by nagabonar
Now if anyone could find out where Sir George Grey found that rock painting , and maybe even find a photo of the original, it would be much easier to compare. Unfortunately though, the "holes" on the aboriginal image he found are not really clear, especially if one compares to the Peruvian holes.
On a second note, i find it quite funny that Sir George "Grey" publishes an aboriginal drawing resembling a "Grey"
No, but I would suggest checking with the ardent Andeanists at the Hall of Ma'at
Originally posted by Tsurugi
reply to post by Hanslune
No, but I would suggest checking with the ardent Andeanists at the Hall of Ma'at
Whew....the who at the what? If that's a joke(and I'm sure it is ) it's way over my head.
Originally posted by SquirrelNutz
reply to post by Tsurugi
Great research and education on the two subjects. Great structure, complete with quotes, cited sources and other links.
Unfortunately, I do not see the same connection as you do.
80% Aboriginal history, 19% Peruvian anomaly (Band of Holes), 1% effort to tie them together (picture).
That is a rather large jump/connection to make. I find BOTH histories fascinating. I'm gonna need more though to assume that they are related.
S&F for your efforts, regardless.
Originally posted by mudbeed
reply to post by Tsurugi
One of the best reads as far as history is concerned I have seen on ATS while one of the worst connections and stretches I've seen on ATS (the picture and the holes)
The holes and pattern do not even resemble eachother.... why the heck did you come to that conclusion?
Originally posted by Harte
Originally posted by SquirrelNutz
reply to post by Tsurugi
Great research and education on the two subjects. Great structure, complete with quotes, cited sources and other links.
Unfortunately, I do not see the same connection as you do.
80% Aboriginal history, 19% Peruvian anomaly (Band of Holes), 1% effort to tie them together (picture).
That is a rather large jump/connection to make. I find BOTH histories fascinating. I'm gonna need more though to assume that they are related.
S&F for your efforts, regardless.
The squirrel is not always nutz, it appears.
Originally posted by Tsurugi
Originally posted by Harte
Originally posted by SquirrelNutz
reply to post by Tsurugi
Great research and education on the two subjects. Great structure, complete with quotes, cited sources and other links.
Unfortunately, I do not see the same connection as you do.
80% Aboriginal history, 19% Peruvian anomaly (Band of Holes), 1% effort to tie them together (picture).
That is a rather large jump/connection to make. I find BOTH histories fascinating. I'm gonna need more though to assume that they are related.
S&F for your efforts, regardless.
The squirrel is not always nutz, it appears.
Your kind words of wisdom are always appreciated, Harte.
Originally posted by Tsurugi
Another aspect of the Dreaming that confuses me is that the history of it seems to imply that the Aborigines predate the creation part; somehow their ancestors were witness to the emptiness of the land. And yet the teachings of the Dreaming also say:
"It was during the Dreamtime that the creators made men and women, decreed the laws which all must obey - their behavior to one another, the customs of food distribution, the rules of marriage, the rituals of initiation and the ceremonies of death which must be performed so that the spirit of the dead would travel peacefully to his or her spirit-place.
...which leaves me stumped.