I called NASA regarding the No Fly Zone on Moon

reply to post by kdog1982


Read the contract, one contract costs 52 million!!

lol. ill read that a little bit later, thanks for sharing

Here's a credible source:

NASA to Launch Guidelines to Protect Lunar Artifacts
Science 2 September 2011:
Vol. 333 no. 6047 pp. 1207-1208
DOI: 10.1126/science.333.6047.1207
www.sciencemag.org...

And here:

NASA to Launch Guidelines
To Protect Lunar Artifacts
lunasox.gsfc.nasa.gov...

so now your conversation is being e-mailed around NASA for comedy relief

classic !

Originally posted by scapers2u
reply to post by kdog1982

 

Read the contract, one contract costs 52 million!!

lol. ill read that a little bit later, thanks for sharing

Scroll down to tasks orders.

GRC has been given responsibility for the Crew Exploration Vehicle (CEV) Service Module (SM) and Spacecraft Adapter (SA). As part of this GRC will be developing requirements, performing design cycles for government reference configurations, providing insight/oversight of the contractor’s development of SM/SA and performing Independent Verification and Validation (IV&V) of contractor efforts.

www.grc.nasa.gov...

And you are welcome.

Also found this interesting.

The NASA Glenn Research Center (GRC) ion propulsion program addresses the need for high specific impulse ion propulsion systems and technology across a broad range of mission applications and power levels NASA GRC is involved in essentially all U.S. government ion propulsion development activities in either a leadership position and/or in a technical management role. Development areas include: high-power - both highthroughput and high-specific impulse - engine components, engines, and power processing technology, lightweight high-efficiency sub-kilowatt ion propulsion, and fundamentals. NASA GRC is also leading two highly focused activities: development ofView Task Requests file:///V|/GESS2/FOIA/FOIA-00366/013.htm[3/11/2010 10:52:06 AM] the Next Generation Ion propulsion system for the agency (NEXT – NASA’s Evolutionary Xenon Thruster) under the In-Space Program, and development of high-power highspecific impulse ion thruster technology applicable to nuclear systems (HiPEP – High Power Electric Propulsion) under Project Prometheus. NASA GRC is also supporting a number of other agency ion propulsion initiatives: flight thruster hardware component manufacturing and flight thruster and power processor technical support for the DAWN flight project; post-life test analysis of the flight spare NSTAR thruster; technical oversight of carbon-based ion optics activities and high-power ion thruster technology activities at JPL; and support of United States Air Force materials contracts for carbonbased ion optics fabrication. NASA GRC also continues to support on-orbit operations of the International Space Station plasma contactor systems, which use hollow cathod

www.grc.nasa.gov...

reply to post by kdog1982


That contract has expired, and the deliverable was just a report.

Originally posted by Illustronic
reply to post by kdog1982

 

That contract has expired, and the deliverable was just a report.

Yes,but there is more,look above your post.

Originally posted by Ghost375



S+F for verifying something that's easily verifiable by calling.

It is obvious that the person who answered the phone does not know what NASA is doing. The tail not knowing what the head is doing. Nothing is easily verifiable by call.

I'm more curious as to who is going to be enforcingthe "No Fly Zone".

Will it be the Greys or Reptilians?

Really No-Fly Zones?

Nasa has covered up, smugded, lost, releases crappy resolution (photos) for every single mission it has ever taken on and the scientific worlds knows it. Really black and white photos in this age of techology being released is just a JOKE and Failure to disclose what they really are investagating and discovering.

No other country or private organizations would ever comply with such a foulish and ignoramous idea for just those reasons. If anything it is ecxactly why they wouldnt fallow a no-fly zone idea.

I completey have no respect for what NASA and JPL tells us. Really I do think it should be scrapped and given to the students of universities. NASA non-disclosures over the years make me puke.

Love and Peace

I want to step to the front of the stupid line but this is a typical double hoax
played constantly by cartel agents to save whatever secrets they have.
So now we can't see lunar landers even if we had rocket fuel to waste
looking for them. A No Fly Zone Hoax protecting the Lunar Lander Hoax.
There must be many more of these.

Seems a valid concern and reasonable to me that someday an entrepreneur may gather up a national treasure and take it home to sell on E-Bay.

I don't see any reason to suspect a trick on this one. It all fits.

Kudos OP for taking the initiative. It appears that girl was uninformed on this one.

reply to post by scapers2u


she said abovetopsecret? lol looks like ATS is well known then.
Great job on calling nasa.

it was in the wording, interesting she calls it an outright hoax in any case

there is no no-fly-zone. there is a zone of historical preservation

they do this in libya too. this isnt war, its humanitarian kinetic milatary action.

to them, they are actually two different things

Originally posted by scapers2u
I called NASA, asking for the library.

The first guy i asked if it was true, because i read it somewhere online, he says uhhhhhh, please hold.. lol

I was starting to get worried i would get MIB at my door, but i holded, and a girl came on the line, i asked her and she has never heard of it, and she said the Senate would smack nasa on the head if they tried to do that.

I told her to google it and she said abovetopsecret? I said uhhh...no....lol

She said it was an internet hoax, so truth or not?

Can anyone link me an actual credible site for this news

Holded? Are we serious right now? This isn't even a typo... this is just about the worst form of English I've ever seen.

I believe the word is "Held" my good sir.

Carry on, now, carry on.

Originally posted by JohnySeagull
reply to post by scapers2u

 

instead of saying its an internet hoax, she probably meant to say the internet is a hoax.

you cant believe anything you see on the internet or on tv. its all a hoax. infact anything you see with your eyes is a hoax. you will only see the truth if you keep your eyes wide shut.

good of you to call though.

JohnySeagull i love your posts! this one reminds me of an old Motown Records hit tune that was a monster for many bands who covered it: "I Heard It Through the Grapevine".

the final verse of that song starts off "People say believe half of what you see, Son, and none of what you hear.."

IF it is true, how would they enforce the no fly zones ?
Do they have space capable F-16's on the ready ?

I thought all of space was a no fly zone? Unless of course you are nasa. At least it seems that way.

reply to post by scapers2u


Pretty sure other interested nations would have something to say about NASA claiming jurisdiction on any part of the moon. It could easily be percieved as a hostile action.
Not a smart move, And how excatly would they be policing it? with some black ops space fighter thats not meant to exist?

The logic isn't there, this is most likely a hoax, at least the part about NASA being public with the plans anyway, they'd never go public wioth this kind of info for the reasons stated above.

i jus find it odd that weve neva gone bck to the moon consderin weve found water up there n theres supposedly a super effeicent fuel. jus weird hw were nt buildin loads of bases n have nt occupied it by the second decade in the 21st century i thought this was ment to b the best century were we set a precedent!

I dont even know why you wasted your time, thats like calling NASA and asking them if Elenin is going to destroy the world because you heard it on the internet.